ESPN's best young QBs

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
78,798
Reaction score
43,756
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Scouts, Inc. ranks Tony Romo fourth among young QBs

2:50 PM Thu, Sep 18, 2008 | Permalink | Yahoo! Buzz
Tim MacMahon http://www.***BANNED-URL***/blogs/images/email-icon.jpg E-mail http://www.***BANNED-URL***/blogs/images/email-icon.jpg News tips


Scouts, Inc. decided to debate who the best young quarterbacks in the league are, and Tony Romo didn't fare as well as I figured he would.

Pittsburgh's Ben Roethlisberger, the Giants' Eli Manning and Denver's Jay Cutler are considered better than Romo by the Scouts, Inc. panel. San Diego's Phillip Rivers was fifth, with Green Bay's Aaron Rodgers, Cleveland's Derek Anderson and Buffalo's Trent Edward as honorable mentions.

Scouts, Inc. apparently changed its mind since the season started. They had Romo ranked above all the quarterbacks on that list other than Big Ben entering the season. Perhaps they found some flaws in his back-to-back 300-yard performances.




http://www.***BANNED-URL***/images/ice3/icons/blog.gif Comments (1) Leave comment | http://www.***BANNED-URL***/blogs/images/email-icon.jpg E-mail entry
 

WV Cowboy

Waitin' on the 6th
Messages
11,604
Reaction score
1,744
I take Romo over Roethlisberger any day of the week.

Especially when coming from behind. ( see the Eagles game the other night, or the Buffalo game last year, etc. )

Roethlisberger is good when the Steelers get the lead, (which they seem to do quite a bit) but if they need him to bring them from behind, not as good.

But he has improved and is a very good QB. I liked him at Miami as well.
 

VACowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,983
Reaction score
3,850
I'll laud Roethlisberger when h is asked to be the focus of the offense instead of a complimentary piece to the running game. What's his record in games where he throws more than 20 times?

I think Cutler's physical tools make him special, but Eli? Not for my money, and I bet a vast majority of NFL GMs would take Romo over Manning too. The irony is that Tony is being downgraded for something Eli has been through himself.
 

viman96

Thread Killer
Messages
21,395
Reaction score
22,345
Same old story from the media about Romo. He will not get the next level of respect until he wins in the postseason.
 

The Rawhide Kid

Gunslinger
Messages
756
Reaction score
10
It shocked me to see that several of these "experts" chose Manning as their franchise QB. The Giants D won that Superbowl. Manning happened to have one miraculous play so now he's a football genius. Disgusting.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,756
Reaction score
21,941
ThreeSportStar80;2269439 said:
I wouldn't rate anyone higher than Romo, except possibly for Roethlisberger...

Crapfilledburger, Manning, and Rivers easily on the bottom of that list. Take away Roethlistburger's running game and he is dog meat.
 

djtavo

Jesus is Lord
Messages
1,019
Reaction score
0
Romo should be #1 no doubt about it....
#2 should be david carr and everyone else after ... lol
 

Doomsday

Rising Star
Messages
19,824
Reaction score
16,113
Anyone who has Eli ranked over Romo and Big Ben isnt worth listening to. Their opinion means notta in my opinion.
 

MONT17

New Member
Messages
3,269
Reaction score
0
Romo has workd very hard to be who he is but Cutler has talent like Troy Aikman and with his coach he could win more super bowls than anyone. Shanahan will always give his QB weapons and I would trust the judgement of mmike shanahan over jerrys when aquiring offensive weapons anyday of the week.
 

raichledog

Active Member
Messages
373
Reaction score
204
just ask yourselves, would you take any of them over Romo today? I honestly don't think there is one of them I would even consider ahead of Romo. That's not a knock on them, it's a statement to how great a player I think Romo is.
 

billknows

New Member
Messages
790
Reaction score
0
Scouts, Inc. apparently changed its mind since the season started. They had Romo ranked above all the quarterbacks on that list other than Big Ben entering the season. Perhaps they found some flaws in his back-to-back 300-yard performances.


hehehe
 

sago1

Active Member
Messages
7,791
Reaction score
0
Frankly I'd take Romo over any of those guys. How come we always hear the same old refrain whenever Cowboy QBs are discussed? Critics of our QBs have a history of always saying we had great talent on those teams & any decent NFL QB could have handled the starter job just as well as Aikman; now they say the same thing about Romo.

