CWR
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 24,671
- Reaction score
- 35,951
Fish is the biggest hack in sports media
According to Fish's board we had Slater 1st, if I'm not mistaken.
Fish is the biggest hack in sports media
I love your line, "they had Big red blinking CB on both of their foreheads". These clowns think they can outsmart people using their favorite toy, the media. The real, this team has so many needs that we were bound to land a player at a position of need if we stayed in the top 15 thats why you interview 20-30 potential draftees.Moving up for either corner would have been a massive mistake.
If the Corners were their main targets at 10, this front office did a disservice with all their talking pre draft. Both went before 10, but they had Big red blinking CB on both of their foreheads.
I want to believe they were ok with either CB at 10, but were playing other teams and were also trying to see if they could move back and add a pick. But then I realize who I am talking about.
So I am glad they didn't move up. We will see if they are right on Parsons. A few stud DT and a good safety and CB would help. This defense still needs a lot of help.
And people LOVED the move at the time.Yet they moved up much further to get Mo Clai.
I think Fish is wrong alot but on the Fan this morning he said that the efforts to move up to 6 was to be certain to get PARSON'S not the CBs
I know, but he's quoting Stephen........
But something's off ........we've heard Parson was their guy at 10. I suppose it could be he was their 3rd after Horn and/or Surtain. The only question, if you thought enough to of them to move to 6, then why not 7, 8, or 9?
Hmmm first time hearing this but read/heard more than a couple of times the Lions were very high on Parson
But some other teams had a higher value on those same CBs hence why they were gone. I am not sold Parsons is NFL ready he only has 2 years of free lancing LB on his resume.Moving up for either corner would have been a massive mistake.
If the Corners were their main targets at 10, this front office did a disservice with all their talking pre draft. Both went before 10, but they had Big red blinking CB on both of their foreheads.
I want to believe they were ok with either CB at 10, but were playing other teams and were also trying to see if they could move back and add a pick. But then I realize who I am talking about.
So I am glad they didn't move up. We will see if they are right on Parsons. A few stud DT and a good safety and CB would help. This defense still needs a lot of help.
They did their due diligence by making the phone call to ask. I doubt it got much further than that given the cost.
Not close. Fish bills himself as some uber insider connected with all the interior workings and thoughts of the franchise. Stephen A is paid to be a blowhard provocateur.Stephen A smith. Not even because of his hatred of the Cowboys.
What he said about Kawhi and Canada should have gotten him fired.
I know, but he's quoting Stephen........
But something's off ........we've heard Parson was their guy at 10. I suppose it could be he was their 3rd after Horn and/or Surtain. The only question, if you thought enough to of them to move to 6, then why not 7, 8, or 9?
I'd rather have Parsons than Surtain or Horn anyways. Plus we got a 3rd. Can't imagine giving up picks to get Surtain or Horn.