ESPN KC Joyner 8/23 Chat Wrap... 4 'boys

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,281
Reaction score
45,652
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Good afternoon!

Craig (Boston): How do you see Ferguson impacting the Vikings passing game?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: I don't mean to be negative about this, but the way Ferguson has played the past couple of seasons, he should fit right in with the Minnesota wideouts.


Zach(San Diego): Metrically, who was better last season, reggie Brown or Kevin Curtis? How do you see their season's playing out?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Zach, Brown had the better overall YPA but Curtis had better vertical numbers. That's why I think Curtis will be used deep and Brown on more short/medium routes.


Greg (Denver, CO): If Oakland's starting OL plays well again tomorrow, is there reason to believe that this team could surprise a few teams this year and the was maligned more due to coaching/system than actual talent?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Greg, if the Raiders O line is improved, and the word I'm hearing around the league is that it is improving on a regular basis, Oakland is an 8-8 candidate this year. They have the players, of that there is little doubt.


Don Buffalo: What type of metrics if any at all do you have on Buffalo CB Jabari Greer. He always seems to play great in TC and Pre-Season but always flops during the year. Since there is some uncertainly at the CB position do you think Greer could push for a starting spot?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Greer metrics over the years have been around nickel CB level. He's definitely good enough to warrant a roster spot but he's probably not good enough to be a starter. Having said that, I'd still take him over Jason Webster seven days a week.


Timothy (Columbus, OH): KC, I love your stuff, but I have to dispute one of your stats. Charlie Frye had more than 3 int's as a result of dropped passes. Edwards had one in wk 1 agianst the Saints, Droughns has 1 in week 2 against Cin, Northcutt had one against Oak in wk 4, and Edwards had another one in the middle of the season. Considering how awful the recievers played last year there may have been more.

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Timothy, one of the difficulties in tracking that type of metric is that it has a certain level of subjectivity built in. Where I might see a interception coming due primarily to an inaccurate pass that bounced of a WRs hands, you might see a drop. It's not that either of us is necessarily wrong, it's just that we would disagree on the cause of the pick.


Tim (nyc): what do your metrics say about DeAngelo Williams? is he set up to have a good season?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: I believe Williams could have a strong season because of the Panthers schedule. They face a number of weak run defenses in 2007, and that always bodes well for a RB.


Boston Bob: KC, SF:2007 is a great book! I'm glad you returned to the SF:2005 format. Much easier to digest. Please don't change it! You were right on the money with Tory James. He allowed 2 TDs against Tennessee last week: beaten for a pass and whiff on a running play. He's horrible. I think you're being harsh with Rodney Harrison, however. IIRC, he was pushed into Trent Green's knee on that play.

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Thanks for the good words about the book, Bob. I tried to be as fair with Harrison as I could.


Xander (Philly): Lotta work to do today KC, just wanted to drop by and say whats up...NE seems to be having some WR issues already. How long till Moss blows up at Brady or BB?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Good to see you, Xander. I'm chalking the preseason issues up to players being antsy for the season to start. Let's not get too worried just yet!


Sean (Philly): Does it pay off to select a TE like Gates if all that is available are second tier number 1 WR's? The first WR I took was Braylon in the 7th round.

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Sean, I usually advocate getting at least one elite player on a fantasy roster. If you were down to the Braylon Edwards value level at WR, Gates was probably a good pick.


Ajit, Saratoga CA: KC, In SF 2007 you said New England didn't have the depth to go 12 rounds with Indy. I am curious, are you saying that the loss was because their linebackers had poor depth or was it their defense in general?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Ajit, the depth issue mostly showed up at LB, but don't forget that NE also had Harrison out of the lineup.


Paul (Trenton, NJ): Was that a mirage last week or did Daunte Culpepper look pretty mobile out there whether rolling out or scrambling? If he's got that back, what's his upside?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Paul, the word I'm hearing is that Culpepper is doing fairly well. I'm not quite ready to say he'll be the comeback player of the year but that thought is starting to come across my radar screen.


Matt(Logan, UT): What's up with the denver defense so far. They were supposed to be awesome, but they have stunk it up so far. Any chance they sign Trotter, they are looking for someody to fill Warrick Holdmans spot.

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Matt, the Broncos offense put the defense in some bad spots against Dallas, so I wouldn't entirely blame that on their defense. They could use some LB depth, especially a run stuffer like Trotter given how the Denver D line is getting banged up.


