ElGatoGrande
EGG
- Messages
- 10,109
- Reaction score
- 7,327
I dunno,,, I think Hasselbeck got lucky on that one,,, if Scandrick looks back 1 millisecond sooner it's an easy pick and everyone would be saying what an idiotic/ poor throw,,,
Biggems;3055042 said:I will say this, if Scandrick gets his eyes on the ball a split second sooner, it might have been an INT or at least a pass defended
QBs making up for poor decisions with athletic talent is the name of the game... you would do it too, if you could!theogt;3055040 said:May have been an accurate throw, but it was a poor decision.
you must not have heard of the stock markettheogt;3055047 said:You determine whether it was a poor decision at the time the decision is made. Not based on the results.
BraveHeartFan;3055626 said:Worked out well simply cause Scandrick didn't look for the ball quite quick enough. Had he looked a little quicker then he would have picked that ball. He'll get his head around quicker, I believe, moving forward. I don't think too many people, in the future, will try testing him in that tight of coverage once he starts turning that head quicker and picking those.
xWraithx;3055624 said:my question is, what did Branch say to the camera afterwards?
Biggems;3055039 said:That was an awesome throw by Hasselbeck. How did he fit that ball in there?
Scandrick had excellent coverage on the play. I couldn't believe the ball squeezed in there when I saw it the first time and then again on replay.
BTW, I am watching NFL Network right now.....and they are doing the Red Zone Rewind or whatever it is called. They just showed the play and once again, I am in awe of the accuracy of the throw.