News: DMN: Sturm's Morning After: The Future Appears To Be Now

[NewsBot]

*** Message was removed by demand from DMN ***

 

[Doc50]

Couldn't have said it better myself.

 

[tyke1doe]

That is why we follow the sport. That game is one of the few that will stick out when you look back at any season. To know a classic from just another Sunday, you ask yourself if you will remember this day in a decade.
Well, as far as I am concerned, I am going to go out on a limb and suggest you will remember where you were when the Cowboys, led by their rookies (again), walked into Pittsburgh, traded body-blows and haymakers for three hours, and then left with the coveted win.

This was not your typical win. This was an extraordinary back and forth effort that will be given the "instant classic" label and perhaps require a 2nd viewing over watching Monday Night Football this week.

Pittsburgh threw a lot at the Cowboys and got superb efforts from many - including their star QB Ben Roethlisberger, not to mention Le'Veon Bell and Antoino Brown who all were able to do some pretty impressive things in a home game where they needed to stop the bleeding to their season. They rallied the troops and the whipped their home crowd into a frenzy. It was a late game on a November afternoon where the whole football nation would be locked in, wondering if this upstart squad from Dallas was worth all of the hype.

Indeed.

Oh, sure, there were many things the Cowboys could have done better on this day in Pittsburgh. There is no doubt that the defense has to be better and that the health of their secondary was exposed when Roethlisberger threw for over 400 yards and had the team backed up against the wall as the Steelers took the lead in the final minute. It was the first time a Cowboys opponent had passed for 400 yards in the Rod Marinelli-era (since 2014). In fact, it reminded us of that Monte Kiffin year in 2013 where Dallas allowed 400 yards three different times to Matthew Stafford and both Manning brothers.

The offense found themselves getting a bit frustrated because they could not put much together in the first half beyond an unbelievable 83-yard screen play where Dak Prescott timed a throw to Ezekiel Elliott, who then hit the turbo and followed a convoy of the two guards and the center who were clearing out Steelers in the path. Elliott needed one last nudge from Terrance Williams at midfield and it was over. This young talent can take any play to the end-zone, and this one quickly served notice to those in attendance that this was going to be a ballgame. That pulled a 12-3 game back to 12-10 and the afternoon of intrigue was underway.

This season continues to be about a player who has yet to even play a snap - Tony Romo. He helped lay the foundation for this season and so many people in these parts regard Romo as the only hero at QB they have ever known. There is nothing like your first love and if you are a Cowboys fan of a certain age, you may only go back to the very end of Aikman, all the retreads in between, and that glorious day when they finally put Tony into the game in 2006. Since then, you have been debating people on his behalf against Eli Manning or Donovan McNabb and were certain the Cowboys had their version that simply lacked the appropriate supporting cast to ever go as far as he deserved.

Now, just as it appears his help has come, it also appears his time is vanishing. And this makes the "Romo loyalist" uncomfortable. Instead of enjoying this remarkable surprise that has been dropped in Dallas - the dynamic duo of a rookie RB and a rookie QB that together look to be too much for opponents to deal with in their first few months together and a promise of a new exciting era that could be awfully special - the Romo loyalist is looking for details that make a win in Pittsburgh less impressive from a QB standpoint.

They point to missed throws. They point to Zeke as an unfair advantage. They want their guy back as soon as possible because this new guy is just on a hot streak. Surely, you aren't suggesting Romo is not better than this guy, Bob.

I really don't get it.

Dak Prescott just stood tall and dueled against Roethlisberger on his turf. You may recall he just did the same with Aaron Rodgers on his turf. The last thing this guy needs is people to make excuses for him. Prescott is busy beating blitzes and staring down linebackers to make throws to move the chains. I don't think he needs to answer about the details along the way.

This sport is amazingly difficult and the way the Cowboys executed in the 2nd half and down the stretch of that game to pull a win out in the most hostile of circumstances was something that Troy Aikman, Romo, or just about any QB should be proud of. A win in Pittsburgh in the Roethlisberger era is a rare treat for a road QB, let alone a rookie QB.

And let's not undersell the degree of difficulty.

Late in the 3rd Quarter, the Cowboys faced a 3rd and 1, but just when you thought Elliott had move the chains, Ron Leary was flagged for a holding that made it a 3rd and 11 from midfield. They were down 18-16 at the time and they were now well out of field goal range. So, your options are to play it safe and punt or to trust your rookie to decode the blitz and find the right place to go to try to extend the drive. In other words, this is asking a rookie QB to pass a test that franchise QBs are expected to pass.

