MissouriCowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,479
- Reaction score
- 483
RS12;5044999 said:He wasnt a ball hawk at UT
RS12;5044999 said:He wasnt a ball hawk at UT
RS12;5044999 said:He wasnt a ball hawk at UT
xwalker;5045009 said:Agree. His Ints:
2012: 2
2011: 2
2010: 1
The article does nothing to follow up on the title.
People ignore this way too often when talking about him as a playmaking FS.Tobal;5045001 said:He played mostly in the slot
blackbull;5045242 said:Lol looks like most of you said enough. I don't even need to add. I'm just gonna laugh if we pick him.
Slot CBs do not generate a lot of turnovers. It definitely matters where a guy plays and how he is used.burmafrd;5045056 said:if he was capable of generating turnovers it would not matter where he played. He is not.
ABQCOWBOY;5045283 said:I think you need to go back and watch Vacarro play in his first two season at Texas. Watch him play before he went to the slot. That will give you a better idea of what kind of traditional Safety he can be.
The fact that he played in the slot does not hurt him either. It actually helps him a great deal. Average Safeties don't play in the slot in a passing conference like the Big 12. They come out and get subbed for by a CB.
Just so everybody understands what I'm saying, I'm not for taking a Safety in the 1st. I'm for taking the best player available at OL, DL or Safety. I'm just not as convinced as many of you are that Vacarro will not be that guy when our turn comes to pick.