Ryan (Tampa): With Plaxico coming off an ankle sprain and Shocky an overall injury risk, does Toomer have any Fantasy value this year as a solid #2 WR?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Ryan, Toomer could be what I call an insurance policy player for ppr leagues. He's the kind of guy that will put up 8-10 points just about every week in a ppr league. Those points aren't enough to win you games, but at least you will know you aren't going to get a goose egg.


John (Cincinnati): KC, How do you think the Brown's secondary can perform this year?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: John, if the Browns secondary stays healthy, they have a chance at being one of the best in the NFL. Bodden is on the verge of being an elite CB and Sean Jones is a playmaker.


Pat (Fort Morgan, CO): Your metrics are like my Bible. Everyone at ESPN seems to believe Alex Smith is a game manager type of quarterback. I want more than a game manager. Will he be a star?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Pat, with the additions at WR, Smith should progress very nicely this year. I'm not quite ready to say he will be a star, but he could close in on the top 10.


Mike (Annapolis): KC - how about answering a question about the one major trade (involving starters) that went down today? Is Pete Kendall a good fit for the Commanders?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: I've had a ton of Pete Kendall questions, so I guess I'd better weigh in on him. My take on Kendall is that he won't need to be a world beater to do well with Washington. The Skins have one of the best O lines in the NFL, especially from a run blocking standpoint, so Kendall will simply need to fit in. He's more than capable of that if he stays healthy.


Shawn Tn : Kc, Are you one of the people who hate Dallas questions?... :)

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Shawn, far from it! Dallas is a very interesting team to talk about, but I simply haven't had many Cowboys questions posted so far.



Bob(Pittsburgh): Any concerns about the Steelers offense so far this preseason?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Not really. I didn't expect the Steelers to explode out of the gate in this offense. Arians has a different approach to offense from Whisenhunt and it will take the Steelers a few games to get into a groove in this system.


Mr. Christopher (Buffalo): Judging from your comments regarding the Skins O-line, it seems those criticizing the Bills for signing D. Dockery are off base.

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Mr. Christopher, I'm of the mindset that the Buffalo personnel department did a pretty good job in dealing with all of their personnel issues this offseason.


Shawn TN : KC, well here is one for you... After reading the 07 Predictions on ESPN.com yesterday I was suprised noone picked Dallas to make it to the NFC champ game. I do not see any glaring weaknesses that would prevent them from running with anyone in the NFC.. So why no love for the Boys? Any Ideas?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Shawn, I completely agree that Dallas has the talent to make an NFC Championship game level run. They do have potential issues at safety but their defense should be strong enough to work around that. I think the reasons Dallas isn't seen as the NFC favorite are a) the media's lack of faith in Wade Phillips as a head coach and b) their lack of faith in Tony Romo as a QB.



Travis (Canada): KC, give me some good news on Saints TE Eric Johnson and that offence finally coming together before the season starts? Whst numbers shall we expect from the main players there?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Travis, I have been surprised at how bad the Saints have looked on offense this preseason. As far as Johnson goes, all of the metrics on him say that he should be a very good possession TE if he can stay healthy. NO could use that type of a guy to take the pressure off of Colston, so Johnson looks to be a good addition.


RYAN (TEXAS): "HAIL TO THE Commanders......HAIL VICTORY....BRAVES ON THE WARPATH......FIGHT!.....FOR 'OL D.C."!!!!.......YOU THINK THERE'S A CHANCE WE CAN HEAR THAT SONG PLAYED AT THE SUPER BOWL IN '08??

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Only if you bring a portable soundsystem and play it in the parking lot before the game, Ryan!


RYAN (TEXAS): Commanders

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: And I meant that in a good way, Ryan!


Chuck (Rochester, NY): How does Ronnie Brown look in Miami this year and what kind of number can we expect from him in their new Offense?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Chuck, it's all going to depend on the O line. Miami moved around every O lineman to new positions, and it could take a few games for them to gel. If they stay healthy, and if Green/Lemon can provide solid QB play, Brown could have a good year. That's a lot of ifs, though.


Tom (SD): I made a trade yesterday and added Brees and Braylon Edwards in exchange for Palmer and Devery Henderson, who get the better end of the deal?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: I see Brees and Palmer as being pretty much equal. From a fantasy standpoint, Edwards is the better player, so I'd say you got the better deal.


