ESPN Watkins: Choice's bigger role should benefit Barber

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,281
Reaction score
45,652
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
October 20, 2009, 3:00 PM

By: Tim MacMahon


Tashard Choice has earned a significant role in the Dallas Cowboys' offense. Wade Phillips said so last week. Jerry Jones reiterated the point today.

So that begs the question: how should the load be split between Marion Barber and Choice?

Felix Jones is a separate part of the equation because his big-play ability provides a different dimension. Of course, that's when Jones is healthy, which isn't often. In order to maximize his effectiveness and minimize the injury risk, the Cowboys have to keep Jones in a change-of-pace role, limiting his touches to less than 10 per game and leaving the bulk of the workload for the other two backs.

Choice deserves to split the rest of the work with Barber. That would also be in the best interests of Barber, a bruising runner who hasn't been able to stay healthy since becoming a starter.

With Choice available, there's no reason to push Barber past a dozen carries per game, which appears to be his optimum production point. That's especially true as long as Barber's quadriceps is less than completely healthy, which could be the case for most of the season.

Choice isn't as powerful as Barber, but he's just as well-rounded. Choice has also been more productive than Barber when given chances. His career averages per carry (5.1-4.3) and catch (8.4-7.6) are better than Barber. And that can't be considered a fluke, since a bunch of Choice's work came against elite defenses (Steelers, Giants, Ravens, Eagles) last December.

Barber was at his best in 2006 and '07, when he was a part-time back who excelled in the red zone and at the end of games. He parlayed that production into a superstar deal (seven years, $45 million), but the Cowboys can't let his contract cloud their thinking.

At some point, Choice's success could make Barber and his big salary expendable. For now, Choice is a proven back who allows the Cowboys to put Barber in position to succeed in smaller doses.
 

MichaelWinicki

"You want some?"
Staff member
Messages
47,997
Reaction score
27,917
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
WoodysGirl;3025838 said:
At some point, Choice's success could make Barber and his big salary expendable.

Bingo!

I don't want to see MBIII go, but the fact is that he will be a marketable commodity this off-season. I don't think he'll fetch a 1st rounder, but who knows about a 2nd.
 

dbair1967

Arch Defender
Messages
30,782
Reaction score
1
MichaelWinicki;3025872 said:
Bingo!

I don't want to see MBIII go, but the fact is that he will be a marketable commodity this off-season. I don't think he'll fetch a 1st rounder, but who knows about a 2nd.

I dont think he's tradable with that contract, especially considering he's been injured two seasons in a row now.

His case with Tashard Choice here is a crowning example of why teams shouldnt spend huge dollars on RB's unless they are truly special players. Barber when healthy is a very good player, but IMO is not an elite player. We paid him like an elite player. Choice on the other hand has been very good as well most of the time when he's gotten reps, and he makes nowhere near the same money.
 

Bluefin

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,209
Reaction score
9,677
MichaelWinicki;3025872 said:
I don't want to see MBIII go, but the fact is that he will be a marketable commodity this off-season. I don't think he'll fetch a 1st rounder, but who knows about a 2nd.

A team would have to renegotiate Marion barber's contract before trading for him because they wouldn't want to pay him what he will be owed.

I expect MB3 will remain a Cowboy until we deem him expendable because of his salary (maybe he'll restructure) and our other backs.
 

Chocolate Lab

Run-loving Dino
Messages
37,118
Reaction score
11,474
dbair1967;3025877 said:
I dont think he's tradable with that contract, especially considering he's been injured two seasons in a row now.

His case with Tashard Choice here is a crowning example of why teams shouldnt spend huge dollars on RB's unless they are truly special players. Barber when healthy is a very good player, but IMO is not an elite player. We paid him like an elite player. Choice on the other hand has been very good as well most of the time when he's gotten reps, and he makes nowhere near the same money.

Exactly. Love Barber's heart, but never liked that contract we gave him. He's not an elite talent.
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
dbair1967;3025877 said:
I dont think he's tradable with that contract, especially considering he's been injured two seasons in a row now.

His case with Tashard Choice here is a crowning example of why teams shouldnt spend huge dollars on RB's unless they are truly special players. Barber when healthy is a very good player, but IMO is not an elite player. We paid him like an elite player. Choice on the other hand has been very good as well most of the time when he's gotten reps, and he makes nowhere near the same money.

