ologan;4514377 said:Nothing to see here....Move on!
ologan;4514377 said:Nothing to see here....Move on!
ologan;4514377 said:Nothing to see here....Move on!
rash;4514354 said:Does McNabb deserve to be in the HOF?
ShiningStar;4515117 said:Even if you dont have a ring, which is more of the team, the stats matter, the problem is the game changes and as the game changes it becomes easier to alter stats. So the question is where do you draw the lines and where do you caterogize those that are HoF and those that are very good? who is the marker?
zrinkill;4515513 said:Probably the hardest QB to bring down after he was in the grasp of all time ...... even over the Rapist.
daboyzruleperiod;4515530 said:I believe McRib and Cunningham’s careers to be almost identical. They both were very good qb’s on talent loaded teams that just couldn’t pull the trigger in the big games.
Hall of famers do, and with less talent surrounding them. Only Greats make the HOF, being good and very good doesn't.
’ I’m 34, 35 years old but still, I played at the pinnacle, I played at the highest level of my career. I played there. And I would vote for myself for the Hall of Fame.”
“Peyton never won the big game until he won the Super Bowl finally. Dan Marino never won the big game. But does that mean his career is a failure? No. Not at all,” McNabb said. “When you sit and look at the numbers — and that’s what it is when it comes to the Hall of Fame — my numbers are better than Jim Kelly, better than Troy Aikman, better than a lot of guys in the Hall of Fame, but the one thing they do have is a Super Bowl.
Sorry for you're misery McRib, sux not having a job and ummm, not to "finally" win the Super Bowl EVER.
You may now join TO's...I was the greatest and have no ring to show for it cry baby club. Now go vote yourself in.![]()
