Terence Newman700;1303457 said:Do u guys think we could be dangerous with....Crayton, Hurd, and Miles as our top 3 recievers?? and with witten still here??
i wonder if teams would respect us like they do now.....
Terence Newman700;1303473 said:Austin is pretty fast tho....and big.....
and hurd is like a Keyshawn only faster
DipChit;1303477 said:Maybe we could start Kincade at RB too... then we'd have a 7th and 2 undrafted guys as our top 3 receivers, Kincade as an undrafted RB, Hoyte as an undrafted FB, and Romo as an undrafted QB.
That'd be kinda wild huh.
If that happens we HAVE to acquire another receiver no ifs and or buts about it.Terence Newman700;1303482 said:lmao..im just saying..what if Glenn says screw this n retires..n parcellls says screw TO....do u think those 3 could do something?
windward;1303492 said:If that happens we HAVE to acquire another receiver no ifs and or buts about it.
Terence Newman700;1303457 said:Do u guys think we could be dangerous with....Crayton, Hurd, and Miles as our top 3 recievers?? and with witten still here??
i wonder if teams would respect us like they do now.....
sbark;1303921 said:I think what really help N.O. cast of WR's is the RB tandem, but especially Bush..........
It keeps the LB's honest, they just cannot drop to deep and yet contain Bush, that in turn opens up the feild alot more for the WR's and TE's to play chess games............
I would love to see the Boys' add a "poor mans" RB even in the same hemisphere as Bush to mix in the flow of the game..........our RB's are the last thought of opposing Defenders.........basically lets the LB's help deny TO and TG, and crowd witten
Terence Newman700;1303457 said:Do u guys think we could be dangerous with....Crayton, Hurd, and Miles as our top 3 recievers?? and with witten still here??
i wonder if teams would respect us like they do now.....