yimyammer
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,574
- Reaction score
- 7,004
I was thinking about why so many of our players seem to not want to take charge and be the leader of the team and then I got to thinking about how quickly teams that Parcells built fall apart after his departure (not saying we've fallen as much as other teams he's been a part of, but we clearly have issues that I am not sure what the cause of is).
It seems to me that the buck clearly stops with Parcells whenever he is coach or even in whatever he is in Miami. He has an imposing persona and definately makes it clear what is expected and how things are going to work. In other words, he is the leader & general of his teams and everyone knows they are accountable to him and are therefore merely "soldiers" under his command.
When Parcells leaves a team, does he leave a leadership vacuum that none of the players are equipped to fill?
I'm sure I'm overlooking a lot of great players, but the only one that really comes to mind is Lawrence Taylor (but even his team fell off rather quickly after Parcells left).
I'm not trying to start a thread about how good or bad Parcells is and merely want to discuss whether this might be an unforeseen consequence of his departure.
Footnote:
When a person is told exactly what to do and not deviate from a certain course of action or they suffer severe consequences for not obeying, I think that person develops a mentality of dependence upon who tells them what they need to do and think. Once that authoritarion figure is removed, they are not equipped for the type of independent thinking required to continue to survive and thrive on their own. It kind of reminds me of pastors kids I grew up with. Once they got out from under the thumb of their restrictive home life, they went berzerk for a time until they came back full circle and realized why they were taught what they were taught and embraced what they formally resented because of the pain they incurred by deviating from the authoritarion guidance they were raised with.
It's kind of interesting to hear some of the players say they need a tougher hand or quoting Parcells, kind of reminds me of those pastors kids that came full circle
It seems to me that the buck clearly stops with Parcells whenever he is coach or even in whatever he is in Miami. He has an imposing persona and definately makes it clear what is expected and how things are going to work. In other words, he is the leader & general of his teams and everyone knows they are accountable to him and are therefore merely "soldiers" under his command.
When Parcells leaves a team, does he leave a leadership vacuum that none of the players are equipped to fill?
I'm sure I'm overlooking a lot of great players, but the only one that really comes to mind is Lawrence Taylor (but even his team fell off rather quickly after Parcells left).
I'm not trying to start a thread about how good or bad Parcells is and merely want to discuss whether this might be an unforeseen consequence of his departure.
Footnote:
When a person is told exactly what to do and not deviate from a certain course of action or they suffer severe consequences for not obeying, I think that person develops a mentality of dependence upon who tells them what they need to do and think. Once that authoritarion figure is removed, they are not equipped for the type of independent thinking required to continue to survive and thrive on their own. It kind of reminds me of pastors kids I grew up with. Once they got out from under the thumb of their restrictive home life, they went berzerk for a time until they came back full circle and realized why they were taught what they were taught and embraced what they formally resented because of the pain they incurred by deviating from the authoritarion guidance they were raised with.
It's kind of interesting to hear some of the players say they need a tougher hand or quoting Parcells, kind of reminds me of those pastors kids that came full circle