cnuball21
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 11,938
- Reaction score
- 9,853
WR is one of the most premium and expensive positions in football. Should always be on the radar.Ditto with TE, safety, WR, RB .
WR is one of the most premium and expensive positions in football. Should always be on the radar.Ditto with TE, safety, WR, RB .
WR is tied with pass rusher as the 2nd highest paid position in the league. And not by accident. If you dont have them, you dont have an offenseDitto with TE, safety, WR, RB .
Highest paid position does not mean you draft a WR in the first round, just for the sake of drafting one.WR is tied with pass rusher as the 2nd highest paid position in the league. And not by accident. If you dont have them, you dont have an offense
There have been great players at every position drafted in the 2nd or 3rd rounds.Highest paid position does not mean you draft a WR in the first round, just for the sake of drafting one.
I think you draft based off grade ratings according to your draft board.
Mind you that teams vary when it comes to draft grades and value.
Some WRs will be on their draft boards, ..some WRs will Not be on their first round draft board.
I think you worry about "highest paid " when it comes time to negotiate that 2nd contract.
Pass rushers (especially 3 tech DTs) are always harder to find than wide receivers so they will be more of a premium demand.
And not going WR in the first round doesn't necessarily mean you're not drafting a WR early.
There's been a multitude of great FFL WRs that were picked in the 2nd and 3rd rounds.
Of course you have to stick to your board to an extent. But if a premium position player is available and is within a few rankings if a RB / OG / S etc you take the premium position…every time.Highest paid position does not mean you draft a WR in the first round, just for the sake of drafting one.
I think you draft based off grade ratings according to your draft board.
Mind you that teams vary when it comes to draft grades and value.
Some WRs will be on their draft boards, ..some WRs will Not be on their first round draft board.
I think you worry about "highest paid " when it comes time to negotiate that 2nd contract.
Pass rushers (especially 3 tech DTs) are always harder to find than wide receivers so they will be more of a premium demand.
And not going WR in the first round doesn't necessarily mean you're not drafting a WR early.
There's been a multitude of great FFL WRs that were picked in the 2nd and 3rd rounds.
There's not a pressing need for a WR in the first round, imo.There have been great players at every position drafted in the 2nd or 3rd rounds.
Who says we would be drafting one just to draft. There is a need. Gallup is probably gone next season and Cooks is a speed WR nearing 30. We could definitely afford to take a WR in the first
Agreed. That's the exception. ala CeeDee Lamb, despite Amari and Gallup already on the roster.Of course you have to stick to your board to an extent. But if a premium position player is available and is within a few rankings if a RB / OG / S etc you take the premium position…every time.
Yea. There aren’t any blue chippers this year outside or Anderson and Carter IMO so zero chance this year.Agreed. That's the exception. ala CeeDee Lamb, despite Amari and Gallup already on the roster.
You would pass on Robinson and give him to the Eagles? You very well would be giving yourself a lot of pain.Yea. There aren’t any blue chippers this year outside or Anderson and Carter IMO so zero chance this year.
It doesn’t have to be a blue chipper for me. If a top 20ish DE / OT / WR / CB falls Id take that player 10 times out of 10 over Bijan or the top G / TE in this class.