Galian Beast
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 14,735
- Reaction score
- 7,457
Whats the word out there?
Galian Beast;2825958 said:Always been a fan of the lead blocker...
Word is Traning Camp practices start one month from today, not today.Galian Beast;2825929 said:Whats the word out there?
THUMPER;2826110 said:I have never been in favor of having a FB that isn't a runner. I realize that Moose was a major key in our running attack in the 90s but I still prefer having 2 guys back there that can do it all. Maybe I'm just too old school and like the system Landry used back in the day.
Also, Moose was an excellent receiver and with Emmitt able to carry the ball as many times as we needed him to, it worked out for us very nicely. Unfortunately, that is not the case very often and isn't the case now so I would rather go with a RB that can block well rather than a FB that can only block.
If all we need is a lead blocker then an OL like Doug Free or Montrae Holland would do nicely.
Moose was at least 242.burmafrd;2826144 said:Ideally you want your lead blocker/FB to be smaller then a TE to have the neccesary quickness to pick up blitzes and make quick moves when needed that 260 lb plus guys just cannot do.
So arround 230 is about max.
He needs to have good hands to catch passes to be another threat. Running the ball is usually last but its a good option to have.
I fail to see how it should be that hard to find a good one.
speedkilz88;2826848 said:Moose was at least 242.
burmafrd;2826144 said:Ideally you want your lead blocker/FB to be smaller then a TE to have the neccesary quickness to pick up blitzes and make quick moves when needed that 260 lb plus guys just cannot do.
So arround 230 is about max.
He needs to have good hands to catch passes to be another threat. Running the ball is usually last but its a good option to have.
I fail to see how it should be that hard to find a good one.