ESPN Clayton: A glaring oversight overhead

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,278
Reaction score
45,637
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Cowboys Stadium's overhanging video scoreboard could provide safety, strategy issues

Comment Email Print Share
By John Clayton
ESPN.com

Dan in Duluth, Minn., sides with Jerry Jones on the Dallas Cowboys' scoreboard controversy.

He notes that Cowboys Stadium's high-definition screen is mounted 90 feet above the field -- five feet above the league specifications for an overhanging structure. Dan supports the idea that the Cowboys mounted the scoreboard with the full understanding that it complied with the approved limits, so it would be unfair of the NFL to ask Cowboys owner Jones to pay considerable money to fix it.

As it turns out, you are right, Dan, but give me a chance to expound on the issue. League commissioner Roger Goodell isn't going to force any change in the scoreboard in 2009. Last week the NFL ruled that the down will be replayed and clock will be reset if a football hits the overhanging video display board. The league can review the issue after the season.

While Jones did more than comply with the league standards, the 85-foot standard really doesn't make any sense. Every visiting punter who has been through there so far has hit the scoreboard, at least in warm-ups.

The overhanging scoreboard produces a safety problem because a replayed down further exposes players to potential injury: Another special-teams play means more high-speed collisions. It's a competitive advantage for the Cowboys because opposing punters who rely on high hang time might not be able to angle their kicks without hitting the scoreboard on certain spots on the field.

In my opinion, the reason the league requirement is 85 feet is that few people considered the potential problems created by punters. Though the Louisiana Superdome has an overhanging scoreboard, it is reportedly mounted much higher than the 90 feet in Jerry's stadium. The current group of punters might be the strongest in league history. Ninety feet is only 30 yards in altitude. It's only natural to think they can get 30 yards into the air on a punt to get the high hang time. It's pretty apparent Jones didn't include a punting consultant when he did environmental impact studies on the scoreboard.

In reality, the height should be somewhere between 100 and 110 feet, but determined after extensive testing by professional kickers.

As the story is told, Texas Stadium -- the Cowboys' old home -- was built with an opening in the middle of the roof so God could look down on his favorite team. The 90-foot gap between the new Cowboys Stadium field and the scoreboard is like a cloud that's blocking logic. If a punter can hit the scoreboard, Jones should move it.

What I'd like to see is a visiting quarterback hit the scoreboard with 30 seconds remaining and no timeouts and see if he can get a dead-ball ruling that is mandated for punts that hit the scoreboard. The quarterback can do this by rolling out of the pocket and firing the ball at the scoreboard. As long as he is outside the pocket and the ball is past the line of scrimmage, there can't be any intentional grounding calls.

In fact, would it not be out of line for a team with no timeouts to just throw to hit the scoreboard after each first down to reset the clock. If the scoreboard costs the Cowboys a chance to win a home game, you'll see how embarrassing the result will be.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/trainingcamp09/columns/story?columnist=clayton_john&id=4433919
 

HoosierCowboy

Put Pearson in the HOF
Messages
2,388
Reaction score
400
and penalties make punters rekick, exposing players to injury, so do away with them also

and make it a penalty to hit the scoreboard during warmups--no reason to do it except to show off
 

WarDaddy

kidcrook
Messages
1,480
Reaction score
1,015
He talks as if 90 feet is low. It just looks low because the screen is massive. It would be quite a challenge for a QB to just roll out of the pocket, under duress and just heave it straight up to hit the jumbotron. That is far easier said than done. I doubt many QB's could throw it that high without hurting themselves.
 

speedkilz88

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,949
Reaction score
23,097
idiocracyDVD-708981.jpg
 

Temo

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,946
Reaction score
362
Yes, John... in the waning moments of a close game, with he clock running down and few or no timeouts, QBs are going to be quick-hiking the ball, scrambling out of the pocket, and heaving the ball 30 yards into the air and at least 10 yards forward (which is equivalent to throwing a 70 yard pass or so, given the force of gravity) and hoping to hit a scoreboard. And hoping they don't miss the scoreboard and end up throwing up an interception or just losing the down anyway (with a few extra seconds spent scrambling and heaving a ball).

You're right, there's nothing wrong with this picture at all. It's not only possible, but it's going to happen. Absolutely.
 

adbutcher

K9NME
Messages
12,287
Reaction score
2,910
In other breaking news, Bike has designed new football helmets with facemasks.
 