The Steelers sent their best pressure in a layered attack. Both inside linebackers and a safety head up the middle to try to get Prescott. Then, two of the front will fade back into the shallow passing lanes, because a rookie QB will dump it short and they can get an easy interception if they step in the path. Lance Dunbar was asked to step in front of the truck that is Ryan Shazier and just push him enough to let Prescott slide over.

Here is the moment. Prescott is doing the calculations in his head. He knows they can't send a safety and have anything beyond Cover 1 behind it. That means if he spots the safety that he can throw away from it into a safe spot. He has to buy a split-second as chaos happens around him. He now knows that Dez Bryant is the best option and he lays out a pass to Bryant that flies 50 yards in the air and lands right on the stride. It couldn't have been more perfect. Touchdown.

It required pocket presence, astute reads, and the a perfect throw. There are many ways to screw that up against a big blitz on 3rd and 11 in a game that is on the road in a loud stadium.

Instead, it gave the Cowboys a lead. This kid is good.

Again, I think it bears pointing out another time that this isn't about Prescott alone. It is about what the coaching staff tells us about him. There seems to be no harness where they pull back and ask him not to try this throw or this situation. This conservative coaching staff appears to no longer believe in conservatism. They have crossed the aisle into aggressiveness and going for the throat. What better example than that moment late in the 4th Quarter.

Down 24-23, they are squarely in field goal range. 2nd and 2 turns into 3rd and 8 when Shazier blows up a running play. We are also one play from the 2 minute warning. The Jason Garrett I know plays it safe and asks Dan Bailey to give his team the lead, even if he knows that Roethlisberger will not fear a 2-point margin with another chance at the ball.

Instead, they allow this rookie to make a throw on 3rd and 8 and perhaps risk the entire game on his arm and decision. How does he repay that faith?

Steelers send pressure, Cowboys put 5 receivers out. Easy math. 5 Pitt rushers and 5 Dallas receivers' means that the Steelers can only be in one coverage. It also means that he won't have long to get the ball out. Single-high, man under. So, Prescott waits for Jason Witten to get to the top of his stem on that Y-Option, has Shazier pinned to the inside and heads to the sideline where Prescott puts the pass right on his hands at the sticks.

That is a big-boy throw and a great catch. It likely converted the game from a loss to a win, although so much happened after that.

Roethlisberger did drive the Steelers down, but also might have scored too soon.

One last test for the two rookies was getting the ball into Bailey's range in just 42 seconds from the Dallas 25.

It might have been more complicated had the Steelers not generously grabbed two facemasks. We will never know if Bailey was going to make a long kick, because, of course, Zeke had one more absurd run left in him. Touchdown, Cowboys.

Game. Set. Match.

8-1. I am really out of explanations or descriptions. All I know is this train continues to not only roll, but to accelerate. I also know that Cowboys fans are split right now on how they feel about who is playing and who is under a blanket on the bench.

But, given that this is my 19th year covering this team, I will confirm that special seasons are increasingly rare around here.

I recommend getting on board. This team is very good and looks like they will have a thing or two to say about who is holding the Lombardi Trophy at the end of the year.

It would be a shame to waste this run with bickering about who isn't playing. Trust me, the coaches clearly believe in who is on the field right now. And if they have bought in, you might as well, too.

The writing is all over the walls and the field.

The future appears to be now.

Continue reading...

Man. This was an EXCELLENT article!!!!

And this excerpt was a diamond among jewels.

Now, just as it appears his help has come, it also appears his time is vanishing. And this makes the "Romo loyalist" uncomfortable. Instead of enjoying this remarkable surprise that has been dropped in Dallas - the dynamic duo of a rookie RB and a rookie QB that together look to be too much for opponents to deal with in their first few months together and a promise of a new exciting era that could be awfully special - the Romo loyalist is looking for details that make a win in Pittsburgh less impressive from a QB standpoint.

Boy, did he it!

 

[NextGenBoys]

Sturm, the best Dallas writer anywhere in the nation.

 

[PA Cowboy Fan]

Great article.

 

[Fletch]

This article was awesome from start to finish. Truly a great read.
I'm really surprised that not much, to anything was said about the officiating, and how blatantly pro Stealers the officials were. The fix was in for sure!

This team is humming. Team chemistry is the best it has ever been since the young, early 90's Cowboys. Glad to see Romo healthy. Having the best back up in the league is just absurd in this day and age. He'll be ready if he's called upon.

