FA: Robinson vs. Nicks

Picksix

A Work in Progress
Messages
5,198
Reaction score
1,081
I know Stephen was quoted on his radio show, that we had the flexibility to do basically whatever we wanted in the offseason. But hypothetically, what if it came down to a choice between one or the other? Who do you take?

Personally, I take Nicks. I'm a big believer that it doesn't matter who you have at the skill position, if you don't have a good OL. JMHO.

I like Robinson, hope we can resign him. I know others have said he's easily the top priority in FA. I can only imagine the "passion" we'll see on this board if that doesn't happen. But to those who think Robinson is an absolute must, let me give an alternative perspective. SF had Josh Morgan earlier this year, who got hurt in his 5th game, knocking him out for the season. He was arguably developing into his team's top WR, even though he only score 1 TD. But Robinson's numbers in his first 5 games were roughly similar. He had 4 more catches, and about 100 more yards, but also had but 1 TD. Maybe Morgan blows up like LR did, maybe not. Regardless, the Niners have been okay since. The big differences - better OL and better defense (and possibly better coaching).

My point is, I really hope we can resign Robinson, but if we don't, I think we have enough to make up for his loss. We may need to bring in another TE or WR, but I don't think we need to make a huge investment in terms of money or draft picks to do it.

We absolutely must get better on the OL. I'd like to think that with a full offseason, the guys we have will get better. But I'm not as confident about those guys as I am about our young WR's (Radway, Holmes, Harris, etc)
 
Nicks easily. Robinson is a good player, but Nicks is a legit superstar besides we still have Dez and Miles so we can afford to lose Robinson.
 
Cowboys&LakersFan;4378697 said:
Nicks easily. Robinson is a good player, but Nicks is a legit superstar besides we still have Dez and Miles so we can afford to lose Robinson.


yeah, dallas doesn't need a third receiver, Dez and Austin are NEVER injured...:bang2:
 
Nicks. But, as you say, we'll get our own guys signed and still find an OG, CB, and pass rusher in free agency.
 
We have enough resources for both. It wont have to come to this.
 
this thread is ********...

Robinson is going to cost pennies in comparison to what Nicks is going to cost...for that reason alone, this thread is ********...
 
Nick by landslide. If you QB has no time then it wouldn't matter if you have two Jerry Rice running routes.

The bigger debate is WR Robinson vs CB (Carr) from KC or FS Griffin.

I think I take DB because our secondary is so atrocious.
 
i have a hard time giving a lot of money to a player that was a complete loser before last season.
 
MarionBarberThe4th;4378768 said:
Larry allen or peerless price?

you are never going to give Peerless a break..lol
 
Kind of a moot issue since we can do both and more.
 
GloryDaysRBack;4378737 said:
this thread is ********...

Robinson is going to cost pennies in comparison to what Nicks is going to cost...for that reason alone, this thread is ********...

Thanks as always for your objective input. And as I like to say, when it comes to ******** threads, you're the expert.
 
Picksix;4378829 said:
Thanks as always for your objective input. And as I like to say, when it comes to ******** threads, you're the expert.

dont be mad bro..

dumb thread, its all good
 
SDogo;4378736 said:
We have enough resources for both. It wont have to come to this.

So, if Nicks wants 6-7 million a year (what Evans got), and LR wants 5 million a year, we could do that? You would do that? Not implying, just asking.
 
GloryDaysRBack;4378737 said:
this thread is ********...

Robinson is going to cost pennies in comparison to what Nicks is going to cost...for that reason alone, this thread is ********...

It sort of depends on how ******** other teams are.

Nicks should cost a lot more than Robinson.

Nicks is an All-Pro OG who is young and durable.

Robinson is a frequently injured WR who has had one good season where most of his plays came from QB improvisation.

Nicks should be a $8M/yr player. Robinson should be a $3M/yr player.

The only question is if some WR hungry team wants to give Robinson a premium salary around $7M/yr. It that is the case we have to let him walk as we can't get into bidding wars for a #3 WR. It would also be grossly overpaying for a very unproven player - this is how we got stuck with Miles' contract. Let's not repeat that mistake again.
 
Cowboys&LakersFan;4378697 said:
Nicks easily. Robinson is a good player, but Nicks is a legit superstar besides we still have Dez and Miles so we can afford to lose Robinson.

:bow:
 
dboy214;4378751 said:
i have a hard time giving a lot of money to a player that was a complete loser before last season.


.....it's my SPECIALTY......especially if they have a star on their helmet...


sincerely, LIL' Dan Snyder



BTW: not totally joking here: Commanders need wr's badly...............
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,012
Messages
14,506,631
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top