Ryan: (Nampa, ID): Hey KC - What do you think about the addition of Gerrard Warren to the Raiders line? Can he improve an already good pass rush?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Warren is really being seen as a depth guy. If he plays up to his potential, he'll give Oakland a good backup.


Ajit, Saratoga CA: KC, is it just me or does denver seem to do well against the patriots and just get shreded by Indy? Do you think its a matchup reason or is Indy just in Denver's head? And are you doing any radio shows today?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Ajit, Denver hasn't done well against Indy in large part because it's hard to beat the Colts with a 4-3 defense.


Ed (Baltimore): You say the cowboys can make a run at the super bowl? What do they have the 'Skins dont?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: A much better group of WRs for one. A D line that can generate a pass rush. And a better overall secondary. I like a lot things about the Skins but they simply aren't as deep in talent as Dallas or Philly.



Greg (Norman, Ok): Ummm... Drew Brees has a total of two incompletions in the past two games, and the starters have racked up a nice amount of yardage in those games. So, why do you think the Saints offense has looked bad?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Greg, it could be that I don't think they have looked as good as they did late last year. Heck, it could be simply that they are rolling out simple game plans. It's one of the reasons I hate trying to grade preseason games.


Rob (Ashburn): Dallas has a better overall secondary than Washington? That can't be right.

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Rob, don't forget that Washington does have Carlos Rogers in their secondary. On the plus side, if LaRon Landry does play well, I'd grade their secondaries a push.



pat (st. louis): KC, which team will emerge from NFC West division. I'm biased... think the Rams will suprise everyone.

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Pat, if the Rams are going to win the division, they are going to have to do it with a ton of shootouts. I just don't trust the St. Louis defense to slow down any offense.


Mikey(Lackawanna,NY): KC, Do you think the A-Train and Marshawn Lynch will be a good 1-2 punch this season for the Buffalo Bills? Do you think they will use Marshawn at WR? Also who do you think they will use more?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Mikey, I do think that the Bills have a very good 1-2 punch in those two. I'd bet Lynch gets more carries. The big concern is that Buffalo faces a ton of tough run defenses: Pittsburgh, New England twice, Dallas, Baltimore, Miami twice and Jacksonville. Lynch could play well and still not have a great stat year because of the matchups.


Troy (Toronto): Hey KC, I just ordered your FF 2007 book (electronic), but have no idea where to go to download it.....sorry first time. Can you help point me in the right direction? Thanks

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Troy, shoot me an email at kc@thefootballscientist.com and I'll walk you through it.


Adam (Columbus OH): Think the NFC East can sneak three teams into the playoffs again? If so who's on the outside looking in?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: That's a tough call, Adam. I'd say Washington could be on the outside if Campbell progresses and the WRs step up.


Joe (Indianapolis, IN): Would you draft a Titans RB in your draft? I don't like White or Henry but they are always available in late rounds...

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Joe, carries are the coin of the realm in fantasy football, so a Tennessee back getting the rock is a good backup option.


Kevin (Malvern): What do your metrics predict for Bulger & Holt this season- Up or down form last year?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Kevin, Holt was banged up last year and that's a big part of the reason he struggled in the metrics. A healthy Holt will improve both his and Bulger's numbers.


Travis (Canada): KC and Greg, I guess my concerns is that the back-up Q.B, W.R, and runners have looked like they were signed off the street and not in the system for two years. I meant Jamie Martin, Terrence Cooper and Aaron Stecker, just look at the second half of the Cincy game last week to see what I mean and they should have beaten Buffalo as well!

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: I agree with you Travis. The Saints backups seemed to completely fall apart. NO may be a team that has to stay healthy to be an elite team.


Greensboro, NC: "I'd say Washington could be on the outside if Campbell progresses and the WRs step up." That doesn't make sence. Can you clear that up...

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: The question was which team would be on the outside of the playoffs in the NFC East. I meant that to say that Washington has a good chance to beat out the Giants if Campbell and WRs do well. They won't be quite good enough to get into the tourney, though.


Ben ( Chicago ): You would take T.O., old and injured Glenn, Crayton and whatever #4 receiver for Dallas over Moss, Randle El, Lloyd, and Thrash or another Skins #4 receiver?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Ben, you are kidding, right? Lloyd had awful metrics last year and Randle El's metrics were even worse. Glenn had great metrics and Owens is still just about as good as he ever was. It's no contest at the WR position between Dallas and Washington.



