ESPN MacMahon: Proving Ground: Brandon Williams

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
78,798
Reaction score
43,756
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Jul 6
12:00
PM CT
http://espn.go.com/blog/dallas/cowb...velopmental-dandies-brandon-williams#comments
By Tim MacMahon

Second in a 10-part series focusing on young non-starters who have a lot to prove during training camp (series):

[+] Enlarge AP Photo/Tony GutierrezBrandon Williams missed all of his rookie season with a knee injury after leading the Big 12 in sacks as a junior at Texas Tech.


Brandon Williams’ burst is back.

That was the encouraging word coming from Valley Ranch in the spring after the ex-Texas Tech pass rusher missed all of his rookie season due to a knee injury.

The Cowboys’ coaching staff saw enough from Williams during training camp last season to believe that he had potential to contribute as a situational pass rusher. They were intrigued by the way Williams, who led the Big 12 in sacks as a junior before declaring for the draft, exploded off the ball and had a knack for getting to the quarterback.

Then Williams, a defensive end in college who is making the transition to outside linebacker, spent the season on injured reserve after he tore up his knee while covering a punt during a preseason game.

It’s unlikely that Williams will ever emerge as a starter for the Cowboys. The Cowboys got a long-term deal done with perennial All-Pro DeMarcus Ware last season, and they envision Anthony Spencer wreaking havoc on the other side for the foreseeable future.

But depth behind the dominant duo is a concern. The ideal situation would be for Williams or fellow 2009 fourth-rounder Victor Butler to give the coaches enough confidence to use them in pass-rushing situations for about 10 plays per game, helping keep Ware and Spencer fresh late in games and down the stretch of the season. Butler didn’t seize the opportunity as a rookie.

Wade Phillips has proven that he’ll come up with creative substitution packages to occasionally put another edge rusher on the field if he has three good ones. It’s up to Williams to prove that he warrants playing time.
 

JeffInDC

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,004
Reaction score
3,152
Scary thought..............what if Ware stays healthy for 16 games, Spencer picks up were he left off in the 2nd half of the year, Butler completely "gets it", and B. Williams really does have that burst back that made him so good TTU? The NFL team sack record is 72 by the '84 Bears. Could this year's squad challenge that? HMMMMMMMMM............................................
 

Nexx

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,965
Reaction score
5,265
JeffInDC;3452422 said:
Scary thought..............what if Ware stays healthy for 16 games, Spencer picks up were he left off in the 2nd half of the year, Butler completely "gets it", and B. Williams really does have that burst back that made him so good TTU? The NFL team sack record is 72 by the '84 Bears. Could this year's squad challenge that? HMMMMMMMMM............................................

how about no. our ends give us nothing in the sack department even though its a 3-4 you wouldnt mind seeing 4 to 5 sacks from each end, plus we dont safety or corner blitz much. so basically you are depending on ware, spencer and ratliff to get at least 60 of the 72 sacks to be approach that goal. it aint gonna happen
 

jchocolate82

Member
Messages
682
Reaction score
4
Nexx;3452435 said:
how about no. our ends give us nothing in the sack department even though its a 3-4 you wouldnt mind seeing 4 to 5 sacks from each end, plus we dont safety or corner blitz much. so basically you are depending on ware, spencer and ratliff to get at least 60 of the 72 sacks to be approach that goal. it aint gonna happen

MAN!!! way to crush someones excitement and hope
 

rkell87

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,443
Reaction score
880
Nexx;3452435 said:
how about no. our ends give us nothing in the sack department even though its a 3-4 you wouldnt mind seeing 4 to 5 sacks from each end, plus we dont safety or corner blitz much. so basically you are depending on ware, spencer and ratliff to get at least 60 of the 72 sacks to be approach that goal. it aint gonna happen
im down with 26 from ware, 19 from spencer, and 15 from rat lol
 

proline

Active Member
Messages
1,377
Reaction score
1
Just a guess ....

Ware ..................... 16
Spencer .................. 13
James .................... 5
Ratliff .................... 5
Lee ......................... 4
Brooking ................. 3
B. Williams .............. 3
J. Williams ............... 3
Spears ......................2
Bowen ..................... 2
Hatcher .................... 2
Butler ....................... 2
Sensabaugh ............... 1
Olshansky .................. 1

TOTAL .................... 62
 

Wood

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,447
Reaction score
5,697
thats alot of sacks for Lee (4). Guys who can rush the passer are like good CB...u can never have enough. Someone is gonna suprise us this year that wasnt involved last year (both williams, lee, guy from colts) on an already good defense. Its exciting. On paper it does look like 60 sack defense.
 

67CowboysFan

New Member
Messages
2,345
Reaction score
1
Wood;3452838 said:
thats alot of sacks for Lee (4). Guys who can rush the passer are like good CB...u can never have enough. Someone is gonna suprise us this year that wasnt involved last year (both williams, lee, guy from colts) on an already good defense. Its exciting. On paper it does look like 60 sack defense.
If Ware and Spencer are hot all season 60 is very doable. Who you gonna double team?
 

proline

Active Member
Messages
1,377
Reaction score
1
Wood;3452838 said:
thats alot of sacks for Lee (4). Guys who can rush the passer are like good CB...u can never have enough. Someone is gonna suprise us this year that wasnt involved last year (both williams, lee, guy from colts) on an already good defense. Its exciting. On paper it does look like 60 sack defense.

I think he may become a decent blitzer from the inside, but I'm also anticipating him running the QB down a time or two on the outside.
 
Top