Hostile;1753733 said:
Of course I am, you invited me to.
Actually, I didn't. Some idiot did. But I do rather enjoy these verbal bouts.
Hostile;1753733 said:
You forget that already? That Sierra Vista fog has you all goofed up.
LMAO
Could be worse, I could have gone to school here. Sorry, I meant, gone to the pregnancy and drug clinic they call Buena HS.
Hostile;1753733 said:
So, what you are saying is you have no objection or comeback whatsoever for anyone who reminds you about 15 of the last 18 head to head games? You never once tried to remind anyone about just 2005 right?
2005 has nothing to do with it at this point though (but if they want to bring up 15 out of 18, I'll respond), the only thing that matters when talking head to head is the 2006 season now, where we split, each team taking the home game. Then, in the second game, the only game that will have mattered is week 11. In the NFL, it pays to have a short memory.
Hostile;1753733 said:
Come on man, don't try and con me.
If you say so. This isn't even interesting.
Ritalin works. Well it doesn't but worth a... oh look, a bird!
Hostile;1753733 said:
Sure. I'm not a dunce. Will you acknowledge that we were not in the NFL in 1937 and 1942 and that it had nothing whatsoever to do with the head to head rivalry?
Yes, but if you want to mention head-to-head rivalries, why bring up super bowls then? Or playoff wins/berths? None of that matters. The only thing that does matter is 55-36-2 and 2-0.
Hostile;1753733 said:
Better job of explaining it.
Let me put this to you this way. I don't care about that stat and not because of the fact it looks better for your team.
If you ask me if I would be okay with losing more Super Bowls if it meant we also were the first team to 6 or 7, I would tell you that I would be okay with that in a heartbeat. To me, that is the goal. To get there and then win it. To have the most.
I'm sure it is, so why mention playoff victories and super bowl appearance then? After all, you don't care, right?
Hostile;1753733 said:
It cracks me up that there are people who deny this is relevant. I hate the Yankees, but you know what? It matters that they have more World Series wins than any other team. I hate the Boston Celtics. Same thing. I am not a fans of the Montreal Canadiens. Same thing.
When the 49ers got to 5 before we did, it ate at me. It eats at me that they have never lost one. If I were a 49ers fan though I can promise you that I would lose 4 more if it meant I got 6 before anyone else. It eats at me that Pittsburgh has a 5th.
I take great joy in reminding Eagles fans that they have zero. You know what's funny? Skins fans do that too. I've seen it so many times over at ES. By doing that do you know what you are doing? Ignoring their 3 NFL CHampionships in 1948, 1949, and 1960. The same thing you gripe about me doing by ignoring 1937 and 1942.
It's just too fun to remind them of that! The only team that beats them for championship futility is the Cardinals, and of that I remind them constantly.
Hostile;1753733 said:
You know what the big difference is between you and me in doing that? My team wasn't in existence when those games were played but yours was.
Wasn't yours in existence in 60?
Hostile;1753733 said:
Not sure why this matters to you. Yes.
It doesn't, I just had to know if I was correct in adding (playoff) games to the total, so as not to redo all the work.
Hostile;1753733 said:
We didn't play you in the 1987 post season. So the claim you made never happened.
Can you acknowledge that?
You're right, never happened. I already said, you know what, I misread, and my fault. My bad. I'm sorry. Excuse my ineptitude. Pardon my bout of incompetence. Did I acknowledge this enough yet?