Enjoy it folks. It may or may not be this year, but it will be sooner than later when yours and my Dallas Cowboys hoist the Lombardi for the sixth time, and possibly a 7th and even 8th time.

 

[gimmesix]

I'm not sure I qualify as a Romo loyalist, but I certainly feel that I'm a Romo defender, so I'd like to answer the charge against the loyalists.

There seem to be many who have forgotten what a great quarterback Romo has been and don't believe a healthy Romo would be leading this team to the same kind of success. That is utter hogwash. There is nothing Romo has done that would indicate that this team would not be doing just as well or better with him at quarterback if he was healthy (which is the big question concerning him).

I am loyal to him in that I will always defend him against such unfounded charges. I still have yet to understand why it is necessary for part of the fan base to try to tear Romo down to build Dak up, or vice versa.

Maybe where I don't qualify as a loyalist is that I see little reason to reinsert Romo as the starter as long as we're winning. When a formula is working, you don't change one of the ingredients to try to make it better. If it stops working, though, we should be thankful that Romo can pat the rookie on the back, thank him for doing an absolutely fabulous job and take it from there.

What if it never stops working? Then all of us, Romo and Dak included, will be celebrating a Super Bowl victory.

There's no reason to make a change if that's where we are headed. Let's just not act like changing to Romo would be end of the world, either.

 

[Longboysfan]

 

[CCBoy]

Dak Prescott just stood tall and dueled against Roethlisberger on his turf. You may recall he just did the same with Aaron Rodgers on his turf. The last thing this guy needs is people to make excuses for him. Prescott is busy beating blitzes and staring down linebackers to make throws to move the chains

That was a beaut. Thanks for a fan raising post here.

The question recently used to be: Will the Cowboys be ready for the black n' blue December?

Who now, is doubting?

 

[big dog cowboy]

Great stuff but I was buying into this whole "The Future Is Now" thingy after we beat Cincy, GB and Philly in consecutive weeks.

 

[Crown Royal]

I'm not sure I qualify as a Romo loyalist, but I certainly feel that I'm a Romo defender, so I'd like to answer the charge against the loyalists.

There seem to be many who have forgotten what a great quarterback Romo has been and don't believe a healthy Romo would be leading this team to the same kind of success. That is utter hogwash. There is nothing Romo has done that would indicate that this team would not be doing just as well or better with him at quarterback if he was healthy (which is the big question concerning him).

I am loyal to him in that I will always defend him against such unfounded charges. I still have yet to understand why it is necessary for part of the fan base to try to tear Romo down to build Dak up, or vice versa.

Maybe where I don't qualify as a loyalist is that I see little reason to reinsert Romo as the starter as long as we're winning. When a formula is working, you don't change one of the ingredients to try to make it better. If it stops working, though, we should be thankful that Romo can pat the rookie on the back, thank him for doing an absolutely fabulous job and take it from there.

What if it never stops working? Then all of us, Romo and Dak included, will be celebrating a Super Bowl victory.

There's no reason to make a change if that's where we are headed. Let's just not act like changing to Romo would be end of the world, either.

Dak still can't make all the throws that Romo can make and probably doesn't see the field/have the technique that Romo does.

Romo can't physically do what Dak can do, and Dak likely keeps the offense honest and balanced.


To be quite honest, you likely get near or the same results regardless, which is the greatness of the offense right now. I'm a HUGE Romo fan, but I can't deny that I don't want to mess with what is working until teams show they have any idea of how to slow the offense down in it's current iteration.

 

[tyke1doe]

I'm not sure I qualify as a Romo loyalist, but I certainly feel that I'm a Romo defender, so I'd like to answer the charge against the loyalists.

There seem to be many who have forgotten what a great quarterback Romo has been and don't believe a healthy Romo would be leading this team to the same kind of success. That is utter hogwash. There is nothing Romo has done that would indicate that this team would not be doing just as well or better with him at quarterback if he was healthy (which is the big question concerning him).

I am loyal to him in that I will always defend him against such unfounded charges. I still have yet to understand why it is necessary for part of the fan base to try to tear Romo down to build Dak up, or vice versa.

Maybe where I don't qualify as a loyalist is that I see little reason to reinsert Romo as the starter as long as we're winning. When a formula is working, you don't change one of the ingredients to try to make it better. If it stops working, though, we should be thankful that Romo can pat the rookie on the back, thank him for doing an absolutely fabulous job and take it from there.

What if it never stops working? Then all of us, Romo and Dak included, will be celebrating a Super Bowl victory.

