ESPN then vs. now

JordanTaber

Benched
Messages
609
Reaction score
0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D998CXtHLZU

Can you imagine how ESPN would report this story TODAY?

The network isn't even recognizable anymore. ESPN in the 90's and ESPN in the 2000's (circa 2001 or so) are two completely different things...so far removed it can not be understated.

But they're living off the strong reputation they forged for themselves in the 80's and 90's, and that's the problem. Most sports fans actually think they're still a credible network.
 

bootsy

Benched
Messages
892
Reaction score
0
JordanTaber;2575913 said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D998CXtHLZU

Can you imagine how ESPN would report this story TODAY?

The network isn't even recognizable anymore. ESPN in the 90's and ESPN in the 2000's (circa 2001 or so) are two completely different things...so far removed it can not be understated.

But they're living off the strong reputation they forged for themselves in the 80's and 90's, and that's the problem. Most sports fans actually think they're still a credible network.
It is a big difference. Today's ESPN would have showed that clip followed by going live to Chris Mortensen or Ed Werder and then some psychologist or Roger Cossack or somebody like that would overanalyze it for about 10 more minutes and they would continue to talk about this for the entire hour of SportsCenter saying it "Breaking News" or "Developing Story". Meanwhile everything else going on in sports would be pushed to side.
 

Rogah

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,473
Reaction score
793
JordanTaber;2575913 said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D998CXtHLZU

Can you imagine how ESPN would report this story TODAY?
It would be 25 seconds of substantive news and then 45 minutes of talking heads arguing over what he should do, what the league should do, what it means to the Packers, what it means to the NFL, what it means to the sporting world, etc, etc, etc...
 

Yakuza Rich

Well-Known Member
Messages
18,043
Reaction score
12,385
Well, we're assuming that BSP...err, I mean ESPN would report anything negative on Favre first.

In all seriousness, this is the way you handle a situation like this. Olbermann being very serious, no sensationalizing of the story, no Favre apologists, just reporting the facts in a serious, professional tone. People hate Olbermann for his political beliefs, but back in this time he was fabulous at BSP...err, I mean ESPN.

I think the real problem with BSP...err, I mean ESPN is the success of Chris Berman. He became popular and their ratings went up because of it. So then you had more anchors who wanted to be like Berman so they could gain his type of fame and the producers were all for because they felt it could boost ratings.

And then a lot of the things Berman does/did weren't helping matters either. I remember watching him announce some Hall of Famers and instead of just announcing the HOF'ers and their accomplishments, he went into his played out and old 'nickname' spiel. Not to put over the HOF'ers, but to interject himself into the ceremony and put HIMSELF over.

And over the years the rest of BSP...err, I mean ESPN show hosts and 'reporters' have done the same thing and ESPN has enabled them to do so at the expense of professionalism, ethics and quality journalism.




YAKUZA
 

JordanTaber

Benched
Messages
609
Reaction score
0
Yakuza Rich;2578519 said:
Well, we're assuming that BSP...err, I mean ESPN would report anything negative on Favre first.

In all seriousness, this is the way you handle a situation like this. Olbermann being very serious, no sensationalizing of the story, no Favre apologists, just reporting the facts in a serious, professional tone. People hate Olbermann for his political beliefs, but back in this time he was fabulous at BSP...err, I mean ESPN.

I think the real problem with BSP...err, I mean ESPN is the success of Chris Berman. He became popular and their ratings went up because of it. So then you had more anchors who wanted to be like Berman so they could gain his type of fame and the producers were all for because they felt it could boost ratings.

And then a lot of the things Berman does/did weren't helping matters either. I remember watching him announce some Hall of Famers and instead of just announcing the HOF'ers and their accomplishments, he went into his played out and old 'nickname' spiel. Not to put over the HOF'ers, but to interject himself into the ceremony and put HIMSELF over.

And over the years the rest of BSP...err, I mean ESPN show hosts and 'reporters' have done the same thing and ESPN has enabled them to do so at the expense of professionalism, ethics and quality journalism.




YAKUZA

You make an interesting point about Berman, but I think the problem with Sportscenter, which was ESPN's signature program, had more to do with the departure of a few popular anchors in the late 90's (namely Olbermann and Charlie Steiner) and the anchors/writers as a whole getting really lazy and not putting the wit into the dialog that made the program so successful. They rested on their laurels, saw the ratings decline, and then panicked, not sure of why it happened.

Instead of focusing on getting back to dancing with what brought them there, they (and the rest of ESPN) opted to look around them at reality TV and the WWE....deciding that was the direction they needed to take. New Sportscenter was born.

ESPN then added Around the Horn and Pardon The Interruption to their daily lineup, saw that they drew good ratings, and created 3-4 more shows just like them--same ****, different pile...in different wrapping paper. Cold Pizz..err, First and 10, Mike & Mike...hey, now they can bring Jim Rome back to the network to let him put you to sleep with forced rants.

What is most amazing about the transformation is the morphing of perfectly solid, credible, professional, news-first reporters to grade A *******s. John Clayton? He's an ******* now. He had to be to survive. Same with Chris Mortenson. Same with Chris Berman, who, while different in the way you stated, still made a point of staying out of interjecting with his opinion on matters 24/7.

Same with Tom Jackson. Even Dan Patrick let everything go to his head and got his own radio show, where he proceeded to act like a pompous piece of ****.

Only one has resisted--Bob Ley. I think that's because he has more power than any other television personality there--he's been there pretty much since the network's beginning, and he refuses to sink to that level. He knows Dick Schaap is turning in his grave over what the network has become.
 

Sarge

Red, White and Brew...
Staff member
Messages
33,771
Reaction score
31,538
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Here's an idear - if you don't like ESPN - don't watch it.
 

JordanTaber

Benched
Messages
609
Reaction score
0
Sarge;2582567 said:
Here's an idear - if you don't like ESPN - don't watch it.

Oh believe me, I avoid it as much as possible these days.

Unfortunately, I have to put up with their awful Monday Night Football coverage.
 
Top