Red Dragon
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,395
- Reaction score
- 3,773
The first Cowboys dynasty - which I am loosely defining as 1970-1982 - lasted a lot longer than the second, however, the second (1992-1995) was a lot more successful on a per-year basis.
75% of all seasons in the second dynasty ended in a championship, but the first dynasty saw the Cowboys appear in the NFC conference title game almost every year.
In short, the first dynasty was longer lasting, but had less hardware to show for it. The second was a lot shorter, but more dominant and title-winning. Which was more enjoyable in your opinion?
75% of all seasons in the second dynasty ended in a championship, but the first dynasty saw the Cowboys appear in the NFC conference title game almost every year.
In short, the first dynasty was longer lasting, but had less hardware to show for it. The second was a lot shorter, but more dominant and title-winning. Which was more enjoyable in your opinion?