TO brought this on himself by being a pain in the *** everywhere he has played. Now he has put himself in a box where this is the kind of questioning he is going to get when things aren't going well for him. I am glad he is not with the Cowboys anymore. This guy is true headache and brings everybody down with him. I don't know how the Cowboys are going to do without TO but it is nice to know after a tough loss against the Giants or even in wins not to hear TO whine to Deion or Michael or Stephen A. Smith about how he is not getting the ball. About how he could really make this team something special if the ball was thrown to him more and on and on every freaking week. Good riddance. Now he is Buffalo's problem.Yakuza Rich;2981006 said:Exactly.
The writer here trying to act like the media wasn't trying to goad him is beyond ridiculous. The media was one step short of actually yelling out loud 'T.O., I'M TRYING TO GET YOU TO THROW YOUR TEAMMATES UNDER THE BUS...HOW BAD IS THE BUFFALO BILLS OFFENSIVE SCHEME?'
But I think this goes to show you how bad the Dallas media is. This is now being exposed as the media trying to goad him because there are enough members of the Buffalo media that support Owens in this case. In Dallas, the entire local Dallas media banded together and just railed against him. Sadly now that Owens is gone, the local Dallas media goes on to try and goad other players.
Probably even sillier is the author's example of Lee Evans' response. If Owens would've said that, the media would've twisted in saying that he wanted the ball more. This is the same media that claimed he was crying after the Bengals game because he didn't get the ball enough (he had a game winning TD) when the reality was a close friend of his died earlier that week.
I should probably let it go, but it's still not right and it needs to be known that it's not right.
YAKUZA
I post compelling NFL news in the NFL Zone. It is why we have this forum. If you have a problem with that then I would suggest you completely ignore this particular forum and enjoy the others.Vtwin;2981265 said:The morbid fascination with a player who is no longer on the team in a manner that has nothing to do with the game of football.
It's like crossing Entertainment Tonight with The Young and the Restless.
You're better then that.
Aren't you?
Hostile;2981953 said:I post compelling NFL news in the NFL Zone. It is why we have this forum. If you have a problem with that then I would suggest you completely ignore this particular forum and enjoy the others.
I refuse to cater to the whims of the easily offended. Compelling news is compelling news.
Where was this mantra of move on from you during the Michael Vick saga? Where has it been for other topics. Is it just seeing an article about Owens that offends you?
Vtwin;2981993 said:Offends me?
I assure you I'm not offended in any way shape or form.
I'm just pointing out that it looks silly and childish in a soap operaish way to post threads about how someone behaves in an interview. The only relevance it has to football is that he plays the game.
None of this compelling information makes one bit of difference to any team in the NFL unlike the Vick saga.
I guess we have different standards as to determine what is "compelling".
I didn't realize you were so easily offended.
Please carry on....
stilltheguru;2981180 said:There won't be one TO thread on this whole board if he starts playing like I know he is capable of.
Some of yall are no different than Commander fans, seriously. Frontrunners talking trash
It sure looks like you are offended from here, and that the thing that offends you is that it's about Terrell Owens and he is gone. There is no other plausible reason for you to object to the article and to say this article doesn't make "one bit of difference to any team in the NFL" and in the same sentence maintain that the Vick saga does. I may be wrong, but I think this saga make "one bit of difference" to the Bills. Therefore it being in the NFL Zone is the correct place for it since the last time I checked the Buffalo Bills were in the NFL.Vtwin;2981993 said:Offends me?
I assure you I'm not offended in any way shape or form.
I'm just pointing out that it looks silly and childish in a soap operaish way to post threads about how someone behaves in an interview. The only relevance it has to football is that he plays the game.
None of this compelling information makes one bit of difference to any team in the NFL unlike the Vick saga.
I guess we have different standards as to determine what is "compelling".
I didn't realize you were so easily offended.
Please carry on....
That's a big IF at this point.stilltheguru;2981180 said:There won't be one TO thread on this whole board if he starts playing like I know he is capable of.
Some of yall are no different than Commander fans, seriously. Frontrunners talking trash
Doomsday101;2981997 said:Being a defender of TO is not playing a role in any of this?
Hostile;2982046 said:It sure looks like you are offended from here, and that the thing that offends you is that it's about Terrell Owens and he is gone. There is no other plausible reason for you to object to the article and to say this article doesn't make "one bit of difference to any team in the NFL" and in the same sentence maintain that the Vick saga does. I may be wrong, but I think this saga make "one bit of difference" to the Bills. Therefore it being in the NFL Zone is the correct place for it since the last time I checked the Buffalo Bills were in the NFL.
Let me clue you in, I didn't write the article. So take it up with the author if you don't like the content of his article. He's the one writing the "soap opera" that you object to, not me. All I did was copy and paste.
I am amused, not offended. This was so transparent that it was actually funny. Notice that several posters besides me had similar reactions.
I will carry on, thank you for your concern.
Vtwin;2982637 said:If you guy's would stop asking me questions I would stop bothering you in this thread.
I'm not a "defender of TO". I'm sure I am on record on this forum stating that I did not want him to come here. Once he was here I did give him a chance and actually gained some respect for him because he clearly is a target for any media jerk with a microphone no matter what he does.
Having said all that, I was NOT sorry to see him leave simply because no matter who's fault it is there will always be a circus atmosphere around the man. He did make his bed and the media will always make damn sure he lies in it. Because of that he wil always be a distraction for whichever team he is on.
I have no respect for the media who areconstantly trying to create something out of nothing with TO and that is exactly what this thread appears to be doing to.
Which is why I made my original comment.
Hostile;2982046 said:the last time I checked the Buffalo Bills were in the NFL.
the kid 05;2982666 said:lets be honest. they haven't been in the NFL since the late 90's. Pretty much how there is no real football team in Houston or Cleavland.
Vtwin;2982651 said:The "plausible" reason why I posted my initial comment is because I felt embarrased for you and this forum for stopping to such a checkout line newstand level.
zrinkill;2982710 said:No it is not ..... we both know why you initially posted in this thread.
:laugh2:
Doomsday101;2982656 said:Well we talk about a lot of players, McNabb, Vick many different QB's, coaches and other matter related to the NFL. TO is a part of the NFL he is a guy who is in the news and being a former player with Dallas it is not shocking that he would be talked about on a Cowboys message board.
Vtwin;2982761 said:Since you are mind reader... what am I thinking right now? :laugh1:
As I do with many other compelling NFL topics of which you have not objected to. That was the point, is the point, and will always be the point. Why no objections to injury threads? Why no objections to Plaxico Burress threads? The topic is TO and suddenly the advice from you is to "let it go already."Vtwin;2982651 said::laugh2:
Oh puhleeze.
Offended over an article about a sports figure. :laugh2:
Let me clue you in. I have a life. Sports is simply an avenue of entertainment which can provide a distraction from the everyday ups and down of real life. Nothing I have ever read on this forum has "offended" me. There are many "plausible" reasons to pick from if one wished to see the truth as it is rather then the truth they wish to see it.
Clearly you didn't write the article. You did however choose to bring it to the attention of this forum.
The "plausible" reason why I posted my initial comment is because I felt embarrased for you and this forum for stopping to such a checkout line newstand level.
But hey... If you're ok with it who am I to say different?
oh and.
I'm not sorry TO is gone as I have clearly stated in more then one thread on this forum.