Well, it's kind of interesting how well Peyton Manning plays behind a good OL, with a good receiving core & quality WR in Marvin Harrison & a top RB like Addai & Edgerrin James before that. So I guess he's really not a HOF QB cause of all the talent around him. Same goes for other NFL QBs. Bradshaw shouldn't be in the HOF cause he had a great defense, a great OL, 2 great WRs & great RBs. To quote critics of our QBs, any decent NFL QB could have done the same thing with those Steeler teams that Bradshaw did. If Elway was so great, why couldn't he win the SB until he had Terrell Davis?

As for Romo's mechanics, back in January or so former QB Trent Dilfer of SB fame studied Romo's mechanics, etc. He stated he expected to see a train wreck as he got ready to look him over. Instead Dilfer said he found a QB with really good mechanics, great release & all the other intangibles. He also said that it's not the other players who make Romo look good but Romo makes those players around him look good. If I can still find it, I'll post website address for you all to check out. I think more of Dilfer's evaluation then some dumb so called sports experts.
 

masomenos

Less is more
Messages
5,983
Reaction score
33
MONT17;2269583 said:
Romo has workd very hard to be who he is but Cutler has talent like Troy Aikman and with his coach he could win more super bowls than anyone. Shanahan will always give his QB weapons and I would trust the judgement of mmike shanahan over jerrys when aquiring offensive weapons anyday of the week.

You mean like when Shannahan spent a third round pick on Maurice Clarrett? How about the first rounder on Ashley Lelie? 2nd round picks on Tatum Bell and Darius Watts? First rounder on Marcus Nash?

:confused:
 

Thomas82

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,418
Reaction score
3,239
Big Ben the NFL's heir apparent to Brady and Manning

By Scouts Inc.
ESPN.com

Updated: September 18, 2008
nfl_qb_580.jpg
Getty Images
Scouts Inc. ranks Big Ben No.1 in this group. How would you rank these five great young quarterbacks?




Tom Brady is out for the season with a knee injury, and Peyton Manning is not himself after missing the entire preseason with a knee problem of his own. So with the NFL's top two quarterbacks on the mend, which young signal-callers are poised to step into the void and take their games to the next level?

Scouts Inc.'s pro scouts debated that topic. They considered possibilities such as Green Bay's Aaron Rodgers, Cleveland's Derek Anderson and Buffalo's Trent Edwards. But the finalists had stronger résumés.

Our experts whittled the list down to five names: Denver's Jay Cutler, New York's Eli Manning, San Diego's Philip Rivers, Pittsburgh's Ben Roethlisberger and Dallas' Tony Romo. From there, they sat down at the Scouts Inc. roundtable and took a vote on the best quarterback in that group.

Manning and Roethlisberger won points with their Super Bowl rings, Cutler and Romo were lauded for their physical skills and Rivers got credit for playing in last season's AFC championship game with a torn ACL. All have been impressive through the first two weeks of this season. Each scout ranked the list from 1 to 5 -- with five points awarded for a first-place vote, four for second, three for third, two for fourth and one for fifth -- and in the end, Big Ben's combination of size, arm strength, leadership skills and other intangibles gave him the slight edge over Eli Manning.

Here's how each scout voted and the final tally for each young quarterback, followed by the discussion that surrounded the vote:


NFL's Top 5 Young QuarterbacksGreenHortonKiddKretzMollRibaryWilliamsonTotalRoethlisberger133112130Manning211431327Cutler342243420Romo525324219Rivers45455559




What is the most important factor when evaluating NFL quarterbacks?

Jeremy Green: It's something I like to call FBI: football intelligence. Physical tools are great, but the list of physically gifted first-round quarterbacks who have busted is almost endless. Too many quarterbacks are overloaded early, take too many hits or never are able to catch up to the speed of the game. The perfect NFL quarterback is made up of so many attributes, but check back in the history books at the teams that reached or won the big game. What you'll find are a slew of quarterbacks leading the way who weren't necessarily the most gifted, but who had the great football instincts to manage a team.

