DMN: Cowboys-Giants Inactives

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,811
Reaction score
47,779
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Marion Barber is playing; Fred Robbins is not

5:59 PM Sun, Dec 14, 2008 | Permalink | Yahoo! Buzz
Tim MacMahon http://www.***BANNED-URL***/blogs/images/email-icon.jpg E-mail http://www.***BANNED-URL***/blogs/images/email-icon.jpg News tips

Both teams' inactive lists include good news for the Cowboys. RB Marion Barber isn't on the Cowboys' list. DT Fred Robbins, a major force in the middle of New York's defense, is on the Giants' list.

Here are the inactives ...

COWBOYS: 3QB Brooks Bollinger, CB Pacman Jones, S Courtney Brown, RB Alonzo Coleman, LB Steve Octavien, OG Montrae Holland, OG Joe Berger, WR Isaiah Stanback.

GIANTS: K Lawrence Tynes, RB Brandon Jacobs, CB Sam Madison, LB Jonathan Goff, OT Adam Koets, DL Leger Douzable, DE Jerome McDougle, DT Fred Robbins.



http://www.***BANNED-URL***/images/ice3/icons/blog.gif Comments (1) Leave comment | http://www.***BANNED-URL***/blogs/images/email-icon.jpg E-mail entry
 
why is Joe Berger on the roster again?

I'm hoping that McQ being active means he's starting at LG

might as well
 
With Robbins out for the Giants, who do they have for their DT rotation?
 
Bob Sacamano;2490271 said:
why is Joe Berger on the roster again?

I'm hoping that McQ being active means he's starting at LG

might as well

McQuistan is always active as the 3rd tackle because he backs up both RT and LT
 
Bob Sacamano;2490271 said:
why is Joe Berger on the roster again?

I'm hoping that McQ being active means he's starting at LG

might as well

McQ is always active. I think this is Doug Free's first game of the year, however.
 
Bob Sacamano;2490271 said:
why is Joe Berger on the roster again?

I'm hoping that McQ being active means he's starting at LG

might as well

I still say that Toniu Fonoti would be an upgrade at LG over anyone currently healthy.

But that's just me.
 
Smith22;2490355 said:
Kind of proves his point.

Not really. Someone has to be inactive. It doesn't mean you don't need them for depth.
 
Smith22;2490355 said:
Kind of proves his point.

He isnt better than any of the 4 WR's is he? Is he betetr on ST than the 3rd or 4th guys?

No, he isnt.

So no, it doesnt prove his point.
 
AdamJT13;2490489 said:
Not really. Someone has to be inactive. It doesn't mean you don't need them for depth.

So his one use is filling the necessary inactive slot, just in case. Consider me convinced that he is in fact NOT useless.
 
TheCount;2490506 said:
So his one use is filling the necessary inactive slot, just in case. Consider me convinced that he is in fact NOT useless.

Most teams dont activate 5 WR's on game day.
 
TheCount;2490506 said:
So his one use is filling the necessary inactive slot, just in case. Consider me convinced that he is in fact NOT useless.

taking up space is important, GOSH!
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,003
Messages
14,505,696
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top