Dont rejoice too much (Anti TO crowd)

uhh cowboys#1 have you ever seen Ice? We dont call him Iceberg because he is cold ya know ............... its cause he sank the Titanic
 
zrinkill said:
uhh cowboys#1 have you ever seen Ice? We dont call him Iceberg because he is cold ya know ............... its cause he sank the Titanic
no your wrong CHUCK NORRIS sank the Titanic....
 
sandtrapp said:
Yea, Then they would really Kick our ***.
Man I can't understand some people.
Lets have a Happy team and be the laughing stock of the NFC East.
We suck ,but we're Happy.:insane:



I would rather we suck and be happy than to suck and be unhappy. If you think TO is going to make a super team out of the Cowboys by himself you might be in for a surprise.​
 
sandtrapp said:
Yea, Then they would really Kick our ***.
Man I can't understand some people.
Lets have a Happy team and be the laughing stock of the NFC East.
We suck ,but we're Happy.:insane:



Sandtrapp, I probably need to apologize. I forgot about all the SB rings TO has and all the teams that he won SB rings for them. And I forgot about how happy he made SF and the Eagles. I can't wait for the same happiness they enjoyed to now come to Dallas, and also all the SB rings they won during his 'happy' stint with them, come to Dallas. I am unhappy about losing. I will be unhappy about losing when TO brings his circus to town. WE have a preview now but wait until it is full blown.​
 
parchy said:
It just baffles me that people don't want a guy who would immediately put our team in the Super Bowl discussion.

Yes, because signing TO is going to fix the offensive line problems. Before the morons cut Key, WR was not a pressing issue.
 
JustSayNotoTO said:
Before the morons cut Key, WR was not a pressing issue.

Yes it was. In fact, it was arguably the most pressing issue on the entire roster. You're insane if you can't see that.
 
The WR's were fine, the linebackers, OL and FS were not, however. Teams do not need some superstar WR to win it all.
 
JustSayNotoTO said:
The WR's were fine, the linebackers, OL and FS were not, however. Teams do not need some superstar WR to win it all.

With our OL and QB, we do. There weren't going to be enough linemen on the market this year to make our line any better than middle of the road (which would be good enough to carry us through the playoffs), so a big time WR was going to be a must. Glenn is good but for a speed threat, he disappears a lot in big games and doesn't have an immediate impact when he needs to, just when he can. TO is unlike anything we've seen since the Playmaker.

Plus, Key and Glenn are both old and getting worse by the minute. Crayton is still a year away from being an everyday #1/2 guy, and with the age of the others, WR is arguably more pressing than any other position on the roster.
 
Right. WR is more pressing than OL? Who can throw the ball to our prima donnas if the OL sucks *** like it did last year?
 
parchy said:
It just baffles me that people don't want a guy who would immediately put our team in the Super Bowl discussion.

It''s baffling to me that you TO groupies don't have more self-respect...

Certainly, he has no respect for any of you...
 
JustSayNotoTO said:
Right. WR is more pressing than OL? Who can throw the ball to our prima donnas if the OL sucks *** like it did last year?

Right... the OL really blew that Seattle game... or the Week 2 game... if the Cowboys had a big-play WR, the o-line wouldn't have mattered. Get TO the ball in the first 5 yards and he turns it into 15 half the time.
 
cowboys#1 said:
you guys r full of crap, you know dam well after t o catches the first long bomb from bledsoe on monday night football vs the eagles u guys are gonna scream for joy...... hypocrites.....:D

You're an idiot if you think I'll ever feel anything for that piece of excrement but contempt... just the thought of him corrupting the team I love makes my blood boil...

Maybe you'll prostitute yourself to TO, but I won't... ever...
 
cowboys#1 said:
we didnt have an explosive weapon like T O
i know where your going with this so dont even try;)

Yeah, there's no point in trying to make a fool see reason...
 
JustSayNotoTO said:
Right. WR is more pressing than OL? Who can throw the ball to our prima donnas if the OL sucks *** like it did last year?

Dallas can address BOTH the oline, AND wide reciever positions. It doesnt have to be one or the other.
 
silverbear said:
It''s baffling to me that you TO groupies don't have more self-respect...

Certainly, he has no respect for any of you...

You know nothing about me, but you label me a TO groupie because I say one positive thing about him. Solid...

No well-known NFL player has any respect for any of us.
 
My god, get off TO's member allready, this stuff is sickening. The OL was the weak link of the team last season, along with the linebackers. WR is a luxury position. Controlling the LOS is what is important to winning games, but I guess collecting the most big name players is important to winning jersey sales. No SB without TO, and certainly none with TO. Wake me up when he retires.
 
JustSayNotoTO said:
My god, get off TO's member allready, this stuff is sickening. The OL was the weak link of the team last season, along with the linebackers. WR is a luxury position. Controlling the LOS is what is important to winning games, but I guess collecting the most big name players is important to winning jersey sales. No SB without TO, and certainly none with TO. Wake me up when he retires.

again, Dallas can address BOTH the oline AND wide reciever positions. Why does it have to be one or the other?
 
Props given to silverbear.

I don't want TO to be the main story of the nfc east next year. The rivalries should be the focus.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
464,639
Messages
13,823,775
Members
23,781
Latest member
Vloh10
Back
Top