ESPN poll: best qb in nfc east

DanManJ

Well-Known Member
Messages
404
Reaction score
470
Romo in last with 13%:rolleyes:

Mcnabb in the lead with 35% with vick right behind him with 30%. Gotta love the hate.
 
I saw this last night. Probably RIGHT NOW McNabb and Vick are plahying better, but that's judging from 2 games. I think until there is a little more history it makes more sense to vote for the QB's who have done the best over the last year or two, and that would be Romo and Eli (as much as I hate to say it).
 
McNabb is #1, no doubt, after that it's a toss up between the remaining 3.
 
2 games into the season romo is 0-2 with 2 picks you want them to vote him the best?

......
 
Section444;3580563 said:
McNabb is #1, no doubt, after that it's a toss up between the remaining 3.

I don't think it's close.

1. McNabb
2. Romo
3. Manning
4. Vick

And that's not saying Michael Vick is bad, either. But you've got to look at the guy's career passer rating and completion %.
 
hmcorp;3580701 said:
1-1
1-1
1-1
0-2

sounds right to me.

wins. all that matters.

Pretty much. And in Vick's case he probably would've been #1 had he been starting for jump.

Currently? Its right. Romo is playing like the worst qb in the NFC East. Followed by Eli than Vick and McNabb but I believe Vick has done more for his team than McNabb has.
 
rocyaice;3580708 said:
Pretty much. And in Vick's case he probably would've been #1 had he been starting for jump.

Currently? Its right. Romo is playing like the worst qb in the NFC East. Followed by Eli than Vick and McNabb but I believe Vick has done more for his team than McNabb has.


winning. stats dont mean crap.

win the game. you dont win. you suck. team game or not.
 
hmcorp;3580711 said:
winning. stats dont mean crap.

win the game. you dont win. you suck. team game or not.

Well stats do mean something. If Romo plays lights out and the defense gives up big plays to the Texans? Chalk that up as a L. Especially when you have no field goal kicker.
 
casmith07;3580697 said:
I don't think it's close.

1. McNabb
2. Romo
3. Manning
4. Vick

And that's not saying Michael Vick is bad, either. But you've got to look at the guy's career passer rating and completion %.
I still put Manning in front of Romo.
 
Section444;3580801 said:
I still put Manning in front of Romo.

Did you watch Eli's last game? It was laughably bad. Not to mention his 3 int game vs the panthers.
 
hmcorp;3580711 said:
winning. stats dont mean crap.

win the game. you dont win. you suck. team game or not.

Good to know Romo sucks now. What idiotic logic. :laugh2:
 
Gemini Dolly;3580829 said:
Isnt it just sad when you cant even win over your own state??

It's the same reason why our own fans don't vote our players to the probowl. Worst fans in all of sports.
 
urface59;3580833 said:
Did you watch Eli's last game? It was laughably bad. Not to mention his 3 int game vs the panthers.
Haven't missed a single NFL game in 5 years (this will be my 6th). Over-all, Eli Manning is the more polished of the two QB's to this point in their careers. The truth hurts, I know.
 
Section444;3581156 said:
Haven't missed a single NFL game in 5 years (this will be my 6th). Over-all, Eli Manning is the more polished of the two QB's to this point in their careers. The truth hurts, I know.

Yeah that's why ROmo has more TDs, yards and wins, probowls, etc. in his time. Good truth.
 
Section444;3581156 said:
Haven't missed a single NFL game in 5 years (this will be my 6th). Over-all, Eli Manning is the more polished of the two QB's to this point in their careers. The truth hurts, I know.

ummmmmm no...............
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,003
Messages
14,505,693
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top