ESPN: Lance Briggs wants to be traded

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,278
Reaction score
45,637
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Briggs to Bears: Rescind the tag or trade me

By Len Pasquarelli
ESPN.com

Under the right circumstances, two-time Pro Bowl linebacker Lance Briggs could play his entire career with the Chicago Bears, and be a happy man.

Under the restrictive terms of the franchise designation with which the Bears have marked him, though, and with the defending NFC champions apparently offering him nothing more than the one-year option it entails, Briggs said Sunday evening that he doesn't want to play another day for the club that brought him into the league in 2003.

"There's a difference between the Chicago Bears team and the Chicago Bears organization," Briggs told ESPN.com, when reached Sunday evening at his home in suburban Chicago. "The Chicago Bears team? The coaches, players, city and fans? Yeah, I could stay there forever. I love it. But the Chicago Bears organization? I don't want to be there anymore. I won't play for them and I'll do everything in my power to keep from playing there."

In a 30-minute conversation by phone, Briggs -- distressed by the restrictions of the NFL franchise tag, by his inability to shop himself in the free agent market, and by the recent departure of defensive coordinator Ron Rivera -- offered his first insights into his current situation.

And he offered, Briggs said, what is the only truly viable solution to an untenable circumstance.

"They need to either [rescind] the franchise tag, and let me move on, or trade me to another team," Briggs said. "Because that's about the only way this thing can have any kind of a positive resolution."

Having failed last spring to consummate a long-term contract with Briggs -- reportedly a six-year, $33 million deal on which both sides worked for several weeks before the negotiations collapsed -- the Bears employed the franchise tag last week to keep the four-year veteran off the open market.

It marked the first time under the stewardship of general manager Jerry Angelo, who in the past has acknowledged the potential acrimony that accompanies the franchise marker, the Bears have used the restriction.

The qualifying offer for a franchise linebacker is $7.206 million, the average of the top five highest paid players at the position. But only three days into free agency, top defenders such as cornerback Nate Clements (with San Francisco), edge rusher Adalius Thomas (New England) and middle linebacker London Fletcher-Baker (Washington) have signed lucrative contracts with new teams.

Sitting at home, watching the free agency parade pass him by, Briggs became, he acknowledged, increasingly frustrated by his lot. And not just, he emphasized, by the financial implications of the situation.

"You hate to get into that whole 'lack of respect' thing," Briggs said. "But you play four years for a team, do your best, exceed their expectations, right? And every year, it's like, 'You played great, Lance.' And they kind of dangle the carrot, like they're going to take care of you, and then it doesn't happen. I mean, I was a middle-round pick and I've played well for them. Four years and at just middle-round salaries. I haven't caused any kinds of problems. I've done everything they asked and them some. And I don't know if I ever really knew where I stood with them until they put the tag on me."

A former Arizona State standout, Briggs was chosen by the Bears in the third round of the 2003 draft. He earned a starting job as a rookie, emerged by his third seasons as one of the NFL's top young weakside 'backers, and was chosen for the Pro Bowl in each of the past two seasons.

Even playing in the lengthy shadow of middle linebacker Brian Urlacher, with whom he has become close friends, Briggs is regarded leaguewide as a top defender and playmaker.

He did sit out the voluntary portion of the team's offseason workouts last spring, it should be noted, but reported for the mandatory workouts and was in training camp on time.

There is little doubt that if Briggs was in the unrestricted pool right now, he would be a coveted player. But the Bears seems inclined to force him to play for the one-year franchise offer and there have been no discussions on a long-term deal since last spring. Under the current rules, Chicago has until July 16 to sign Briggs to a longer deal or he must play 2007 for the franchise number.

Which is something, Briggs said Sunday night, he won't do.

"It's a great bunch of guys with a great future, but I can't see myself as being part of that future anymore," Briggs said. "Whatever options are available to me, I'll take advantage of them. But going back and playing for the Bears again, no, I don't see that as an option. Not one more day. Not at all."

Senior writer Len Pasquarelli covers the NFL for ESPN.com.

