Emmitt Smith's rushing record faces a rare, though still unlikely, challenger

Phil did in 92, I am watching game 2 now, they said dallas was 1-6 against phil, and emmitt had never got 100 yds or more against Phil. Phil won the 1st game in 92 like 34-10.
After this game 2 I will watch the playoff game with phil and SF, Dallas had big edge as they were top seed, only had to play twice then SB. And both games in Tx stadium.
I was thinking who in the heck is Phil. LOL.
 
If the NFL extends to 18 game seasons the record could fall. It would always have an asterisk if it happens, but the extra games could certainly make a difference.
The difference more games could make is to *shorten* careers.

After a certain point, more snaps per season leads to fewer snaps over a career. Players just get ground down with too much punishment over a season.
 
Henry has the odds against him. Injury could derail him. His running style and the wear and tear.
 
People just don't play that way any more... just handing off over and over and over.

Certainly not in the Walter Payton or Barry Sanders skill category, but the record meant something to him and he stayed durable enough so he just kept hammering away year after year to get it, and he earned it.

Barry just didn't care. (Sacrificed records to be able to walk when he was 70)
I will die on this hill. I saw both backs play in their prime:

Barry was faster, more elusive, and more talented.

And: Emmitt Smith was the BETTER back.

Emmitt was more punishing, had better vision, better hands, and more will to win. Period.

I challenge anyone to watch Emmitt's highlight reel and tell me with absolute certainty: there was a better RB. Ever.
 
Zeke really was hell on wheels for 4 years. He kept around a 4.6 average AND his receiving and pass blocking set him above Henry.....but after 4 years he was shot and Henry just keeps defying father time.

In 2018 Zeke had 77 receptions and over 300 carries.....not many backs have done that in a single season.
 
I will die on this hill. I saw both backs play in their prime:

Barry was faster, more elusive, and more talented.

And: Emmitt Smith was the BETTER back.

Emmitt was more punishing, had better vision, better hands, and more will to win. Period.

I challenge anyone to watch Emmitt's highlight reel and tell me with absolute certainty: there was a better RB. Ever.
There were better RBs. Quote a few.

It's easy to have good vision when ur OL is blowing the defenders 5 yards backwards.

I agree with you when you said "Barry us more talented" though.

Just imagine Emmits career if he'd been drafted by the Jets, or Seahawks, or, or, the Lions.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
465,772
Messages
13,897,323
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top