There's no reason to make a change if that's where we are headed. Let's just not act like changing to Romo would be end of the world, either.

I understand your perspective. But for me it boils down to the known vs. the unknown. We know what we have with Dak, i.e., and 8-1 record. We don't know what would have been had Romo been healthy from the start. We assume that if we put in Romo we wouldn't miss a beat, but that's not a certainty.

I say we continue with Dak and only insert Romo if Dak gets injured. I see no reason to return to Romo, especially since, from all indications, Dak is picking up the nuances of the game, learning at the speed of light and winning.

 

[Bleu Star]

Now, just as it appears his help has come, it also appears his time is vanishing. And this makes the "Romo loyalist" uncomfortable. Instead of enjoying this remarkable surprise that has been dropped in Dallas - the dynamic duo of a rookie RB and a rookie QB that together look to be too much for opponents to deal with in their first few months together and a promise of a new exciting era that could be awfully special - the Romo loyalist is looking for details that make a win in Pittsburgh less impressive from a QB standpoint.

They point to missed throws. They point to Zeke as an unfair advantage. They want their guy back as soon as possible because this new guy is just on a hot streak. Surely, you aren't suggesting Romo is not better than this guy, Bob.

I really don't get it.

Neither do I sir... Neither do I...

I don't think I could have said this any better in a million years. Get out of my head Sturm.

 

[Clove]

Sturm, you are the man.

 

[Eddie]

So out of curiosity ...is this a do or die season? Is our window THIS year and THIS year only ???

 

[visionary]

Dak still can't make all the throws that Romo can make and probably doesn't see the field/have the technique that Romo does.

Romo can't physically do what Dak can do, and Dak likely keeps the offense honest and balanced.


To be quite honest, you likely get near or the same results regardless, which is the greatness of the offense right now. I'm a HUGE Romo fan, but I can't deny that I don't want to mess with what is working until teams show they have any idea of how to slow the offense down in it's current iteration.

I agree
After all that Romo has been through I would LOVE for him to get a SB but in the end it is about the Cowboys

 

[visionary]

So out of curiosity ...is this a do or die season? Is our window THIS year and THIS year only ???

No one knows
We know we have this year so that is what you play for

 

[CCBoy]

Tony Romo will suit up for the first time this season when the Cowboys take on the Ravens in Week 11. But, as you’ve probably heard by now, he’ll be backing up Dak Prescott. It should be clear that the Cowboys are Prescott’s team now, yesterday’s comeback win against the Steelers sealed it.

Even Romo himself is acknowledging that fact.

The veteran quarterback told Stephen Jones after Sunday’s win, as Prescott walked the two of them: "That ain't (blank) easy, and he's the man."

https://mg.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=4tkefjih0jpv0#7623056371

 

[gimmesix]

Dak still can't make all the throws that Romo can make and probably doesn't see the field/have the technique that Romo does.

Romo can't physically do what Dak can do, and Dak likely keeps the offense honest and balanced.


To be quite honest, you likely get near or the same results regardless, which is the greatness of the offense right now. I'm a HUGE Romo fan, but I can't deny that I don't want to mess with what is working until teams show they have any idea of how to slow the offense down in it's current iteration.

I think this is where the majority of rational fans stand. We understand that Dak is a work in progress compared to Romo as far as his quarterback skills go, but we also understand that the rookie has led us to an 8-1 record so there's no reason to mess with that progress.

We know what Romo can do, but we don't know how Romo's health will hold up, so letting the young guy with the fresh legs run the show might be for the best. It's working so stick with it until it isn't.

 

[gimmesix]

I understand your perspective. But for me it boils down to the known vs. the unknown. We know what we have with Dak, i.e., and 8-1 record. We don't know what would have been had Romo been healthy from the start. We assume that if we put in Romo we wouldn't miss a beat, but that's not a certainty.

I say we continue with Dak and only insert Romo if Dak gets injured. I see no reason to return to Romo, especially since, from all indications, Dak is picking up the nuances of the game, learning at the speed of light and winning.

I think whether we'd miss a beat would depend on Romo's health and conditioning. I have what he did in 2014 to show me what he can do with an offense like this. Even last year not at his best, we were 3-1 when he played. I think assuming we wouldn't miss a beat with Romo is pretty close to a certainty based on what we do know about him as a quarterback. The only uncertainty for me is the health factor.

However, I agree that there's no reason to return to Romo as long as we keep winning. We've been good enough to overcome it when Dak makes mistakes and he's played a key part in that. There's no reason to change the engine out unless it starts backfiring.