MichaelT29 (Chicago, IL): Hey KC, how do you see former and oft injured second round pick Mark Bradley returning with the Bears? Is he teh 3rd receiever needed to help Rex and lead our City to Super Bowl?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Bradley has performed well when he has been healthy in the past, so that bodes well. Having a combination of Bradley and Rashied Davis at #3 should give Chicago one of the better #3 WR positions in the NFL.


ryan(CT): How do you think Carson Palmer will do this year, 2 years away from the injury?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: I've got Palmer 3rd on my cheat sheet for QBs, if that gives you any indication.


Johnny(Queens): KC, Dont you think with the addition of Pete Kendall now the Redskind O-line look really good especially on paper? They have Chris Samuels, Pete Kendall, Randy Thomas, Jon Jansen, Jason Fabini ETC..?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Johnny, I would have said the Skins had one of the best O lines in the NFL before Kendall was added. If Washington is going to win a lot of games this year, it will have to be on the strength of their O line.


Chris, Florida: KC, interested to see if your metrics validate the Eagles decision to release Trotter. I'm definately going to miss the guy but it seemed to me that the Eagles D played a little better with Gaither in the middle.

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Chris, Gaither is also much younger, and that's the main reason Philly let go of Trotter. You hit the age of 30 and the Eagles start getting visions of your replacement in their heads.


al (DC): DC-native but not a Skins fan, their fans in their tunnel vision of the NFL are like Yankees and Sox fan -- Brandon Lloyd is horrible and so is Rnadle El...I have a more philosophic Q for you KC. The balance of power shifts in the NFL from year to year, does that make (in fantasy terms) focusing on the match-ups a little riskier?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Al, when it comes to grading fantasy players based on matchups, it really boils down to if the teams are going to target the matchups. Some teams don't necessarily target the matchups but more than enough do to give the matchup based system a good track record.


J (Milwaukee): Lee Evans vs. Champ Bailey! How does Champ do on deep passes? And can Evans beat him deep in week 1?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: J, I wonder if Denver will move Bailey over to cover Evans or leave Bly on him instead. It will be an interesting to see how they approach that, because Bly is scheduled to face Evans.


Mikey(Lackawanna,NY): Do you think RB Clinton Portis would be a good fantasy football pickup with his solid O-Line?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Mikey, I like Portis in that the Skins O line is that good (it seems like every question today is a Washington one). Having said that, Portis is starting to show signs of wear, so I would be careful not to overvalue him. Well, I hate to cut it short this early but I've got to hit the road. I hope to see everyone next week!
 

Chocolate Lab

Run-loving Dino
Messages
37,116
Reaction score
11,472
Rob (Ashburn): Dallas has a better overall secondary than Washington? That can't be right.

KC Joyner: Rob, don't forget that Washington does have Carlos Rogers in their secondary.
:laugh2: Ouch.
 

CoCo

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,603
Reaction score
187
WoodysGirl;1603373 said:
Ed (Baltimore): You say the cowboys can make a run at the super bowl? What do they have the 'Skins dont?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: A much better group of WRs for one. A D line that can generate a pass rush. And a better overall secondary. I like a lot things about the Skins but they simply aren't as deep in talent as Dallas or Philly.


*********************************************************

Ben ( Chicago ): You would take T.O., old and injured Glenn, Crayton and whatever #4 receiver for Dallas over Moss, Randle El, Lloyd, and Thrash or another Skins #4 receiver?

sn2.gif
KC Joyner: Ben, you are kidding, right? Lloyd had awful metrics last year and Randle El's metrics were even worse. Glenn had great metrics and Owens is still just about as good as he ever was. It's no contest at the WR position between Dallas and Washington.

Dear Ed: Ouch!

Dear Ben: What planet are your from???:laugh2:
 

CoCo

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,603
Reaction score
187
Actually when finding differences between Dallas and Washington I would start at QB.

If people consider Romo to be unproven what do they consider Campbell?
 

TunaFan33

Benched
Messages
1,824
Reaction score
0
CoCo;1603387 said:
Actually when finding differences between Dallas and Washington I would start at QB.

If people consider Romo to be unproven what do they consider Campbell?

True-but I think the point being that Romo's play down the stretch last year left some big question marks. He went from being the toast of the town to being TOAST.

