ABQCOWBOY
Regular Joe....
- Messages
- 58,929
- Reaction score
- 27,716
MichaelWinicki said:Sago1 is quickly becoming the new "Nors".
I wonder if the Central needs another quality poster.
Oh..... that was cold Mikial.
BTW, good afternoon to you.
MichaelWinicki said:Sago1 is quickly becoming the new "Nors".
I wonder if the Central needs another quality poster.
ABQCOWBOY said:Oh..... that was cold Mikial.
BTW, good afternoon to you.
You got A/C right? Back when I lived in Rochester, I remember the summers and always likened them to living in "he77" because I didnt have A/C or a pool.MichaelWinicki said:LOL!!!!
I'm just having some fun with Sago1. I like folks that have opinions and aren't scared to share them.
Afternoon ABQ.
Blistering hot hear in western NY State. This ain't right.
Alexander said:You could also award Vinatieri the Ray Lucas Trophy for the "free agent that everyone just KNEW was coming to Dallas because of Parcells".
abersonc said:that is particularly funny as we all know what sort of relationship Bill has with kickers. I'm positive that he and Vini were real tight
MichaelWinicki said:LOL!!!!
I'm just having some fun with Sago1. I like folks that have opinions and aren't scared to share them.
Afternoon ABQ.
Blistering hot hear in western NY State. This ain't right.
5Stars said:Stop moaning and groaning about "hot" in NY!
Come out West if you want HOT! And, that goes for the ladies out here, too!
BrAinPaiNt said:Yet Bill told Adam the best advice was to stay where he was (patriots) because he was such a local hero and had it made.
Alexander said:And I remember you had people jumping on his case because that comment seemed like Coach Parcells was steering him away from Dallas.:laugh2:
Alexander said:I I don't recall him booming them all out of the endzone either.
CanadianCowboysFan said:Actually he did, problem was they weren't on kickoffs but on missed 25 yard FGs.
abersonc said:let's see, extra kicker or extra linebacker? wonder how Bill ends up going.
cleverusername said:Thats an easy one. Especially since Bill used to be a kicking coach and takes pride in finding and developing young kickers. A lot of people think the kicking game is one of the most important aspects of a Parcells coached team.
The coaches do not have a choice in the matter. They do not set the schedule. The games must be played. If a coach does not attempt to play his starters in preseason games as equally as other coaches, his starters and backup players (i.e. depth) would suffer from less practice/repetition/preparation. The same goes for training camp. My suggestion would apply to every team.Colo said:If coaches really thought it would benifit them at the end of the season to have their players resting rather than playing one or two of the preseason games, why wouldn't they just sit all of their starters for the entire game during one or two of the preseason games? They could cut back on what they do during training camp too?
I never said they were idiots. They do adhere to the preseason schedule because it must be played. Again, unless a coach knows that he has a bonafide, sure-fire Super Bowl winner, he's not going to cut back on the amount of work his players need to be successful for the regular season. He's only going to cut back so much on the amount of reps he thinks his players need.Colo said:My point is, these guys aren't idiots, and they obviously want to do what's best for them regarding the season. If cutting back on the amount of reps players get during training camp and preseason really helped, they'd do it..
DallasEast said:The coaches do not have a choice in the matter.
DallasEast said:Plus, coaches do cut back on the amount of minutes their starters put in during preseason games, but this usually happens during the final preseason game. This helps lessen the chance for injuries, etc., but even if any player (starter or backup) is on the field for any length of time--it doesn't eliminate the possibility of something happening which could've been prevented if the games were not played.
DallasEast said:Again, unless a coach knows that he has a bonafide, sure-fire Super Bowl winner, he's not going to cut back on the amount of work his players need to be successful for the regular season. He's only going to cut back so much on the amount of reps he thinks his players need.
For that matter, there isn't a rule that states that coaches have to play anyone during the preseason.Colo said:I'm not aware of any rule that says coaches must play their starters a certain amount of minutes during preseason games.
You're welcome.Gee, thanks for enlightening me.
...Agree completely. The coach is given a specified amount of time allocated for TC that he is not allowed to exceed without ramifications from the league. Again, I may be mistaken, but I don't think it's written anywhere in league policy that teams must practice for a minimum of X number of hours. If a coach and owner truly thought his team would benifit from less work during TC and PS, they'd play their starters less during preseason and work them less during training camp. If the length of TC and PS are what the problem is, why wouldn't a coach do as much as he could within the rules to eliminate the problem?
Honestly, I don't really care one way or the other about the number of PS games or how long TC is. I am only concerned with what happens when it counts. I just don't agree that the length of TC and PS is the problem. If it was, they'd do something about it.
I'd rather have Wahle and Vinateri than Rivera and Vandy.abersonc said:Sometimes folks think that every FA is dying to come to Dallas.
Let's give a huge welcome to the winner of the 2006 version of Mike Wahle Award, Mr. Adam Vinateri!!!!!
big dog cowboy said:I'd rather have Wahle and Vinateri than Rivera and Vandy.