cowboyjoe
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 28,435
- Reaction score
- 757
cowboyjoe;3737899 said:wow Hostile had better listen to the very last of this interview, with comparisions of Kitna in leadership next to Tony Romo.
SDCowboy85;3737923 said:Their opinion lost all credibility when they talked about Romo not taking hits from the media. That's all he does it take hits (especially from the source of this interview). He also said Romo shows no camaraderie with his teammates. So much EPSN fail there it's not even funny.
So Romo's faulted for being everybody's buddy but then he's faulted by some for not being their friend "enough"...If someone thinks he could be a better leader that's fine the guy just can't seem to win.RoyTheHammer;3737941 said:Not to start this up again, but this is a guy who's in the locker room and can see what's going on. Its just one guy's opinion and he could very well be mistaken, but just so some realize its more than just "one or two idiot fans" on the board here who have some concerns.
Just to clarify as well, he didn't say Romo had no camaraderie with his teammates, just that Romo is very "cliquish". He has a good relationship with a small group of players, however Kitna has a great camaraderie with pretty much all his teammates. He said he doesn't think there's "any question" that Kitna has a better relationship with the team than Romo.
He also said that people will say Aikman wasn't that type of friendly guy with all his teammates, but Aikman was "a butt kicker".
Romo is neither a guy who will be a "butt kicker" or a guy who has great camaraderie with his teammates either. That's what Tim says the problem with, that he is neither of those personality types.
He also said its hard to ask a guy to be something he's not, but as reserved as Tony is, and as withdrawn from his teammates as he is.. he doesn't seem like he can be a great leader.
This is coming from a guy who follows the team closely and is inside the locker room. Not saying he's right or wrong, but there are others who see what some of us "morons" on the board here see.
SDCowboy85;3737943 said:So Romo's faulted for being everybody's buddy but then he's faulted by some for not being their friend "enough"...If someone thinks he could be a better leader that's fine the guy just can't seem to win.
RoyTheHammer;3737948 said:I think what Tim was trying to say was that he's not everyone's buddy in the locker room. That's part of the problem, the lack of camaraderie with his teammates like Kitna has.
That second sentance is more true than anything else unfortunately.
SDCowboy85;3737950 said:That's what I'm saying. People complain that he's too buddy-with his teammates and needs to break away from that and then Tim complains that Romo isn't buddy with enough players. It's just like some people say Romo isn't serious enough and then when he is shown being "serious" he's suddenly moping. The guy literally can't win. Some see him too much one way and bash him and others don't see him that way enough and bash him for that. It's like coo-coo land when it comes with this team.
You're giving MacMahon way too much credit. These guys aren't unbiased observers, or at least MacMahon isn't -- he's just as biased as posters here who dig in a position and refuse to change it no matter what.RoyTheHammer;3737941 said:This is coming from a guy who follows the team closely and is inside the locker room. Not saying he's right or wrong, but there are others who see what some of us "morons" on the board here see.
Chocolate Lab;3737968 said:You're giving MacMahon way too much credit. These guys aren't unbiased observers, or at least MacMahon isn't -- he's just as biased as posters here who dig in a position and refuse to change it no matter what.
I suspect the reason MacMahon says this about Romo is the same reason he hates Barber -- because he doesn't talk to the press "enough". It's just like when JJT tried to talk his readers into agreeing that Romo should be bashed for not speaking on the Wade fire/Jason hire.
Idgit;3738031 said:*****. Not this again. Now Romo's not a leader because Tim McMahon says he doesn't play cards and lead bible study in the locker room. Got it. Don't care what he thinks on the issue.
And McMahon is *not* a guy in the locker room. He's an ESPN employee who happens to contradict what the coaches and teammates say on this topic. There's a reason why the backup QB has time to play dominoes when the starter does not. And the 'cliquish' accusations surfaced back in 2008 when there was the issue with TO. Funny how they crop back up with Romo injured and Kitna playing well. It's almost like someone who works for ESPN has a reason to create drama to cover when it comes to the Cowboys.
I have no doubt that Kitna's more outgoing than Tony is. That stuff doesn't matter when it comes to playing on Sundays. Tony's well-liked and a very, very good QB. He's got his team's support, and his coaches support, and the organization's support. That's the only thing that matters at the end of the day.
RoyTheHammer;3738034 said:Tim spent 6 years at the DMN before joining ESPN. The guy has been around the locker room and around these players plenty.
I acknowledged that there are guys who speak to the leadership of Tony, yet somehow i figured anyone speaking against his leadership ability would not be acknowledged by the other side. Makes sense..
Tony is liked by some, i certainly wouldn't say by most though. He is a very good QB as well. We agree there.
You say that stuff doesn't matter when it comes to playing on Sundays, but i think the camaraderie, the bond, you share with your peers matters alot when game time rolls around.
Idgit;3738036 said:You can't equate Tim MacMahon's opinions with the opinions of the staff and players. It's not the same thing. And media access to a locker room is not the same access that players and coaches have. He's not in team meetings, he doesn't report with his opinions impressions from any players on the subject.
In any event, camaraderie and bonding might be nice, but when you win as many games as Tony Romo does, and play as well doing it, it's pretty clear that it's not the domino playing that matters on the field on Sunday. If it were, then somebody, anywhere, in any way related to the organization would be saying that Tony maybe shouldn't get his job back. Nobody is, because everybody who knows better knows Tony's got the best chance of leading this team where it needs to go.
RoyTheHammer;3737941 said:Not to start this up again, but this is a guy who's in the locker room and can see what's going on. Its just one guy's opinion and he could very well be mistaken, but just so some realize its more than just "one or two idiot fans" on the board here who have some concerns.
Just to clarify as well, he didn't say Romo had no camaraderie with his teammates, just that Romo is very "cliquish". He has a good relationship with a small group of players, however Kitna has a great camaraderie with pretty much all his teammates. He said he doesn't think there's "any question" that Kitna has a better relationship with the team than Romo.
He also said that people will say Aikman wasn't that type of friendly guy with all his teammates, but Aikman was "a butt kicker".
Romo is neither a guy who will be a "butt kicker" or a guy who has great camaraderie with his teammates either. That's what Tim says the problem with, that he is neither of those personality types.
He also said its hard to ask a guy to be something he's not, but as reserved as Tony is, and as withdrawn from his teammates as he is.. he doesn't seem like he can be a great leader.
This is coming from a guy who follows the team closely and is inside the locker room. Not saying he's right or wrong, but there are others who see what some of us "morons" on the board here see.
exactly, but he said also, that romo should be taking note, see how whole team responds to Kitna in bible study, dominoes, cards etc, and make connections with all of the players,
