BroGreg
New Member
- Messages
- 47
- Reaction score
- 0
I'm not his greatest fan by any means.
But I think there was more to Philly then meets the eye and I talked this out with someone and made them go hhhmmm....
Let me as this question.
How many times after a game has an announcement come in the form of "They won it for him" "They did this or that for him"... meaning another players like a QB or what have you?
TO worked his *** off to get back for the Super Bowl.
You can't take that away from the guy and needs to included in your calcuation of his character.
Just like Keyshawn found a bright spot with us and made some key and sacrificial catches. If you haven't noticed then you have blinded your view with hate.
With that said....
What will you do IF... IF... now... if we get TO and it works?
What if he HELPS to take us to a new level. Keyword is HELPS.
He could be the key as someone said in another thread to open up the game.
With him we can open up Glenn more Crayton, Julius, Barber, Witten, DEF gets a rest if we don't score too fast, etc..
Again... keyword is help.
You mean to tell me you want be cheering this guy to score?
Considering how a owner, whose name I won't mention is doing just about every desperate signing he can to win a Super Bowl, why not bring in TO.
TO was unhappy as many receivers when he isn't given the chance to win the game like he know he can. We've had it an I'll take it again.
I don't see TO, blowing up as a Cowboy as negative as he did with the Eagles, because we have more to win with in my opinion. They had TO and Westbrook and then tried to pretend because they won 2 playoff games without TO that TO wasn't what took them over the top.
I'm sorry. You can hate TO, but that is BS!!!
The numbers speak for themselves and I really think despite his childish approach to that situation that he could be very productive with our team.
Will he hiccup? More than likely, but I don't see him doing the same thing as he did with the Eagles.
But I think there was more to Philly then meets the eye and I talked this out with someone and made them go hhhmmm....
Let me as this question.
How many times after a game has an announcement come in the form of "They won it for him" "They did this or that for him"... meaning another players like a QB or what have you?
TO worked his *** off to get back for the Super Bowl.
You can't take that away from the guy and needs to included in your calcuation of his character.
Just like Keyshawn found a bright spot with us and made some key and sacrificial catches. If you haven't noticed then you have blinded your view with hate.
With that said....
What will you do IF... IF... now... if we get TO and it works?
What if he HELPS to take us to a new level. Keyword is HELPS.
He could be the key as someone said in another thread to open up the game.
With him we can open up Glenn more Crayton, Julius, Barber, Witten, DEF gets a rest if we don't score too fast, etc..
Again... keyword is help.
You mean to tell me you want be cheering this guy to score?
Considering how a owner, whose name I won't mention is doing just about every desperate signing he can to win a Super Bowl, why not bring in TO.
TO was unhappy as many receivers when he isn't given the chance to win the game like he know he can. We've had it an I'll take it again.
I don't see TO, blowing up as a Cowboy as negative as he did with the Eagles, because we have more to win with in my opinion. They had TO and Westbrook and then tried to pretend because they won 2 playoff games without TO that TO wasn't what took them over the top.
I'm sorry. You can hate TO, but that is BS!!!
The numbers speak for themselves and I really think despite his childish approach to that situation that he could be very productive with our team.
Will he hiccup? More than likely, but I don't see him doing the same thing as he did with the Eagles.