ESPN: David Mosse: What if the NFL had not adopted a system of free agency?

Cbz40

The Grand Poobah
Messages
31,387
Reaction score
39
What if the NFL had not adopted a system of free agency?

ESPN.com


The NFL staff has identified plays or events that may have altered the course of history. Each Tuesday and Saturday throughout the offseason, we will be tackling a different scenario and speculate on how things might have gone differently.

Perhaps no league features as much player movement as the NFL, but that wasn't always the case. For decades, players fought to achieve freedom. The breakthrough finally came, ironically enough, as a result of the failed strike in 1987, and the consequences have forever altered the landscape of the league.

a_taglibue_i.jpg

Paul Tagilabue was forced to finally give in to the demands of the players.





The NFL Players Association was formed in 1956, but struggled to gain the respect of the the league's owners and executives. Nevertheless, the threat of antitrust litigation helped the union win certain benefits through the years, including a pension, health insurance plan, and payment for exhibition games. It also eliminated the Rozelle Rule, which barred players from moving to another team after their contracts expired.


Despite two lengthy work stoppages (in 1982 and 1987), little progress was made in the area of free agency. In 1989, the union was formally decertified, converting into a professional association. In turn, union members brought a new antitrust action against the NFL challenging its free agency rules as an unlawful restraint of trade.


The players prevailed in a jury trail, and the verdict left the league with little choice but to agree on a formula that permitted free agency, in return for salary caps tied to a formula based on players' share of total league revenues. As rosters change every year and fewer players finish their careers with the team that drafted them, it is fair to wonder what the NFL would look like today without free agency?

-- David Mosse
 

Cbz40

The Grand Poobah
Messages
31,387
Reaction score
39
Should have won the 4th anyway.....if two super egos had not collided. ;)
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
It would look like it did in the 1980s. 4-6 real good or great teams; another 4-6 contenders; another 8-10 mediocre teams; and the rest in the toilet.
 

sago1

Active Member
Messages
7,791
Reaction score
0
Can anyone explain to me how some teams consistently play poorly so they end up with high draft picks year after year and yet seldom do anything. How many years have the Cards been picking among the top 10 and yet they are still in the toilet. Raiders haven't done anything since the scowler left for Tampa; they've been in the toilet every since. Same goes for Detroit. You'd think somebody within the organization (like the owner) would figure changes are necessary. Of course we gotta wait and see if Jerry Jones does anything stupid in this draft. I'm hoping he leaves a lot of it in Ireland's hands with some input by the coaching staff--don't know how well Phillips has done in the few years he's been a head coach but don't also know if he had much input.
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
sago1;1426259 said:
The Cowboys would have won their 4th SB in the 90s.
They did win their 4th in the 90's. The first 2 were in the 70's. The 3rd, 4th, and 5th were in the 90's.
 

THUMPER

Papa
Messages
9,522
Reaction score
61
Hostile;1426317 said:
They did win their 4th in the 90's. The first 2 were in the 70's. The 3rd, 4th, and 5th were in the 90's.

Damn kids. :bang2:
 

superpunk

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,330
Reaction score
75
THUMPER;1426330 said:
Damn kids. :bang2:

i say "damn prepositions."

replace "in" with "of" and it's an accurate statement. Who knew Hostile was the Hitler of prepositions?

:laugh1:
 

NextGenBoys

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,252
Reaction score
1,964
Hostile;1426317 said:
They did win their 4th in the 90's. The first 2 were in the 70's. The 3rd, 4th, and 5th were in the 90's.

I think he meant that we would have won our fourth SB in that decade alone. Could be wrong though.
 

Q_the_man

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,931
Reaction score
578
burmafrd;1426264 said:
It would look like it did in the 1980s. 4-6 real good or great teams; another 4-6 contenders; another 8-10 mediocre teams; and the rest in the toilet.

Ain't that how it looks now, 4-6 good teams (Chi, NE, Ind, Balt, SD)

4-6 contenders (Dall, Philly, NO, Jets, Cincy, Denver)

another 8-10 mediocre teams (Buf, Pit, KC, Jac, Buff, Rams, GB, panthers)

Well the rest.......To me it's the same thing............\

the only thing Free Agency has done is break up the cowboys in the 90's because the salary cap was so low, now as the salary cap again gets high we should be able to keep our next Dynasty together
 

Crown Royal

Insulin Beware
Messages
14,229
Reaction score
6,383
I guess it is because I am too young to remember, but I can't picture an NFL without free agency. In fact, I don't see how the NFL was able to keep it so long - it seems incredibly unfair to me.

Anyway - I'm prepared for a whoooole lot of good ole day syndrome in this thread.
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
FA is one part of it- the CAP is the other part. If there was no cap then most of the best talent would be on 4-6 teams with owners who have the money to buy the best talent.
the good ole days are just that because us older members know what GREAT teams look like.
 
Top