ESPN: Hank Steinbrenner says football has bigger steroid problem than baseball

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
InmanRoshi;1961335 said:
It already exists anyway. Sorry, if I'm someone like Sammy Sosa and I grew up in abject poverty in some shanty town in the Dominican and recruited at the age of 15 to start playing baseball and I start struggling my first few years in the big leagues ... If it comes down to taking steroids or flunking out of baseball, losing my work visa and going back to being poor in the DR with no education and no marketable skills other than playing baseball, I'm taking the needle. I don't care what the consequences are, nothing is worse than the alternative. The same could be said of any kind who grew up in some ghetto inner city in America.

As I said zero tolerance would deter if players knew they were banned from the sport for using steroids they would be less likely to do so. Right now a guy may miss a few games in baseball, so what a few games is worth the risk but being banned for life I think would wake some of these guys up. This game can be played clean and I do think many players do and should not be forced into a situation of using because some player choose to use
 

InmanRoshi

Zone Scribe
Messages
18,334
Reaction score
90
But here's the dirty little secret no one wants to admit ... fans would rather watch good players even if they are on steroids than watch a bunch of mediocre and horrible players play because all the good players have been kicked out of the league.

For all the steroid controversy and the fans feigning disgust, baseball attendance broke all records last year.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
InmanRoshi;1961362 said:
But here's the dirty little secret no one wants to admit ... fans would rather watch good players even if they are on steroids than watch a bunch of mediocre and horrible players play because all the good players have been kicked out of the league.

For all the steroid controversy and the fans feigning disgust, baseball attendance broke all records last year.

Sometime you do what is right instead of what is popular. As I said I do think many players play the game clean and should not be forced to choose between their careers and using steroids.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,581
Reaction score
27,861
InmanRoshi;1961302 said:
Why can't we just accept the fact that they're all doping, the genie is out of the bottle and just move on? You're never going to be able to stop them from doing it. Nobody has more stringent and demanding drug testing and enforcement than cycling, and guess what ... they're all still doping. And they're competing for just a fraction of the incentives in fame and money that professional football and baseball players are.

Its a little something called the integrity of the game. If they took to your idea then it would soon become a joke like the WWE.

Its cheating plain and simple and players already risk enough as it is and compelling them to risk more serious health issues just to compete is plain wrong.

I just remember seeing Lyle Alzado before he died and there is no question in my mind that this is something that needs to be inhibited if not stopped.

I am very much so a proponent of you do what you want to do with you and your body but this is not the case here. If they allow doping then it suddenly becomes a necessity to compete which in essence forces athletes to shoot up. When your habits begin effecting other peoples lives is where the line is drawn. This clearly does and as such should be banned.
 

Kangaroo

Active Member
Messages
9,893
Reaction score
1
tunahelper;1960804 said:
HGH can be detected through blood tests and not piss tests. Players union will not submit to blood testing.

I dont blame them either.

Would you want to be stuck with a needle at anytime and possibly several times a year?
Do not join the Military because you are government property and have no say in it blood test for drugs if they wanted well guess what you are giving it up with no say.


The best part was people in training use to get money taken away from them for damaging government property for getting a sun burn :lmao:.
 

InmanRoshi

Zone Scribe
Messages
18,334
Reaction score
90
FuzzyLumpkins;1961386 said:
Its a little something called the integrity of the game. If they took to your idea then it would soon become a joke like the WWE.

Its cheating plain and simple and players already risk enough as it is and compelling them to risk more serious health issues just to compete is plain wrong.

I just remember seeing Lyle Alzado before he died and there is no question in my mind that this is something that needs to be inhibited if not stopped.

The WWE is a joke for reasons that go way beyond steroids. If everyone of of their performers stopped taking steroids, they're still a joke. Let's not be so naive again to pretend there isn't rampant use already. HGH can't be tested for without baseline samples, and even then that's unreliable as people's testosterone levels naturally fluctuate. The users will always be one step ahead of the testers, and the war on steroids will be about as effective as the war on drugs. This is just a matter of human nature and economics, and in this case the rewards are too high. There is no such thing as a level playing field and fairness, in nurture or nature. Someone always has some sort of advantage over someone else, whether it's genetics or the environment they were raised.

Lots of people die of glioblastomas just like Alzado, including my 20 year old niece. I don't suspsect she was using steroids, unless she was using it to ehance her high school choir performances. This is great example of the problem with this isssue ... people knee jerk and make these completely baseless correleary associastions, and now the word "steroids" has become such a bugaboo word and hot topic issue that scientists are having trouble finding funding for research for the thearpeutic benefits that could benefit you and me.
 

Billy Bullocks

Active Member
Messages
4,098
Reaction score
22
As far as I know there is no blood test for HGH. And as far as I know none of the players unions are agreeing to allow blood testing.

