DMN: Todd Archer: Patrick Crayton speaks the truth in saying Wade PHillips too 'soft'

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,813
Reaction score
47,819
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
10:30 AM CDT on Saturday, October 23, 2010
SportsDayDFW.com

Cowboys beat writer Todd Archer answered your questions in a chat Friday. Here are some highlights.

Todd asks ... Do you take what Patrick Crayton said seriously, or is this a case of him getting a few parting shots at his former team?

Todd Archer: Actually, I don't think Patrick Crayton was taking shots. I think he was speaking the truth. We've known Wade Phillips does not have any input on the offensive game plan. The coach has said as much this year and that's not too much of a surprise. Sean Payton is not in Gregg Williams' ear putting the defense together in New Orleans. As far as Phillips letting things slide, again, I think he's telling the truth. Players like coaches who treat them like men, and that's what Phillips will do. The problem sometimes is that there are players that have not earned that kind of trust. I think that's what Crayton was getting at.

Rick asks ... If Dallas loses Monday, why not fire Wade and see what Garrett can do in 10 games as interim coach? Why on earth not?

Todd Archer: Jerry Jones has consistently said Wade Phillips is safe. I understand your reasoning and might agree with you but I don't see it happening. Sorry.

Read more: http://www.***BANNED-URL***/sharedc...stories/102310dnspoarcherchat3.1b6e8ef61.html

Click here to read the entire chat
 
Todd Archer: Patrick Crayton speaks the truth in saying Wade Phillips too 'soft'
10:30 AM CDT on Saturday, October 23, 2010

SportsDayDFW.com
Cowboys beat writer Todd Archer answered your questions in a chat Friday. Here are some highlights.

Todd asks ... Do you take what Patrick Crayton said seriously, or is this a case of him getting a few parting shots at his former team?

Todd Archer: Actually, I don't think Patrick Crayton was taking shots. I think he was speaking the truth. We've known Wade Phillips does not have any input on the offensive game plan. The coach has said as much this year and that's not too much of a surprise. Sean Payton is not in Gregg Williams' ear putting the defense together in New Orleans. As far as Phillips letting things slide, again, I think he's telling the truth. Players like coaches who treat them like men, and that's what Phillips will do. The problem sometimes is that there are players that have not earned that kind of trust. I think that's what Crayton was getting at.

Read more: http://www.***BANNED-URL***/sharedc...tories/102310dnspoarcherchat3.1b6e8ef61.html?
 
Looks like "soft" was not used in the actual blog post by Archer or in the chat that the blog post references. Whoever wrote the headline to the blog post used it. I wonder if that was edited by someone other than Archer, who was unaware of the "issue."
 
theogt;3640998 said:
Looks like "soft" was not used in the actual blog post by Archer or in the chat that the blog post references. Whoever wrote the headline to the blog post used it. I wonder if that was edited by someone other than Archer, who was unaware of the "issue."
Headlines are typically written by Editors...which was sorta my point in the other thread.
 
Rick asks ... If Dallas loses Monday, why not fire Wade and see what Garrett can do in 10 games as interim coach? Why on earth not?

Todd Archer: Jerry Jones has consistently said Wade Phillips is safe. I understand your reasoning and might agree with you but I don't see it happening. Sorry.


I don't understand why Wade would be fired. If you do take Crayton at his word, that Wade is ONLY defense and Garrett is ONLY offense, and since people seem to equate penalties with a lack of discipline, then let's look at the penalties.

(if my count via NFL.com's play-by-play is right)
Penalties Enforced Against Dallas: 50

Special Teams: 6
Defense: 15
Offense: 29

Granted, some penalties hurt more than others (like PI, or holding on a big return on special teams, or TD nullifying penalties), but going just by the numbers, I'd say that Garrett has far more issues with discipline than Wade.
 
Umm Crayton never said Wade Phillips is soft... Way to go Archer, you idiot.

Yet another example of dumb Dallas media.


:rolleyes:
 
SDCowboy85;3641037 said:
Crayton needs to worry about his own 2-4 team.

So when they ask him a question about the differences between Wade and Norv, he should just keep silent... He was asked a question and he answered it...
 
khiladi;3641130 said:
So when they ask him a question about the differences between Wade and Norv, he should just keep silent... He was asked a question and he answered it...

Pass the on question. I'm not saying what he said was wrong but some questions are best avoided.
 
EPL0c0;3641025 said:
Granted, some penalties hurt more than others (like PI, or holding on a big return on special teams, or TD nullifying penalties), but going just by the numbers, I'd say that Garrett has far more issues with discipline than Wade.

That is a valid point. JG seems to have a bigger issue with accountability of his players then Wade does.
 
ThreeSportStar80;3641092 said:
Umm Crayton never said Wade Phillips is soft... Way to go Archer, you idiot.

Yet another example of dumb Dallas media.


:rolleyes:

Where did Archer say that he did?

Oh, he didn't.

Another example of fans not reading what the reporters actually said in the chat but instead read a headline and then took a shot at the big bad reporter.
 
WoodysGirl;3641000 said:
Headlines are typically written by Editors...which was sorta my point in the other thread.

Not sorta, WG. It WAS your point. It went unrecognized by choice for some.
 
EPL0c0;3641025 said:
I don't understand why Wade would be fired. If you do take Crayton at his word, that Wade is ONLY defense and Garrett is ONLY offense, and since people seem to equate penalties with a lack of discipline, then let's look at the penalties.

(if my count via NFL.com's play-by-play is right)
Penalties Enforced Against Dallas: 50

Special Teams: 6
Defense: 15
Offense: 29

Granted, some penalties hurt more than others (like PI, or holding on a big return on special teams, or TD nullifying penalties), but going just by the numbers, I'd say that Garrett has far more issues with discipline than Wade.

Doomsday;3641149 said:
That is a valid point. JG seems to have a bigger issue with accountability of his players then Wade does.

Only in Dallas is a coordinator more responsible for instilling dicipline than the HC. If JG tried to do things his way then he'd be accused of undermining the HC. It was posted a couple of weeks ago that JG wanted to run a play until the offense got it right and he was over ruled by Wade who just went on to the next play. The guy just can't win and now gets blamed for an area that is the domain of the guy who took the HC job. If we're going to blame Garrett, then just get rid of Wade and let JG run the show.
 
Editors are responsible for headlines, but since we don't usually know who the editor is, we take it out on the writer/reporter.

Archer probably isn't to blame, but he is the the only one with a name near the article.

Shoot the one we know.
 
Dodger12;3641196 said:
Only in Dallas is a coordinator more responsible for instilling dicipline than the HC. If JG tried to do things his way then he'd be accused of undermining the HC. It was posted a couple of weeks ago that JG wanted to run a play until the offense got it right and he was over ruled by Wade who just went on to the next play. The guy just can't win and now gets blamed for an area that is the domain of the guy who took the HC job. If we're going to blame Garrett, then just get rid of Wade and let JG run the show.
Garrett is the OC and assistant head coach....he can and should dole out discipline
 
Back
Top