Gary Horton: The ability to read defenses and process information is the critical factor for success at this position in the NFL. Most guys have physical tools, including arm strength -- but the best quarterbacks have the ability to make the game slow down and make good decisions. This is a game of matchups and the ability to read the defense before the snap and recognize the best matchup, which could be the third or fourth option, is a big key to success at the quarterback position.

Keith Kidd: There's a laundry list of factors that scouts and coaches consider when evaluating quarterbacks at the pro level. Does he fit the system? Should the scheme be built around him? Which coaches has he played for and in what system does he currently play? But let's face it: At the end of the day, quarterbacks are judged on wins and production. In the NFL, it's the most demanding position by far. A quarterback has to be mentally tough, extremely smart, a leader by example and the hardest-working player on his team. Even with significant personnel input from the coaching staff and equal competition at the position, there's a lot of luck involved in picking the right guy. Make a mistake at the position, especially early in the draft, and it can set a franchise back for years.

Doug Kretz: The ability to learn an offense and read coverages is most important. Many physically talented quarterbacks have failed in the NFL because they couldn't handle the mental aspect of the game. If a quarterback can't learn an entire playbook, the coaches have to reduce the game plan to help eliminate mistakes, which makes it easier on defenses. Quarterbacks also must be able to recognize the coverage pre-snap and realize when the secondary is disguising its coverage.

Ken Moll: There are a bunch of factors when evaluating a quarterback, but for me accuracy has to be No. 1. Accuracy has lots to do with vision, patience, mechanics, arm strength and instincts. Weight transfer and the release point are often what affect accuracy. This part of quarterback play is often underestimated, and making targets adjust is very disruptive to the whole passing game. To me, a great signal-caller can throw the ball accurately when he has to improvise, because plays often break down in the NFL.

Tag Ribary: Accuracy is the most important factor. The ability to remain accurate regardless of the situation supersedes all the other factors such as arm strength, athletic ability etc. Every quarterback has a bad game now and then, but in the end accuracy leads to consistency, and accuracy is not a trait that can be easily developed.

Matt Williamson: There isn't just one, of course, but I'd say accuracy. It amazes me that some of the college kids with phenomenal blends of size, strength and athleticism get drafted so high when, quite simply, they can't put the ball where it needs to be. If a quarterback lacks at least adequate arm strength, or can't decipher coverages, or processes information too slowly, then all the accuracy in the world doesn't matter. But if my quarterback can have only one great asset, I want the guy who can put the ball exactly where his receiver wants it. Bill Walsh was a proponent of throwing the ball softly to ensure that it hits its intended target and is very catchable. Though he has the benefit of the best supporting cast and protection among this group, Romo is the most accurate passer of the bunch. He consistently puts the ball right on the money.

Which of these QBs would you want running your team right now?

Jeremy Green: For me, it came down to Roethlisberger or Manning. Why? Both have Super Bowl rings. I rank Roethlisberger first, though, because I believe the Steelers win because of him, while the Giants too often win despite Manning. Eli doesn't have Big Ben's proven track record over the long haul. I love the command Roethlisberger has over his offense. He's a leader on the field and a respected voice in the locker room. He's smart, mobile enough, has great size and a solid arm and shows excellent creativity and the ability to make all the throws. Total package. Roethlisberger is a winner whom any team could build around.

Gary Horton: I want Manning because he is the unquestioned leader of a good team in a pressure-cooker market. He has a calm demeanor that permeates to his teammates and he can follow a bad play with several good ones. His footwork is excellent and he can make every play necessary. Plus he has developed into a good decision-maker who, like his brother Peyton, can make good pre-snap adjustments. There doesn't seem to be a situation that is ever too big for him.

Keith Kidd: Without a doubt, it's Brady. But I can't have him, so I'll go with Manning over Cutler. Manning was simply amazing in the postseason, outplaying Jeff Garcia, Romo, Brett Favre and finally, in the Super Bowl, Brady. Manning is playing with a tremendous amount of confidence, and he's in the toughest market of any player on this list. I'm impressed by his arm strength and maneuverability in the pocket, but what I love most is his laid-back demeanor. He doesn't allow a bad play to affect his overall performance. When he's in rhythm with the offense, Manning is a big-time quarterback who puts a lot of pressure on opposing defenses.