LINK
 

JonJon

Injured Reserve
Messages
11,262
Reaction score
733
Wow, those are pretty strong feelings that Briggs has about the Bears organization. Makes you wonder what really goes on off the field that causes players to want to leave. I think he has made it clear that even if he is on the roster for the Bears next season that they won't be getting the same pro-bowl value that they have in the past. Would anybody be willing to bite on the trading penalites for a franchised player? I would hope the Cowboys wouldn't. But if the franchise tag is removed then it's a different ball game. As long as Jerry feels that you will help the team win, he will take care of you.
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
WoodysGirl;1406182 said:
A former Arizona State standout, Briggs was chosen by the Bears in the third round of the 2003 draft.

Senior writer Len Pasquarelli covers the NFL for ESPN.com.
Pastabelly, you just made an enemy of half the state of Arizona. :D
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
I think Lovie Smith should have walked too. While you have to be smart with your money, squeezing every ounce of life from your walet will just piss off those working for you.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
The Realist;1406227 said:
Dexter Coakley for Lance Briggs?

Lance Briggs is to small for a 3-4 defense. If made any trade, it would be to trade again. Maybe Chicago's best choice is to trade for a high first round pick.
 

The Realist

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,504
Reaction score
2,027
nyc;1406240 said:
Lance Briggs is to small for a 3-4 defense. If made any trade, it would be to trade again. Maybe Chicago's best choice is to trade for a high first round pick.


How does he compare size wise to what Wade had in SD?

Thanks...
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
The Realist;1406243 said:
How does he compare size wise to what Wade had in SD?

Thanks...

Lance Biggs 240lbs.

Merriman 272lbs, Polk 262lbs, Godfrey 245lbs, Phillips 262lbs.

I beleive these were the starting linebackers. They have smaller ones, but in a 3-4 defense you want your linebackers to be atleast 250lbs and above because you don't have as many defensive lineman to take on the five offensive lineman. A 240lbs linebacker and smaller won't have the ability to get around someone 300lbs and above.
 

mmillman

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,153
Reaction score
35
jdub2k4;1406210 said:
Wow, those are pretty strong feelings that Briggs has about the Bears organization. Makes you wonder what really goes on off the field that causes players to want to leave. I think he has made it clear that even if he is on the roster for the Bears next season that they won't be getting the same pro-bowl value that they have in the past. Would anybody be willing to bite on the trading penalites for a franchised player? I would hope the Cowboys wouldn't. But if the franchise tag is removed then it's a different ball game. As long as Jerry feels that you will help the team win, he will take care of you.

yeah, it came after he saw all of these huge contracts mediocre players are getting.
 

The Realist

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,504
Reaction score
2,027
nyc;1406256 said:
Lance Biggs 240lbs.

Merriman 272lbs, Polk 262lbs, Godfrey 245lbs, Phillips 262lbs.

I beleive these were the starting linebackers. They have smaller ones, but in a 3-4 defense you want your linebackers to be atleast 250lbs and above because you don't have as many defensive lineman to take on the five offensive lineman. A 240lbs linebacker and smaller won't have the ability to get around someone 300lbs and above.


Briggs would obviously play inside in a 3-4.

Polk only started outside when Merriman was suspended and he's a scrub.

You forgot Donnie Edwards at 227 who has been a 5-6 year starter in SD.

240-245 no difference between Godfrey and Briggs. Briggs is better and could put on 5 lbs easily.
 

Cowboys22

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,507
Reaction score
11,384
This is just the beginning. Wait and see. There is going to be an onslaught of disgruntled players in the next year or two. Who are these players you ask? Its simple, big name pro-bowl type players who signed long term deals last year or earlier. There players are now sitting on contracts that are paying them 50-60% of what lesser players are now commanding. I believe many of the players that fall into this category are going to start speaking out and causing trouble hoping to cash in on the new free agent money train. I seriously think we are going to see major fireworks between players and teams with regard to salaries in the next few years!
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
The Realist;1406287 said:
Briggs would obviously play inside in a 3-4.

Polk only started outside when Merriman was suspended and he's a scrub.

You forgot Donnie Edwards at 227 who has been a 5-6 year starter in SD.

240-245 no difference between Godfrey and Briggs. Briggs is better and could put on 5 lbs easily.

