juckie;2186231 said:Out of all the cbs he seemed really on the ball and sharp and a good tackler.At least for the first game.Any thoughts?
juckie;2186231 said:Out of all the cbs he seemed really on the ball and sharp and a good tackler.At least for the first game.Any thoughts?
juckie;2186231 said:Out of all the cbs he seemed really on the ball and sharp and a good tackler.At least for the first game.Any thoughts?
Adam Jones looked like crap out there. The rust on this guy must be thicker than we thought. I hope he gets back to form but last night was not encouraging.BAT;2186314 said:Henry looked the sharpest of all the corners last night. Followed by Jenkins, then Scandrick.
Pacman & Ball were having a rough go. Oglesby & Brown were near invisible, as in nowhere near the ball.
Watkins did not look great either, but at least he was getting to the ballcarrier & helping on tackles.
newlander;2186511 said:I honestly didn't see the game, but I have thought all along that pac would be best utilized in the slot: I mean you guys never thought he'd be split wide on Burress or Philly's big WR's, etc....did you? IN my mind he's a slot CB, I.E. nickel back that can jam and run with smurfs like Randle-El of the foreskins, Smith of the Giants, etc....just a thought, but I really think that's how you'll see him used. He has physical limitations to playing out wide against big WRs IMO.