Doug Kretz: I would want Roethlisberger because he finds a way to orchestrate a drive to win the game when it's needed. Plus, his determination translates to his teammates, and he wills them to win. All these quarterbacks have physical skills, but Roethlisberger does the best job of leading his team to victory.

Ken Moll: Big Ben is the guy I would want running the show. He is a big, strong quarterback who can make all the throws and takes care of the ball. He usually performs well in big games and rarely loses a contest for the Steelers. Roethlisberger is very accurate and is having an excellent season thus far with a QB rating of 136.3. For a big man, Roethlisberger can move or elude in the pocket and is tough to bring down, which enables him to improvise downfield. He has great vision and poise in the pocket, which allows him to be an excellent decision-maker. Most importantly, he has the best proven record over his five-year career compared to the rest of the group.

Tag Ribary: Manning is the guy I want from this list because he has made unbelievable progress. He can manipulate safeties and linebackers with his eyes. He is accurate and releases the ball with confidence. Plus, Manning has a strong arm with an efficient throwing motion. My quarterback needs to be smart, able to read coverage quickly and have some mobility in the pocket to avoid the rush. Manning can do all of these things effectively, and he now has a proven track record of playing well in the biggest of games -- which most of the players on this list have yet to prove. He may not be the best in each of these individual categories, but right now he is good enough in all of them.

Matt Williamson: Roethlisberger, and by a substantial margin. The other four are excellent young quarterbacks, but when comparing each player's overall body of work, none comes close to Roethlisberger's. He is the only one who has not only achieved, but sustained, excellence. And he continues to get better as Steelers coach Mike Tomlin puts more responsibility on his shoulders. He takes too many sacks -- and probably always will -- but by holding on to the ball Roethlisberger also converts downfield plays with astonishing frequency. At worst he ranks second, behind Cutler, in terms of physical abilities. In terms of playmaking skills, he's tops. Most impressive is Big Ben's winning percentage -- and his Super Bowl ring. More could be on the way.

Which has the single most impressive skill/strength?

Jeremy Green: Wow, this is hard. I love Big Ben's strength, Manning's ability to shake off adversity, Romo's improvisational skills and Rivers' gritty temperament. But above all, Cutler's quick release stands out. The guy just throws darts. I didn't notice it as much on last year's mediocre Broncos club, but after watching all five passers early this season, I can't get over the way Cutler zings it. He can make all the throws with excellent arm velocity. This sums it up best: He can fit passes into tight windows better than anyone on this list, and that's a must when facing the speed of today's NFL defenses.


Gary Horton: I love Manning's ballhandling skills. His mechanics are starting to look a lot like his big brother's. A lot of his big passing plays come off play-action, and he does a nice job of showing the defense the ball and then taking it back and hiding it, which freezes the defender and creates confusion. And because the fake is so good, a lot of times the defender bites on it and then cannot recover. Manning also pump-fakes after most play-action fakes, which gives the defender even more to worry about.

Keith Kidd: Cutler. He's one of the most impressive young quarterbacks to enter the league in a long time. Aside from WR Brandon Marshall, who were the proven playmakers in Denver's offense headed into the season? The uncertainty hasn't fazed Cutler, who already is making stars of his supporting cast. He is extremely smart and sees the whole field, and he has the arm strength and accuracy to make all the throws. Now in his third year, Cutler has reached a level at which he can execute anything in Mike Shanahan's playbook and lift a team onto his shoulders. The Broncos have found their franchise quarterback.

Doug Kretz: Cutler has incredible arm strength and accuracy when he has time to set his feet and step into his throws. He hits tight windows like no other quarterback when he is focused and screwed into the game. As he matures and learns to trust Shanahan's system more, he could easily end up being the top quarterback on this list.

Ken Moll: Cutler is the most gifted quarterback of this young group. He has an excellent combination of arm strength and accuracy. I don't have him higher in my rankings due to his minimal body of work in the league, but clearly he has outstanding talent, and it has shown in the early part of the season. When Cutler has time to set his feet and scan the field, he is the best of this bunch at getting the ball to his target.