Romo's looked sharp this preseason though.
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
I got Joyner's 2007 book in the mail the other day, and I was disappointed. There's not nearly as much as in the first two, there are stats missing, some stuff isn't explained well, and a lot of the chart space is wasted on his various classifications for interceptions/bad decisions/near interceptions/missed passes, etc. He's lucky his first one wasn't like this, or I probably wouldn't have bought the past two.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
AdamJT13;1603397 said:
I got Joyner's 2007 book in the mail the other day, and I was disappointed. There's not nearly as much as in the first two, there are stats missing, some stuff isn't explained well, and a lot of the chart space is wasted on his various classifications for interceptions/bad decisions/near interceptions/missed passes, etc. He's lucky his first one wasn't like this, or I probably wouldn't have bought the past two.
Indeed. The missing stats pissed me off. He did add some new stats that are interesting, but not having basic things such as completion percentages and TDs given up for CBs is ridiculous.
 

firehawk350

Active Member
Messages
2,108
Reaction score
0
Lots of Skins questions. I can't believe they acted outraged that the Cowboys were picked above the Skins, a 9-7 team will always get picked before a 5-11 team. That's just the way it is...

Having said that though, I think either can go the distance, there's just too much talent there to not be able to. But both have key players that must stay healthy to get there... Dallas: Newman, Fergy, Ware, Romo, Witten... Wash: Campbell, Moss, Cooley, Fletcher, Griffin. Just my 2 cents.
 

CoCo

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,603
Reaction score
187
I'm not one who is highly susceptible to homerism and I agree wholeheartedly with Joyner's assessment of our chances to make the NFC Title game.

On the media naysayers, I understand the reluctance to jump on Wade as head coach bandwagon. I think many if not most have those doubts. But the list of SB Head Coach bus drivers is a pretty long one IMO.

Wade's DC expertise should help the defense get where it needs to be, the offense is already in pretty good shape and hopefully enhanced by Bigg's presence. If both those units get rolling a mediocre head coach may be all that's needed in a given year to finish the job.

I can even understand the hesitation on Romo given his short tenure. But I firmly believe he's going to be more than adequate for us.

I think this should be a very good year. 11-5 and at least 1 PO win is my mostly conservative prediction.
 

5Stars

Here comes the Sun...
Messages
37,847
Reaction score
16,869
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
firehawk350;1603404 said:
Lots of Skins questions. I can't believe they acted outraged that the Cowboys were picked above the Skins, a 9-7 team will always get picked before a 5-11 team. That's just the way it is...

Having said that though, I think either can go the distance, there's just too much talent there to not be able to. But both have key players that must stay healthy to get there... Dallas: Newman, Fergy, Ware, Romo, Witten... Wash: Campbell, Moss, Cooley, Fletcher, Griffin. Just my 2 cents.


True, firehawk, but, just remember who has the most YOUNG depth, and by young, I don't mean a rookie. The Cowboys are solid with depth that can carry the team for even a month or so! Your team does not have that because your team doesn't draft...
 

tomson75

Brain Dead Shill
Messages
16,720
Reaction score
1
CoCo;1603405 said:
On the media naysayers, I understand the reluctance to jump on Wade as head coach bandwagon.

I understand it as well, my only contention is the lack of consistency within that train of thought. Many of the same media "experts" that think Wade will fail are predicting Norv Turner to be an instant success. Now, I know many of them may be basing this on the teams that each is inheriting (although I think theirs has already hit its ceiling), but how does that reflect on whether the coach himself is responsible? Wouldn't it then be the player's responsibility? eh...

I think many if not most have those doubts. But the list of SB Head Coach bus drivers is a pretty long one IMO.

I wouldn't call Phillips a "bus driver".
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
Have to laugh at the "Commanders O line was great even before Kendall"
When KC makes a mistake its a big one.
 

firehawk350

Active Member
Messages
2,108
Reaction score
0
CoCo;1603387 said:
Actually when finding differences between Dallas and Washington I would start at QB.

If people consider Romo to be unproven what do they consider Campbell?
Well I think the reason people have faith in Campbell is he is more of a prototypical franchise QB. Great arm, big and tall, drafted early, puts in lots of film room time and can run too.