I mean, I know their was steroid use in the NFL in the 1980's...but anyone who thinks guys are getting to where they are at without some HGH or whatever are totally kidding themselves.

The NFL has as big a problem as any league I think.

The biggest difference that I see:

In the NFL you don't have guys breaking Historic records season after season after season. I mean you got Emmitt breaking the rushing record, but that was more longevity than anything else. Tomlinson breaking the TD record. Brady throwing loads of TDs.

There were always guys who dominated the game in the NFL during their respective careers, but it hasn't reached a point where all of a sudden the most heralded records in the sport are being broken.

The playing field is just as even, wheras in baseball I think you saw alot more guys who achieved super human status because of steroids.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,581
Reaction score
27,861
InmanRoshi;1961417 said:
The WWE is a joke for reasons that go way beyond steroids. If everyone of of their performers stopped taking steroids, they're still a joke. Let's not be so naive again to pretend there isn't rampant use already. HGH can't be tested for without baseline samples, and even then that's unreliable as people's testosterone levels naturally fluctuate. The users will always be one step ahead of the testers, and the war on steroids will be about as effective as the war on drugs. This is just a matter of human nature and economics, and in this case the rewards are too high. There is no such thing as a level playing field and fairness, in nurture or nature. Someone always has some sort of advantage over someone else, whether it's genetics or the environment they were raised.

Lots of people die of glioblastomas just like Alzado, including my 20 year old niece. I don't suspsect she was using steroids, unless she was using it to ehance her high school choir performances. This is great example of the problem with this isssue ... people knee jerk and make these completely baseless correleary associastions, and now the word "steroids" has become such a bugaboo word and hot topic issue that scientists are having trouble finding funding for research for the thearpeutic benefits that could benefit you and me.

Again when your habits begin to effect other peoples lives then it is something that needs to be curtailed. I am not some reactionary and my views on drug policy are akin to yours but this is different. If you want to hang out iin your backyard in a dumpster with several hookers and a bottle of draino, I do not care.

In this case, if steroids are given a free pass you are creating an environment where it is literally necessary to juice to compete. It at that point isnt in someones elses backyard anymore.

Lyle Alzado stated that his rampant steroid use in the 70s was key in his development of cancer. When you systematically speed the regrowth of tissue then you are going to increase the risks of cancer. They also wreak havoc on the renal system. That is not an ancillary correlation from anyone but the man himself.

Really though with your mindset you can justify just about anything. You cannot stop people from murdering other people its been going on for years and it will continue to go for years so we might as well just allow it, right? That is so obviously not a justification.

Oh and your fearmongering about the word is a bald faced lie. There are extensive testing involving steroids ranging from lupus and its kin to liung and other organ therapies. I know of these becaue of a condition that my mother has and there is no issue getting funding.
 

InmanRoshi

Zone Scribe
Messages
18,334
Reaction score
90
FuzzyLumpkins;1961492 said:
Lyle Alzado stated that his rampant steroid use in the 70s was key in his development of cancer. When you systematically speed the regrowth of tissue then you are going to increase the risks of cancer. They also wreak havoc on the renal system. That is not an ancillary correlation from anyone but the man himself.

Lyle Alzado was not a doctor or researcher of any kind and was simply trying to make sense of the fact that he was a tragic statistical anamoly. My niece believed that cellphones caused hers. If steroids caused glioblastoma, there would be former players dropping dead left and right. Just like if cellphones actually caused glioblastomas there would be teenagers dropping dead left and right. It's not happening. The baseless correlation has no basis in any type of scientific fact and is used by fear mongers.
 

joseephuss

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,041
Reaction score
6,920
InmanRoshi;1961510 said:
Lyle Alzado was not a doctor or researcher of any kind and was simply trying to make sense of the fact that he was a statistical anamoly. My niece thought that cellphones caused hers. If steroids caused glioblastoma, there would be former players dropping dead of glioblastoma left and right. It's not happening. The correlation is used by fear mongers.

Steroids don't necessarily need to be considered dangerous. They are used quite a bit to help people, but there is still a lot we don't know about them when they are over used or abused. I don't think it is unreasonable to say that steroid use for athletes borders on steroid abuse. Those aren't normal doses these guys are taking. That may change the dynamic on how it affects a person's long term health, but how are we supposed to truly know. Steroids were not developed for that type of use. Are there extensive scientific studies on this type of use?
 

jimmy40

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,866
Reaction score
1,888
Big Dakota;1960705 said:
Well there are what, about 1900 nfl players including PS players? That would be about 6 tests per player per year. I'd say old Hank doesn't know what the hell he's talking about.
So the NFL fixes games but can't fix tests? I'm not saying your one of the "the NFL is fixed" idiots but you can see where I'm going here.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,581
Reaction score
27,861
InmanRoshi;1961510 said:
Lyle Alzado was not a doctor or researcher of any kind and was simply trying to make sense of the fact that he was a tragic statistical anamoly. My niece believed that cellphones caused hers. If steroids caused glioblastoma, there would be former players dropping dead left and right. Just like if cellphones actually caused glioblastomas there would be teenagers dropping dead left and right. It's not happening. The baseless correlation has no basis in any type of scientific fact and is used by fear mongers.

