I don't think they will position it that way but will restrict greatly how much a runner can be assisted including on a QB sneak to deal with this so it is really just a QB sneak nowI believe the vote is today...what's your call?
I think the chance of injury is high and you can't even practice against it, because of this.I am not sure if they will stop it, at least not today, since so far there have been no injuries and there is a valid argument around the idea that it's football and the defense should learn how to stop it.
That said, I have often wondered if an offense might not try that strategy regularly, not just in short-yard situations.
For example, bring your strongest lineman (offense and defense) on the field and have them form a bubble that pushes down field while 2-3 of them protect the back and side areas.
When the defenses counter by fielding all of their big guys, then you could focus on adding in your fastest lineman with great hands to function as eligible receivers and pass the ball to them.
If a team could average 5+ yards per play, they would control the clock and methodically drive down the field and score.
Fans of course would hate watching that type of football for much or most of the game which would ultimately hurt the NFL's product and drive them to put a stop to it.
In the meantime, the counter arguments will remain .. teams only use it rarely in short yardage situations and there have been no major injuries from it.
Until either of those changes, there will likely be enough NFL teams to vote in support of it.
NO, It's not illegal,I believe the vote is today...what's your call?
I hope so. It's getting players injured. It was never a good idea when they started allowing it, 2006 I think it was.I believe the vote is today...what's your call?
Why not? It was illegal until recently.It will but it shouldn’t.
I'm not sure that you're wrong, as a lot of people smarter than me have said something similar. My question though is has anyone actually been injured during this play? It just seems to me that this play has been ran several times every week for the last two seasons so we should have a decent sample size to gauge this type of injury risk from a pool of data. I just dont remember hearing about anyone getting seriously injured from this play. The inability to practice against it is very real, but that's also 90% of plays anymore with the the bulk of practices being just shells.I think the chance of injury is high and you can't even practice against it, because of this.
Fly eagle flyIt will but it shouldn’t.
That's very true and I think at some point especially when the game is on the line, one or more players on the defense are going to get more aggressive toward legs and knees which could lead to some serious injuries.I think the chance of injury is high and you can't even practice against it, because of this.
Didn't Hurts sustain his injury running it?That's very true and I think at some point especially when the game is on the line, one or more players on the defense are going to get more aggressive toward legs and knees which could lead to some serious injuries.
The problem is that so far, serious injuries have not occurred so it makes it easy for half the league to support allowing it.
Yup. Same reason they banned horse collar tackles.They should ban it for the same reason they banned catapult plays. It creates unnecessary risk to player safety.