He (Edwards) is a Cloakley, Cato June type player. Speed is the name of the game, but they get exposed in the power game. I would much rather have a more complete player. Briggs can play in a 3-4 defense, he just isn't ideal.
 

kevwun

New Member
Messages
447
Reaction score
0
I can't believe the NFLPA ever agreed to the franchise tag in the first place. I also can't believe they still let Gene Upshaw run things.
 

TRUTH87

Cowboy for Life
Messages
5,709
Reaction score
3,948
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2788148

"There's a difference between the Chicago Bears team and the Chicago Bears organization," Briggs told ESPN.com, when reached Sunday evening at his home in suburban Chicago. "The Chicago Bears team? The coaches, players, city and fans? Yeah, I could stay there forever. I love it. But the Chicago Bears organization? I don't want to be there anymore. I won't play for them and I'll do everything in my power to keep from playing there."
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,571
Reaction score
27,856
kØwbØy;1406972 said:
"There's a difference between the Chicago Bears team and the Chicago Bears organization," Briggs told ESPN.com, when reached Sunday evening at his home in suburban Chicago. "The Chicago Bears team? The coaches, players, city and fans? Yeah, I could stay there forever. I love it. But the Chicago Bears organization? I don't want to be there anymore. I won't play for them and I'll do everything in my power to keep from playing there."

WOW!!

And what sad about the whole thing is that Chicago is a huge market. Its not as if they have to be cheap about this type of thing. Cleveland of all places is shelling out cash and Chicago is being cheap. Sounds like new ownership is needed.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,571
Reaction score
27,856
nyc;1406329 said:
He (Edwards) is a Cloakley, Cato June type player. Speed is the name of the game, but they get exposed in the power game. I would much rather have a more complete player. Briggs can play in a 3-4 defense, he just isn't ideal.

Edwards has been playing at an elitel elvel in the 3-4 at San Diego for 5 years now. WTH are you talking about? Exposed to what? Playing very well?

Briggs is light years ahead of Ayodele and Ayodele was our second best LBer last year
 

EastDallasCowboy

New Member
Messages
940
Reaction score
0
Normally I don't side with players when it comes to salary disputes, but I see where this guy is coming from.
 

jman

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,766
Reaction score
25
Briggs to Bears: Rescind the tag or trade me

By Len Pasquarelli
ESPN.com

"There's a difference between the Chicago Bears team and the Chicago Bears organization," Briggs told ESPN.com, when reached Sunday evening at his home in suburban Chicago. "The Chicago Bears team? The coaches, players, city and fans? Yeah, I could stay there forever. I love it. But the Chicago Bears organization? I don't want to be there anymore. I won't play for them and I'll do everything in my power to keep from playing there."

And he offered, Briggs said, what is the only truly viable solution to an untenable circumstance.

"They need to either [rescind] the franchise tag, and let me move on, or trade me to another team," Briggs said. "Because that's about the only way this thing can have any kind of a positive resolution."

"
You hate to get into that whole 'lack of respect' thing," Briggs said. "But you play four years for a team, do your best, exceed their expectations, right? And every year, it's like, 'You played great, Lance.' And they kind of dangle the carrot, like they're going to take care of you, and then it doesn't happen. I mean, I was a middle-round pick and I've played well for them. Four years and at just middle-round salaries. I haven't caused any kinds of problems. I've done everything they asked and them some. And I don't know if I ever really knew where I stood with them until they put the tag on me."

There is little doubt that if Briggs was in the unrestricted pool right now, he would be a coveted player. But the Bears seems inclined to force him to play for the one-year franchise offer and there have been no discussions on a long-term deal since last spring. Under the current rules, Chicago has until July 16 to sign Briggs to a longer deal or he must play 2007 for the franchise number.

Which is something, Briggs said Sunday night, he won't do.

"It's a great bunch of guys with a great future, but I can't see myself as being part of that future anymore," Briggs said. "Whatever options are available to me, I'll take advantage of them. But going back and playing for the Bears again, no, I don't see that as an option. Not one more day. Not at all."

Wow...if you know who said all that, the world would have exploded and ESPN would be running the story 24/7...LOL
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
The Bears have been cheap for years now. They have the money- they just hate to spend it. The whole mess with Lovie just underlined it. Its been talked about a lot but never really got put out there in public like it has been the last couple of months. wait untill they have to actually sign a FA for real money- and the rest of the team working for a lot less just has one more reason to hate management.
 
Top