BraveHeartFan;3306814 said:Every time you post I become more and more thankful that the Cowboys have no one like you calling the shots or making the decisions.
We'd have the new Washington Commanders of offseason Championships with someone like you calling the shots.
Jon88;3306827 said:I don't understand why we want to bring someone back who we cut last year. What exactly has changed regarding he and us? He's the same player except a year older.
Why not bring back TO? It's the same thinking.
Four;3306831 said:no
nothing about TO and Ellis is similar other than both played for the team.
That comparison is fail.
Randy White;3306821 said:and it makes sense.
Bringing back Ellis is an insurance policy. Something happens to Ware, Spencer moves into his side, Ellis takes over against the run ( experience ) with Butler and Williams ( if he shows he can play ) taking over on passing downs. If Spencer goes down, Ellis goes back to his old position, again, with Butler and Williams helping him.
This would eliminate OLB as a position to address early, if at all, in the draft.
The conditions would be this: the majority of reps in practice go to Butler and Williams. The majority of reps during pre-season go to Butler and Williams. During the season, if there's no injuries, Ellis would come in sub either Ware or Spencer in order to rest them, on passing downs, particularly in the 4th quarter. However, he must share the reps during the begining of the game with Butler and Williams.
In other words, Ellis: you're going to be useful depth wise in case of an injury, and experience wise, late in games. I don't want to hear any complaints from you about PT during the season and/or early in games.
anava;3306773 said:Would hate this move...He had the attitude that I was glad we got rid of....
Jon88;3306834 said:It's the same rationale - bringing a player back because we think he'll be different.
Four;3306840 said:no, Ellis all but asked for his release.
He was drafted by us, had a career year one year before he was released.
He was not a locker room problem, even though fans keep trying to say it so much people will forget he was a team first guy.
There is nothing comparable.
He would be coming into a defined role instead of a redefined one, which is what being demoted is.
To you they are the same situation because you don't like either player and it blinds you to reality.
There is nothing about greg ellis that was ever like anything TO pulled here.
TO was a merc. Hired gun with no loyalties.
Why do you guys take a crap on greg so willingly? like he never did a thing, like he was TO? get out of here with that BS.
Four;3306840 said:Why do you guys take a crap on greg so willingly? like he never did a thing, like he was TO? get out of here with that BS.
SLATEmosphere;3306828 said:I'd have this team be perenial superbowl champs if I was runnin the show.
BraveHeartFan;3306881 said:LOL. Yeah just like Danny Boy Snyder has with all his "Spend! Spend! We've got to get the big name free agents! SPEND DAMN IT! SPEND!"
TheSport78;3306803 said:I understand what you're saying, DC, and I agree with most of it. I'm just going to play devil's advocate in favor of Ellis returning.
I'm pretty sure Greg Ellis is an upgrade over Steve Octavien, pass rushing wise for depth. The only difference is that Octavien plays special teams, but no pun intended, isn't anything that special.
Secondly, we all have high hopes for Brandon Williams and what he can bring to the table, but the fact is that he's coming back from an ACL tear. There's no guarantee he'll feel comfortable right away, so it may take a little time for him.
Thirdly, Ellis knows the system and knows his ROLE. We let the market come to him, and he found the Oakland Raiders.
Lastly, no one has ever questioned Ellis' leadership abilities. All of his problems were between him and the office.
It's a safe and wise signing, assuming he's healthy of course. Thoughts?