Lyle Alzado wasnt an idiot and he also had some of the best medical help he could get at the time. Its not as if he wasnt in a position to make a informed decision. Youre crusade to try and paint anabolics as benign is pretty sad

I will repeat myself. Anything that accelerates cell growth tends towards cancer. There is no if ands or buts about it.

What do you think anabolic steroids do?
 

mmillman

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,153
Reaction score
35
Big Dakota;1960705 said:
Well there are what, about 1900 nfl players including PS players? That would be about 6 tests per player per year. I'd say old Hank doesn't know what the hell he's talking about.

I like the Sonny Six killer picture, but with all due respect you don't know what you are talking about.

Steroids are rampant in football. It is used in the NFL and has been since at least the early 70's. The vast majority of college guys use them. It is even becoming more and more prevalent in high school. Why? Because they work. If you want that college scholarship juice your indestructible. You want to make it into the pros juice you will get millions.

I know this because I have witnessed it first hand in football and track in college. It is naive to think that the premier sport for size, strength and speed is not using steroids. The NFL will tell you that they test but there are dozens of ways around those tests.
 

superonyx

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,480
Reaction score
15,841
FuzzyLumpkins;1961386 said:
Its a little something called the integrity of the game. If they took to your idea then it would soon become a joke like the WWE.

Its cheating plain and simple and players already risk enough as it is and compelling them to risk more serious health issues just to compete is plain wrong.

I just remember seeing Lyle Alzado before he died and there is no question in my mind that this is something that needs to be inhibited if not stopped.

I am very much so a proponent of you do what you want to do with you and your body but this is not the case here. If they allow doping then it suddenly becomes a necessity to compete which in essence forces athletes to shoot up. When your habits begin effecting other peoples lives is where the line is drawn. This clearly does and as such should be banned.

I really wanted to stay out of this debate. But the Lyle Alzado comments sucked me in. Please dont assume that Lyle dies due to steriods without some medical proof. The facts are the many media outlets tried to say his brain tumor was caused by steriods yet not a single medical organizations can tie steriod use to brain tumors. The facts actually show that testosterone and brain tumors have zero correlation. If they did dont you think Arnold and the early bodybuilders would have already started to die from tumors?
HGH can cause everything in your body to grow. Including a tumor. But the tumor has to already be their for this to happen. Steroids and HGH do not cause cells to mutate into cancer.
 

superonyx

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,480
Reaction score
15,841
FuzzyLumpkins;1961818 said:
Lyle Alzado wasnt an idiot and he also had some of the best medical help he could get at the time. Its not as if he wasnt in a position to make a informed decision. Youre crusade to try and paint anabolics as benign is pretty sad

I will repeat myself. Anything that accelerates cell growth tends towards cancer. There is no if ands or buts about it.

What do you think anabolic steroids do?

Please dont make the "no if ands or buts about it" comment on this topic.
So according to your comment accelerated cell growth causes cancer... hmm Shouldn't you look at the type of cell that the chemical has an effect on before you make this statement? So going with your "theory" being a man causes cancer? Since we have testosterone levels 600% over a womens. And being a black man is really a cause of cancer. Since they have a higher testosterone level than white or asian men. Now the goal isnt to make this about race. Just to point out the fact that anything that causes increased cell regrowth rates or reduced recovery time isnt tied to cancer. Especially when the chemical in question is shown not to have any effects on brain tumors. Now HGH is more dangerous if you have a hidden tumor. It can accelerate the growth of a tumor. However no medical researchers can show that HGH can CAUSE the tumor to form.

Please post us the info that says otherwise so we can go along with your "no if ands or buts" comment.
 

JPM

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,313
Reaction score
1,261
superonyx;1961994 said:
I really wanted to stay out of this debate. But the Lyle Alzado comments sucked me in. Please dont assume that Lyle dies due to steriods without some medical proof. The facts are the many media outlets tried to say his brain tumor was caused by steriods yet not a single medical organizations can tie steriod use to brain tumors. The facts actually show that testosterone and brain tumors have zero correlation. If they did dont you think Arnold and the early bodybuilders would have already started to die from tumors?
HGH can cause everything in your body to grow. Including a tumor. But the tumor has to already be their for this to happen. Steroids and HGH do not cause cells to mutate into cancer.
Great post. I have also heard that no long term studies have been done on the eefects of steroids.
 
Top