- Messages
- 62,299
- Reaction score
- 63,981
lol. Well, you got me there. However, what happens when a competitor, for example Michelin, offers a comparative offer? Both manufacturers offers cancel the other's. Product appeal shifts elsewhere to quality, warranty, etc. The deciding factor may eventually rest on something less tangible.Yea, right, .. when Firestone offers the "buy 3 tires, get one free" many guys won't do it just because of the "gamer" commercial.
lol. Well, you got me there. However, what happens when a competitor, for example Michelin, offers a comparative offer? Both manufacturers offers cancel the other's. Product appeal shifts elsewhere to quality, warranty, etc. The deciding factor may eventually rest on something less tangible.
Funny you mention that. The commercial's message was a little unsettling to me, so I immediately did an internet search to read what others thought. The whole thing is entirely unscientific, but I found most comments were negative in nature. Some thought the commercial was not funny at all and considered a retaliation scenario would be an appropriate follow-up commercial for Firestone. The positive comments for the commercial that I read thought the wife/girlfriend was completely vindicated in her action and did not deserve retaliation in any way, shape or form. The usual suggestion for retaliation was the husband/boyfriend to burn her shoes or something just as silly. What has fascinated me so far is that my poll has not attracted any positive votes for the commercial.I thought it was funny. If anyone did that to me, I'd immediately return the favor.
I thought it was funny. If anyone did that to me, I'd immediately return the favor.
Funny you mention that. The commercial's message was a little unsettling to me, so I immediately did an internet search to read what others thought. The whole thing is entirely unscientific, but I found most comments were negative in nature. Some thought the commercial was not funny at all and considered a retaliation scenario would be an appropriate follow-up commercial for Firestone. The positive comments for the commercial that I read thought the wife/girlfriend was completely vindicated in her action and did not deserve retaliation in any way, shape or form. The usual suggestion for retaliation was the husband/boyfriend to burn her shoes or something just as silly. What has fascinated me so far is that my poll has not attracted any positive votes for the commercial.
Do people really do stuff like that to each other?
I majored in marketing, so I often critique commercials more than I should. In my opinion, you are correct in your analysis. I would make this suggestion though. In commercials involving more than one demographic interacting with others, scan for instances where objects of significant value are destroyed to the detriment of a single party only. The key word is destroyed, not hidden or substituted for another object. I think you may find very few commercials of that nature on the boob tube.Chances are, Michelin is doing it too.
DE, .. watch commercials, and see if you notice that many, .. not all but many, have a woman making a guy look like a dork. Or the wife and kids making the Dad seem like a dork.
The guy always seems to be the foolish one or the dumb one in the commercial, .. or the butt of the joke.
See if you notice that going forward.
You would think so, but I always say the world is made up of lots of different personalities. You would be surprised just how serious some viewers reacted to the commercial.I voted positive because I thought it was funny so you should have seen at least 1 vote. You cannot take this stuff too seriously.
I majored in marketing, so I often critique commercials more than I should. In my opinion, you are correct in your analyis. I would make this suggestion though. In commercials involving more than one demographic interacting with others, scan for instances where objects of significant value are destroyed to the detriment of a single party only. The key word is destroyed, not hidden or substituted for another object. I think you may find very few commercials of that nature on the boob tube.
Think so? Please tell my wife! If necessary, I'll pay you.I would not know, I am sure you are right.
Chances are, Michelin is doing it too.
DE, .. watch commercials, and see if you notice that many, .. not all but many, have a woman making a guy look like a dork. Or the wife and kids making the Dad seem like a dork.
The guy always seems to be the foolish one or the dumb one in the commercial, .. or the butt of the joke.
See if you notice that going forward.
I've noticed big time. I can usually see "the joke" coming a mile away This commerical was no different. It's annoying.Chances are, Michelin is doing it too.
DE, .. watch commercials, and see if you notice that many, .. not all but many, have a woman making a guy look like a dork. Or the wife and kids making the Dad seem like a dork.
The guy always seems to be the foolish one or the dumb one in the commercial, .. or the butt of the joke.
See if you notice that going forward.
Think so? Please tell my wife! If necessary, I'll pay you.
I majored in marketing, so I often critique commercials more than I should. In my opinion, you are correct in your analysis. I would make this suggestion though. In commercials involving more than one demographic interacting with others, scan for instances where objects of significant value are destroyed to the detriment of a single party only. The key word is destroyed, not hidden or substituted for another object. I think you may find very few commercials of that nature on the boob tube.