summerisfunner;1125210 said:or are the Steelers the worst Super Bowl winner in history, surpassing the '02 Bucs?
dbair1967;1125215 said:87 Commanders
David
burmafrd;1125219 said:The Bucs that year were very good- their D peaked at the right time and their offense was efficient. Frankly, I think they were better then the first Pats team that won the SB.
burmafrd;1125225 said:Pats sank the year after they won the first SB as well.
dbair1967;1125208 said:I think maybe some people need to come to grips with the idea that the Steelers just arnt very good
David
Future 585;1125326 said:thats what i think. rothlisburger or however you spell it is finally being exposed. he wasnt great his rookie year when everybody fell in love with him, and now that he must carry the offense, he cant do it.
Jimz31;1125342 said:I agree about Roethlisberger. They really didn't have him throwing that much. I had a feeling that he was more smoke and mirrors more than anything else.
summerisfunner;1125210 said:or are the Steelers the worst Super Bowl winner in history, surpassing the '02 Bucs?
Future 585;1125326 said:thats what i think. rothlisburger or however you spell it is finally being exposed. he wasnt great his rookie year when everybody fell in love with him, and now that he must carry the offense, he cant do it.
Uh-Oh;1125407 said:They are the best at getting the refs' favor. Except last week.