Draft question

theogt;1360759 said:
Cool. Didn't know you had a site.
Still under construction really. Going to possibly make a magazine out of it. Have some neat features coming soon.
 
No 6th. The 6th we got from the Jets was CONDITIONAL based on the condition that he actually does something for the Jets. He didn't do anything for them so that conditional pick did not live up to its condition. Therefore no 6th since we gave the one we had for Fujita and the conditional pick for Hunter didn't turn out.
 
JFlgn;1360770 said:
No 6th. The 6th we got from the Jets was CONDITIONAL based on the condition that he actually does something for the Jets. He didn't do anything for them so that conditional pick did not live up to its condition. Therefore no 6th since we gave the one we had for Fujita and the conditional pick for Hunter didn't turn out.
This is what I believe too.
 
Hostile;1360773 said:
This is what I believe too.
After digging through Google for a few minutes, I don't think anyone has reported the official details of that trade. We'll likely only know for certain when draft picks are officially listed.
 
summerisfunner;1361647 said:
it means that your site has been under construction for awhile now :)
The database I'm building for it is huge.
 
JFlgn;1360770 said:
No 6th. The 6th we got from the Jets was CONDITIONAL based on the condition that he actually does something for the Jets. He didn't do anything for them so that conditional pick did not live up to its condition. Therefore no 6th since we gave the one we had for Fujita and the conditional pick for Hunter didn't turn out.

My recollection of this was that the 6th could have been in the 2006 draft if Hunter had stuck with the Jets, but it defaulted to a 6th in 2007 if he didn't.

Of course that's from a while back, so it could be IIRC.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
465,305
Messages
13,864,750
Members
23,788
Latest member
mattyice
Back
Top