TruBlueCowboy
New Member
- Messages
- 7,301
- Reaction score
- 0
You can do the math yourself and multiply each stat by 2 to see what it would have averaged out for the entire season.
1999 Patriots 2-6
1,671 yards, 6 TD, 17 INT, 141 COMP, 268 ATT, 52.6 COMP%, 52.94 QB Rating
2000 Patriots 3-5
1,643 yards, 7 TD, 7 INT, 152 COMP, 262 ATT, 58.0 COMP%, 74.33 QB Rating
2001 Patriots n/a
did not play
2002 Bills 3-5
1,859 yards, 8 TD, 10 INT, 172 COMP, 292 ATT, 58.9 COMP%, 72.56 QB Rating
2003 Bills 2-6
1,112 yards, 5 TD, 4 INT, 116 COMP, 215 ATT, 53.9 COMP%, 68.59 QB Rating
2004 Bills 2-6
1,457 yards, 11 TD, 9 INT, 131 COMP, 229 ATT, 57.2 COMP%, 75.90 QB Rating
2005 Cowboys 4-4
1,620 yards, 10 TD, 11 INT, 144 COMP, 255 ATT, 56.5 COMP%, 70.71 QB Rating
Not exactly the stats of a spectacular QB, are they? Makes you wonder why so many people defend Bledsoe until death when confronted with the Romo challenge.
Here's some more second half stats for you:
1,524 yards, 8 TD, 8 INT, 139 COMP, 213 ATT, 65.2 COMP%, 83.15 QB Rating
pretty similar numbers, much better accuracy, here's the big difference though
7-1
It was Tom Brady's year that he replaced Drew Bledsoe in 2001.
Some fellas just have that sixth sense to play QB. You've all seen Romo in the pocket. He has it. He may not have the arm strength of Bledsoe but Brady didn't either.
If Bill make the switch, it needs to be soon. Let Romo have most of his growing pains early while the defense is so strong and other offenses are struggling. If he really is the next starter for Dallas, he should be ready to roll in the second half, albeit with a more limited offense. (Don't sell him short though, he may not have regular season experience but he's been on this team for a while. This won't be like playing a rookie.)
1999 Patriots 2-6
1,671 yards, 6 TD, 17 INT, 141 COMP, 268 ATT, 52.6 COMP%, 52.94 QB Rating
2000 Patriots 3-5
1,643 yards, 7 TD, 7 INT, 152 COMP, 262 ATT, 58.0 COMP%, 74.33 QB Rating
2001 Patriots n/a
did not play
2002 Bills 3-5
1,859 yards, 8 TD, 10 INT, 172 COMP, 292 ATT, 58.9 COMP%, 72.56 QB Rating
2003 Bills 2-6
1,112 yards, 5 TD, 4 INT, 116 COMP, 215 ATT, 53.9 COMP%, 68.59 QB Rating
2004 Bills 2-6
1,457 yards, 11 TD, 9 INT, 131 COMP, 229 ATT, 57.2 COMP%, 75.90 QB Rating
2005 Cowboys 4-4
1,620 yards, 10 TD, 11 INT, 144 COMP, 255 ATT, 56.5 COMP%, 70.71 QB Rating
Not exactly the stats of a spectacular QB, are they? Makes you wonder why so many people defend Bledsoe until death when confronted with the Romo challenge.
Here's some more second half stats for you:
1,524 yards, 8 TD, 8 INT, 139 COMP, 213 ATT, 65.2 COMP%, 83.15 QB Rating
pretty similar numbers, much better accuracy, here's the big difference though
7-1
It was Tom Brady's year that he replaced Drew Bledsoe in 2001.
Some fellas just have that sixth sense to play QB. You've all seen Romo in the pocket. He has it. He may not have the arm strength of Bledsoe but Brady didn't either.
If Bill make the switch, it needs to be soon. Let Romo have most of his growing pains early while the defense is so strong and other offenses are struggling. If he really is the next starter for Dallas, he should be ready to roll in the second half, albeit with a more limited offense. (Don't sell him short though, he may not have regular season experience but he's been on this team for a while. This won't be like playing a rookie.)
