ethiostar
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,309
- Reaction score
- 46
I posted a similar thread on a different site and thought i post it here as well.
Going from Arizona to Dallas can either motivate Davis or puts him under so much pressure he might not be able to handle it. We don't know this for sure but the consensus on this forum is that he is a much more productive OG position for him than a OT and thats where i would like to see him, RG.
if that's the case, it means the cowboys would have Davis and kosier to play the guard postions with proctor and berger as backups (both of whom seem to be highly regarded by the coaching staff as young players with very good potential). Therefore, the question is does Dallas go for OT in the draft, especially if they don't sign Colombo? Maybe Sears or Stanley? Because after Adams we only have P. Mc Quistan (and fabini) as backups for the OT position. This way you can have a competition for the starting RT spot between McQuistan and Sears/Stanley and the loser can be a backup.
Going from Arizona to Dallas can either motivate Davis or puts him under so much pressure he might not be able to handle it. We don't know this for sure but the consensus on this forum is that he is a much more productive OG position for him than a OT and thats where i would like to see him, RG.
if that's the case, it means the cowboys would have Davis and kosier to play the guard postions with proctor and berger as backups (both of whom seem to be highly regarded by the coaching staff as young players with very good potential). Therefore, the question is does Dallas go for OT in the draft, especially if they don't sign Colombo? Maybe Sears or Stanley? Because after Adams we only have P. Mc Quistan (and fabini) as backups for the OT position. This way you can have a competition for the starting RT spot between McQuistan and Sears/Stanley and the loser can be a backup.