Nobody expected Romo to perform like that, and when he did, everyone was all over it because it seemed like another Kurt Warner type story. Then he slumped so everyone who was pimping him was left scratching their collective heads, and kinda backtracking... So now, having already proclaimed him the next best thing and being burnt (at least that's the perception), I don't think they want to jump the gun so quickly in reference to him.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
firehawk350;1603416 said:
Well I think the reason people have faith in Campbell is he is more of a prototypical franchise QB. Great arm, big and tall, drafted early, puts in lots of film room time and can run too.

Nobody expected Romo to perform like that, and when he did, everyone was all over it because it seemed like another Kurt Warner type story. Then he slumped so everyone who was pimping him was left scratching their collective heads, and kinda backtracking... So now, having already proclaimed him the next best thing and being burnt (at least that's the perception), I don't think they want to jump the gun so quickly in reference to him.
Anyone that saw the guy perform in preseason or heard Parcells talk about him expected him to do well. I think being able to put up a 95 QB rating in the NFL makes him more of a "prototypical franchise QB" at this point than Campbell.
 

Bizwah

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,159
Reaction score
3,878
firehawk350;1603416 said:
Well I think the reason people have faith in Campbell is he is more of a prototypical franchise QB. Great arm, big and tall, drafted early, puts in lots of film room time and can run too.

Nobody expected Romo to perform like that, and when he did, everyone was all over it because it seemed like another Kurt Warner type story. Then he slumped so everyone who was pimping him was left scratching their collective heads, and kinda backtracking... So now, having already proclaimed him the next best thing and being burnt (at least that's the perception), I don't think they want to jump the gun so quickly in reference to him.

You do realize that his "slump" in the last five games looked like this:
257 yards
249 yards
278 yards
142 yards
321 yards

Now he did throw 8 INTs with only 6 TDs, so he did struggle with ball protection. But during his "slump" he was still moving the ball well. His main problem was trying to "force" the action.
 

firehawk350

Active Member
Messages
2,108
Reaction score
0
5Stars;1603408 said:
True, firehawk, but, just remember who has the most YOUNG depth, and by young, I don't mean a rookie. The Cowboys are solid with depth that can carry the team for even a month or so! Your team does not have that because your team doesn't draft...

Regardless, there are 5 or 6 players, that if out for more then 3 or 4 games, their respective teams will do horribly. Every club has them IMO. How far will the Pats go without Brady, or Indy without Manning? The Bears without Urlacher or the Bengals without Palmer/Johnson?

So in that vein, a decent chunk of success comes from luck or the toughness of a club's elite players. Sure, Manning has been tough to not ever miss a game, I'm sure he's more then felt sore a couple of occasions, but some injuries have nothing to do with the toughness of the player. Manning has been extrordinarily lucky to not have somebody fall on his leg wrong or something like that.

IMO, the cowboys can suffer a serious injury to the starters at WR, LB, RB and DE without missing too much. Either the back-ups are good, or the starters aren't that much better then the depth (RB and DE).
 

firehawk350

Active Member
Messages
2,108
Reaction score
0
Bizwah;1603424 said:
You do realize that his "slump" in the last five games looked like this:
257 yards
249 yards
278 yards
142 yards
321 yards

Now he did throw 8 INTs with only 6 TDs, so he did struggle with ball protection. But during his "slump" he was still moving the ball well. His main problem was trying to "force" the action.
Hey dude, I'm not proclaiming or declaiming the merits of calling it a slump, but that's the perceived reality of the situation. The collective media were saying how great Romo was, then he appeared to go on a slump, and everyone was kinda left looking stupid. So they'll be slightly more gunshy to say he can lead the Boys to the big dance this time. That's all I'm saying.
 

firehawk350

Active Member
Messages
2,108
Reaction score
0
theogt;1603418 said:
Anyone that saw the guy perform in preseason or heard Parcells talk about him expected him to do well. I think being able to put up a 95 QB rating in the NFL makes him more of a "prototypical franchise QB" at this point than Campbell.
The problem with this statement is your assuming that the national media does their research. Campbell has all the physical tools and seemingly, the intangibles and the college history of success at a big school and that's why he is a prototypical franchise QB. The media looks at it, and says, hey, that's normal for a young QB and we've seen this road walked a lot, and he has all the advantages in the world, so he'll do great.

Romo is far too unknown to make anybody comfortable. Sure, he put up a big QB rating, but he also coughed up the ball 15 times to his 6 TDs those last couple of games. So, not having much of an opinion on him before this season, they'll naturally be slightly more gunshy as he doesn't have the physical tools and draft reports that Campbell does.
 
Top