Section444;3580563 said:McNabb is #1, no doubt, after that it's a toss up between the remaining 3.
hmcorp;3580701 said:1-1
1-1
1-1
0-2
sounds right to me.
wins. all that matters.
rocyaice;3580708 said:Pretty much. And in Vick's case he probably would've been #1 had he been starting for jump.
Currently? Its right. Romo is playing like the worst qb in the NFC East. Followed by Eli than Vick and McNabb but I believe Vick has done more for his team than McNabb has.
hmcorp;3580711 said:winning. stats dont mean crap.
win the game. you dont win. you suck. team game or not.
I still put Manning in front of Romo.casmith07;3580697 said:I don't think it's close.
1. McNabb
2. Romo
3. Manning
4. Vick
And that's not saying Michael Vick is bad, either. But you've got to look at the guy's career passer rating and completion %.
Section444;3580801 said:I still put Manning in front of Romo.
hmcorp;3580711 said:winning. stats dont mean crap.
win the game. you dont win. you suck. team game or not.
Gemini Dolly;3580829 said:Isnt it just sad when you cant even win over your own state??
Haven't missed a single NFL game in 5 years (this will be my 6th). Over-all, Eli Manning is the more polished of the two QB's to this point in their careers. The truth hurts, I know.urface59;3580833 said:Did you watch Eli's last game? It was laughably bad. Not to mention his 3 int game vs the panthers.
Section444;3581156 said:Haven't missed a single NFL game in 5 years (this will be my 6th). Over-all, Eli Manning is the more polished of the two QB's to this point in their careers. The truth hurts, I know.
Section444;3581156 said:Haven't missed a single NFL game in 5 years (this will be my 6th). Over-all, Eli Manning is the more polished of the two QB's to this point in their careers. The truth hurts, I know.