Are you stealing my thunder again, David?
 

WarDaddy

kidcrook
Messages
1,480
Reaction score
1,015
Choice should have been the starter since the 1st Commanders game last season.

Barber is best in his 2007 role. Choice is far better in the Julius Jones role than Julius Jones was in 07.

Why not play them the same way?

Barber was a Pro-Bowler in this role, I doubt he could complain much. Choice brings a significant amount of enthusiasm and energy, similar to Barber.

Moving these guys in and out of the lineup with a sprinkle of Felix Jones, maybe a little wildcat, would demoralize any defense and Romo would average like 10 yards per attempt.

I don't see the harm in starting Choice, at all.
 

NextGenBoys

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,252
Reaction score
1,964
MichaelWinicki;3025872 said:
Bingo!

I don't want to see MBIII go, but the fact is that he will be a marketable commodity this off-season. I don't think he'll fetch a 1st rounder, but who knows about a 2nd.

Anything less than a first and it's a travesty. You dont trade away players like Marion Barber. You just dont do it.
 

NextGenBoys

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,252
Reaction score
1,964
kidcrook;3025994 said:
Choice should have been the starter since the 1st Commanders game last season.

Barber is best in his 2007 role. Choice is far better in the Julius Jones role than Julius Jones was in 07.

Why not play them the same way?

Barber was a Pro-Bowler in this role, I doubt he could complain much. Choice brings a significant amount of enthusiasm and energy, similar to Barber.

Moving these guys in and out of the lineup with a sprinkle of Felix Jones, maybe a little wildcat, would demoralize any defense and Romo would average like 10 yards per attempt.

I don't see the harm in starting Choice, at all.

Choice has a quicker first step in and out of cuts, and has more burst hitting the hole. I say start Choice and give him the first series or two, then go with Barber/Felix with a little Choice sprinkled in here and there.
 

Cover 2

Pessimists Unite!!!
Messages
3,496
Reaction score
452
Hopefully. Barber is best as the closer. When the defense is worn out, and Barber is fresh is when most of his highlights came from.
 

casmith07

Attorney-at-Zone
Messages
31,538
Reaction score
9,312
Cover 2;3026046 said:
Hopefully. Barber is best as the closer. When the defense is worn out, and Barber is fresh is when most of his highlights came from.

I love your "favorite players" signature :lmao2:
 

kmd24

Active Member
Messages
3,436
Reaction score
0
Running backs are a dime a dozen, and they don't take much time to develop. That makes it them cheap and disposable.

Barber's good, but he's not an elite talent. He wouldn't fetch much in a trade. I like the player; just being realistic.
 

Bleu Star

Bye Felicia!
Messages
33,925
Reaction score
19,920
WoodysGirl;3025838 said:
October 20, 2009, 3:00 PM

By: Tim MacMahon


Tashard Choice has earned a significant role in the Dallas Cowboys' offense. Wade Phillips said so last week. Jerry Jones reiterated the point today.


Choice deserves to split the rest of the work with Barber. That would also be in the best interests of Barber, a bruising runner who hasn't been able to stay healthy since becoming a starter.

With Choice available, there's no reason to push Barber past a dozen carries per game, which appears to be his optimum production point. That's especially true as long as Barber's quadriceps is less than completely healthy, which could be the case for most of the season.

At some point, Choice's success could make Barber and his big salary expendable. For now, Choice is a proven back who allows the Cowboys to put Barber in position to succeed in smaller doses.

Great write up. Bravoooooooooo... Yes. By having Choice step up it means we will get something of strong value in return for MB3 should we decide to shop him in the offseason. Perhaps we'll find a sucker out there. Not quite Herschel Walker proportions but we could net something substantial in return if we look to do it while he is still relevant...
 

Future

Intramural Legend
Messages
27,566
Reaction score
14,714
I like Choice too...but he shouldn't get more touches than either of the other 2.
 

WV Cowboy

Waitin' on the 6th
Messages
11,604
Reaction score
1,744
NextGenBoys;3026011 said:
Anything less than a first and it's a travesty. You dont trade away players like Marion Barber. You just dont do it.

So you were against the Herschel Walker trade?

Never say never.
 
Top