Yes, which is why I have no idea what he said. That deal isn't done anyway. At least as far as I know.Future 585;1426037 said:Didnt the Packers say that they had no intentions of adding Rodgers into the Moss deal?
Hostile;1426034 said:Once again in English.
It does?dalboy;1426041 said:It means if they do the trade than the Raiders won't need a Qb and the Russell isn't the first pick overall.
Hostile;1426042 said:It does?
Okay, so you're saying that deal is a 100% guarantee? Based on what?
dalboy;1426047 said:No it is just that the Packers and Rodgers haven't been getting along Rodgers is fed up with Farve playing again plus what happend to him in his draft HA HA.:laugh1:
Again, I need a translator.dalboy;1426047 said:No it is just that the Packers and Rodgers haven't been getting along Rodgers is fed up with Farve playing again plus what happend to him in his draft HA HA.:laugh1: