Chocolate Lab;3209016 said:
Sorry, I left out the end somehow... Just put that back in.
Gotta love it. Roy wasn't motivated the right way, according to coach Werder.
And starting Marc Colombo could well cost us this game.
Werder just makes a bigger *** of himself with each passing day.
Well this only further proves that Wade is more involved in the team contrary to what a number of forum members have speculated and that Garrett having been hired first was not an undermining factor at all. I always felt it was that way because Wade took the job with his eyes wide open.
From what I have read and perceived Wade asserted himself more in his position because he knew that totally delegating to other coaches, particularly those learning on the job, wasn't going to get the job done. Wade had to be in on more meetings and not just allow the offense to operate totally autonomous.
Negative fan speculation was that Jones meddled and pressured Wade to fire Stewart, even Read, but that was Wade taking the initiative based on a number of reports you can read lately. The changes Wade talked about for 2009 included him getting more involved, and directly using his coaching talent and experience on defense.
Wade has made Garrett more accountable to him as well and inputing whom to put back in the line up when appropriate as in the case of Columbo. So in effect Wade is much more involved and demanding with his coaching style. And forecasting payoff for effort has really taken hold of this team.
I was critical myself in 2007 and 2008 of Wade Phillips because of the way we kept cratering late each of those seasons. But I read and realized the positive change that was taking place with the players during the regular season and I stopped criticizing and appreciating what Wade was starting to accomplish.
I didn't even state anything negative or jump off the bandwagon when we lost those first 2 games in December. Even if we lose this game and I believe we won't, I want Wade to be back next year because we did make progress and played well against some very good teams.
Fan nature is something else. Note that there is less criticism of Wade and particularly Jerry lately. It seemed every game we struggled or lost especially in December certain forum members took the initiative of hammering or mocking Phillips let alone Jones. Phillips is getting some praise now and stifling critics but why not Jerry Jones.
If Jerry can be skewered every time we lose then why can't he be positively acknowledged when we win. Not very equitable is it.