Im 50-50 on this. On one hand, having ET would have gotten us, at very least, past GB in 2016 and maybe to the big game. On the other hand, its the pick and its the oppurtunity cost of his contract. If we sign him to a big contract, do we not sign DLaw to a long-term? Irving? Dak and Zeke are coming up too.
Soon to be 29 wanting 11 mil a year...
Seattle asking for #50 ..is it worth the pick? hes getting older & would probably need a 4 year 44-50mil contract....with Martin, Dak, Lawrence all needing contracts next year..would you pull the trigger?
Dez was going to be cut and it was a move to get rid of a player that was not playing good enough to justify his big contract. Dez has said that he would have taken a pay cut to stay in Dallas, but Jerry didn't even let any negotiations begin. They could have afforded both Dez and Thomas, but they didn't want to put up with Dez and the extra baggage that comes with him.Remember that they cut Dez, so some of that money could be used for Thomas. They will have plenty of money. The only question becomes what they do with Zack Martin when he comes due. My guess is that they can't keep Martin and D-Law if they sign Thomas, but we'll have to see what the cap situation is by that point (likely no Witten and we'll be mostly out and under from Romo). I'd still do the trade and hope for the best. Not a lot of good Free Safeties coming down the pike in this draft and in general. Thomas would give us a playmaker and a locker room presence with leadership and a ring.
