fivetwos
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 22,982
- Reaction score
- 32,697
I haven't seen much made of the exact issue, here or anywhere.
Seems he was fully in play at 10, then the news came out and he has only dropped in the first round in the eyes of most as a result.
Either there is a back problem or there isn't.....and I can't see why it's either not a problem at all, or he hasn't dropped further.
I realize the lower the pick the lower the risk, but let's say we were picking 22nd. Would it be OK to waste a pick on a player with a bad back then??
Of course not, same with 44 IMO.
It's either a problem or it isn't the way I see it. I could be wrong...
Appreciate thoughts.....
Seems he was fully in play at 10, then the news came out and he has only dropped in the first round in the eyes of most as a result.
Either there is a back problem or there isn't.....and I can't see why it's either not a problem at all, or he hasn't dropped further.
I realize the lower the pick the lower the risk, but let's say we were picking 22nd. Would it be OK to waste a pick on a player with a bad back then??
Of course not, same with 44 IMO.
It's either a problem or it isn't the way I see it. I could be wrong...
Appreciate thoughts.....
