Facing a Fangio type of defense every day will only help!

Cowboyny

Well-Known Member
Messages
24,294
Reaction score
29,068
I was listening to a Lamb locker room interview yesterday and he was talking about what a challenge facing this defensive scheme is. As we all remember, it was Fangio who found that blueprint how to slow down the Cowboys powerful passing attack while in Denver. Other teams adopted the same strategy with good success since. It forced Dak to stay patient and take what is given underneath or try to fit passes into tight windows which was high risk. Many remember a few years ago, Dak was really struggling protecting the football, this scheme was part of the reason.

Dak and the offense has gotten better facing this type of scheme, having a legitimate rushing attack has certainly helped. I read a few weeks ago, that the Cowboys saw the most shell coverage in the league last season. Makes sense how the run game thrived seeing a light box often. Facing this scheme will only make the offense better and more comfortable attacking it.
 
It's not like Dak has really struggled against Fangio.

The Denver game was just missing open throws, they had coverages beat but didn't execute. He was excellent against Philly in both games last year.

The Fangio defense works when there's a dynamic 4-man passrush - the disguises and things don't work against good protection.
 
Need to see wins.

Then we can give CP praise.

The team did not help Romo with that jacked up 3-4 scheme.
 
Dak will face the OPPOSITE and will throw the most INT's in NFL history
 
On the other hand CP defense shall not rate themselves high with all the picks from Dak and rest of the QBs , LOL - it’s going to be little tough in the no contact drills as Fangios scheme works better when DL pressures OL .
 
Bots can't really instigate stuff though.
Kinda scary thinking Coog might be a bot. First, it's 'Please give me your thoughts!' attacks on CowboysZone. Next. The Pentagon.

Where did I put my Terminator 2:Judgment Day gif??
 
Kinda scary thinking Coog might be a bot.
atmuvl.gif
 
I was listening to a Lamb locker room interview yesterday and he was talking about what a challenge facing this defensive scheme is. As we all remember, it was Fangio who found that blueprint how to slow down the Cowboys powerful passing attack while in Denver. Other teams adopted the same strategy with good success since. It forced Dak to stay patient and take what is given underneath or try to fit passes into tight windows which was high risk. Many remember a few years ago, Dak was really struggling protecting the football, this scheme was part of the reason.

Dak and the offense has gotten better facing this type of scheme, having a legitimate rushing attack has certainly helped. I read a few weeks ago, that the Cowboys saw the most shell coverage in the league last season. Makes sense how the run game thrived seeing a light box often. Facing this scheme will only make the offense better and more comfortable attacking it.
To Echo the great bill Parcells, lets put down the Anointing oils. Like another poster said it requires a good 4 man rush all be affective. we have Williams at DT who's decent at rushing the passer, EZ who could be good but its a wait and see. Lawrence who's an unknown, Gray is more of a run setting DE like DLaw, Williams and others that are Meh. The rest of the DTs are just Run defenders really, we traded the only dude that was semi good at rushing from inside in Osa.

I hate to be the dude that rains on people parade, but it could be an amazing year, or it could be we just gave NYJ a 10 ten pick. I need to see it in action consistently
 
It's not like Dak has really struggled against Fangio.

The Denver game was just missing open throws, they had coverages beat but didn't execute. He was excellent against Philly in both games last year.

The Fangio defense works when there's a dynamic 4-man passrush - the disguises and things don't work against good protection.
Yeah that’s a myth created amongst some fans that he struggles because of the Denver game. Surely didn’t have a issue last year.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
474,629
Messages
14,548,781
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top