3rdEyewarrior
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,903
- Reaction score
- 3,544
Not for market value.He is a wuss. No physicality to his game.
Not for market value.He is a wuss. No physicality to his game.
“Hey guys maybe none of the other NFL teams know what we here in the ‘zone know and they will trade something good for him”We need to trade him in the off season before he has no value.
Give him a million for every one of Daks turnoversPaying Diggs $25M/year.......huge problem.
Diggs is not in the same zip code as DeionHe’s a cornerback. Deion had zero physicality
Bingo. He had a chance to knock kittle off that huge bobbling catch and whiffed. He made some lame dive with his eyes closed........He wasn't elite this year and certainly wouldn't be starting for SF. They don't tolerate CBs that aren't physical.He is a wuss. No physicality to his game.
True but our linebackers can barely tackle and the whining about Diggs is his physicalityDiggs is not in the same zip code as Deion
He could have easily knocked the ball down on the Kittle long pass, which changed the course of the game. Instead, he meekly whiffed on the tackle. A few plays later he drops an interception that was in his hands. If he makes one of those two plays, we may have won!I agree. He’s going to command a price tag that is just too high for what he’s actually giving us.
In the TB game he was the only one who didn’t step up.
And then he had a golden opportunity to make a play this game, and he didn’t.
Outside of the Pollard injury, I think that missed int was the biggest play of the game.
@FanofJerry what say you now? Those business decisions certainly came back to bite us todayIt comes down to risk?
Which side are you on? You want your shut down guy playing? Or do you want him to make a business decision on a couple of tackles a game?
Everyone gets the effort thing. Its what do you do when you are an owner or coach with a lot riding on the line? Things change when there is something of significance to lose. Its why internet GM's are so unreasonable...they have nothing to lose. Real GM's lose a million+ yearly salary if they make risky decisions that dont pan out.
Personally...I dont think Diggs antics are costing us games. Lets see what happens if teams find a way to exploit his reluctance to tackle. Until then...Im cool with a couple business decisions per game that keep my stud corner locking down receivers for 70 snaps a game over. Give me 40 lock down snaps and I'll give you 20-30 yards that Diggs gives up on bad tackling.
Yeah the idiot led with his shoulder and looked away instead of punching the ball out.He could have easily knocked the ball down on the Kittle long pass, which changed the course of the game. Instead, he meekly whiffed on the tackle. A few plays later he drops an interception that was in his hands. If he makes one of those two plays, we may have won!
He has become a weak player, who is afraid of contact.
With that username you already know he’s a moron@FanofJerry what say you now? Those business decisions certainly came back to bite us today
Our linebackers were not a problem in these playoffs. Diggs was! He is as much a reason for losing as anyone else.True but our linebackers can barely tackle and the whining about Diggs is his physicality
Nobody a bigger reason that #4. Nobody even close to that sack of ****Our linebackers were not a problem in these playoffs. Diggs was! He is as much a reason for losing as anyone else.