Tag Ribary: When I watch Cutler throw the ball I am constantly amazed by his arm strength. The amount of zip he is able to put on the ball when throwing across the hash, on the move or when squeezing the ball into a window that is closing is uncanny. This gives defenders very little time to react once he makes a decision.

Matt Williamson: Arm strength may be the most overrated factor in quarterback evaluation, so I'm about to contradict myself a bit. But the revolutions Cutler puts on his fastball makes the jaw drop. Roethlisberger's overall strength has to be considered as well; he shrugs off 300-pound defensive linemen with relative ease. Both Cutler and Big Ben can throw strikes with excellent velocity, even when their feet aren't set. But the way Cutler slings it gives him a huge advantage because of the array of throws he's capable of. Shanahan has no play-calling limitations with Cutler behind center, and every defense he faces must defend the entire field. I want to see more, but Cutler has a very high ceiling.

Which has the most glaring weakness?

Jeremy Green: It would be easy to say Rivers' arm strength, but that arm did pass the Chargers into the AFC Championship Game. I won't make any fans in Dallas by saying this, but I'm going with Romo's inability to step up in the playoffs. Two years ago he fumbled the hold on a kick in Seattle. Last season, it was a fourth-quarter meltdown in which he spent more time yelling at officials and wasting time on the clock than running the offense. Romo is going to be special, and eventually could rank No. 1 on this list. But for now I have concerns about his temperament. His lack of maturity in the postseason has to change for the Cowboys to fulfill expectations in 2008.


Gary Horton: As much as you love the big-play ability of Romo, you also have to be aware of his tendency to turn the ball over due to his sloppy mechanics and poor decision-making at inopportune times. He is a Favre-like gunslinger, but he is prone to fumbles and he will force the ball into windows that close. Luckily for Romo, he has great skills and enough playmakers around him that he can usually overcome these mistakes with explosive positive plays -- but he cannot afford another big miscue come playoff time.

Keith Kidd: Tough question. This is a very impressive group, and no one takes this category in a landslide. But if I have to pick one, I'll say Romo. He's playing with the best supporting cast of any quarterback in this group, and until he can bag that first playoff win, I won't be fully convinced. On film, he just doesn't seem very mechanically sound. I know Cutler has yet to win in the playoffs, too. But based on their respective abilities, the comparison isn't even close.

Doug Kretz: Rivers has a couple of issues that are still holding him back, but they can be worked with. He has an unorthodox release and has a tendency to throw the ball when he's off-balance, which causes erratic throws. Long-time quarterbacks coach Ken Myers once told me when we were in Seattle that he won't change a quarterback from the waist up, but he will work with his footwork. If Rivers can learn to stay balanced and square up more often, his delivery would become more consistent.

Ken Moll: I believe Manning is a good football player, but he clearly has weaknesses with his accuracy and ability to improvise -- except for last year's Super Bowl play that will go down in infamy. He can slide and deliver the ball, but often is not very accurate. I'm not sure if he is trying to do too much or simply lacks great vision while improvising, but he has the worst completion percentage (54.9) and touchdown-to-interception ratio (80-65) of this group. He has improved in this phase of his game, but clearly over his career he has a glaring problem in this area.

Tag Ribary: I have some concerns about Rivers' mobility. Even before the knee injury, I wondered how long he could escape the rush or create with his legs if he had to. He does a good job making subtle adjustments in the pocket to buy some time, but once he is outside or forced to tuck the ball and run, I've thought he was susceptible.

Matt Williamson: It hasn't shown up much after just two games, but Cutler's decision-making was questionable last season. Manning's penchant for interceptions and Rivers' reactions to phantom pressure deserve mention, but Cutler's judgment has been too suspect not to choose. I love his confidence and brashness, but he threw some passes last year that no one had any business letting go. Again, we haven't seen much of it this season, but Cutler definitely has some Favre in him. The comparisons may not be entirely fair for either player, but they hold water. In this case, though, it's as much a criticism as it is a compliment.


Scouts Inc. watches games, breaks down film and studies football from all angles for ESPN.com.


__________________
 
Top