Bull Frog

Well-Known Member
Messages
907
Reaction score
394
WoodysGirl;2915920 said:
What I'd like to see is a visiting quarterback hit the scoreboard with 30 seconds remaining and no timeouts and see if he can get a dead-ball ruling that is mandated for punts that hit the scoreboard. The quarterback can do this by rolling out of the pocket and firing the ball at the scoreboard. As long as he is outside the pocket and the ball is past the line of scrimmage, there can't be any intentional grounding calls.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/trainingcamp09/columns/story?columnist=clayton_john&id=4433919

Brilliant John. That is a much better option than spiking the ball. Simply brilliant.
 

JPM

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,301
Reaction score
1,236
adbutcher;2915956 said:
In other breaking news, Bike has designed new football helmets with facemasks.
and man lands on the moon.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
The NFL should fine media outlets that keep regurgitating the same stories about resolved issues.
 

Kangaroo

Active Member
Messages
9,893
Reaction score
1
:lmao2::lmao2::lmao2::lmao2:

Man this is the funniest year ever the writers have written more articles about the Dallas Cowboys screen than they have the entire NFL this Pre-Season

They are so desperate to throw Dallas name out to bolster their ratings that they write 500 articles on a scoreboard. :lmao2::lmao2::lmao2:

More proof just saying the name Dallas Cowboys makes ESPN more :money::money::money::money::money::money::money: than the rest of the NFL combine. Heck even the Brett Favre man love has taken a back seat to the screen.

Dallas Cowboy Scoreboard is more drama than >>>>> Brett Favre Drama
 

Temo

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,946
Reaction score
362
By the way, the scoreboard at the Louisana Superdome used be right at 90 feet, until Ray Guy hit it with a punt and they raised it all the way to ceiling (200+ feet).

Yea, so it took the greatest punter to ever play to hit that scoreboard at 90 feet. (And it was during the pro bowl, and Guy said he was trying to hit it, just to show off in a game that didn't matter).

Source: http://www.nytimes.com/1981/01/22/sports/guy-s-punts-a-big-weapon.html
 

tomson75

Brain Dead Shill
Messages
16,720
Reaction score
1
Bull Frog;2915958 said:
Brilliant John. That is a much better option than spiking the ball. Simply brilliant.

Theoretically (although assinine), it would be a better option.
 

Aikmaniac

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,126
Reaction score
1,217
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Pamela Anderson had plastic surgery??? When did this happen?
 

adbutcher

K9NME
Messages
12,287
Reaction score
2,910
nyc;2915977 said:
The year is no longer 1492. :laugh2:

:laugh2: It just feels like we are going back in time with all of the regurgitated garbage that is coming form :espn:
 

LeonDixson

Illegitimi non carborundum
Messages
12,299
Reaction score
6,808
WoodysGirl;2915920 said:
Cowboys Stadium's overhanging video scoreboard could provide safety, strategy issues

Comment Email Print Share
By John Clayton
ESPN.com



What I'd like to see is a visiting quarterback hit the scoreboard with 30 seconds remaining and no timeouts and see if he can get a dead-ball ruling that is mandated for punts that hit the scoreboard. The quarterback can do this by rolling out of the pocket and firing the ball at the scoreboard. As long as he is outside the pocket and the ball is past the line of scrimmage, there can't be any intentional grounding calls.

In fact, would it not be out of line for a team with no timeouts to just throw to hit the scoreboard after each first down to reset the clock. If the scoreboard costs the Cowboys a chance to win a home game, you'll see how embarrassing the result will be.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/trainingcamp09/columns/story?columnist=clayton_john&id=4433919
I'm sure you would LIKE TO SEE it, John. How else is your ranting going to be vindicated? You were punked. Deal with it you wuss.
 

Boyzmamacita

CowBabe Up!!!
Messages
29,047
Reaction score
64,100
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
John Clayton
What I'd like to see is a visiting quarterback hit the scoreboard with 30 seconds remaining and no timeouts and see if he can get a dead-ball ruling that is mandated for punts that hit the scoreboard. The quarterback can do this by rolling out of the pocket and firing the ball at the scoreboard. As long as he is outside the pocket and the ball is past the line of scrimmage, there can't be any intentional grounding calls.

What you'd like to see, Clayton? Why would you like to see it? So you can say I told you so, it's too low? So the opposing QB has to move out of the pocket, taking valuable seconds off the clock, then not only throw the ball up, but hit the videoboard, because if he doesn't, it's a live ball that can be picked off and returned for a pic six by Dallas. If that's the only way to make your point then you never had much of a point in the first place.

Here's what I'd like to see (actually I wouldn't): Romo doing the same thing in the Cowboys favor. Ever thought about that?
 
Top