Fish: Klingsbury is "Auditioning" for Jerry

Hawkeye0202

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,986
Reaction score
47,154
It's Fish .......but I have read a couple of other nuggets Kingsbury would be high on Jerry's list to replace MM.

 

CowboyStar88

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,911
Reaction score
25,090
As long as you get a solid DC. Robert Saleh or Mike Vrabel (if he’s not a HC anywhere) would work. Or if we’re looking to promote from within Al Harris, but I have a feeling he goes off to DC with DQ after this season.
 

Hawkeye19

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,599
Reaction score
22,597
Not a fan. Would be an underwhelming hire to say the least.

I prefer someone from the Kyle Shanahan tree that will implement a modern run oriented scheme and actually commit to the ground attack.

Having a decent running game is the only possible way we can succeed with Dak at QB.

You are paying him crazy money, might as well surround him with the weapons you know he has to have to even have a small chance of success
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
101,399
Reaction score
111,115
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
"I think a lot of him, he’s a friend," Jones said of Kingsbury via 105.3 The Fan. "I think he’s done an outstanding job every place he’s been. I really think a lot of him and I think that he was ideal in working with the young quarterback.”
He is a former HC in this league and Jerry hiring him wouldn't surprise me at all.
 

Carson

Well-Known Member
Messages
37,859
Reaction score
66,656
I wouldn’t be mad at it. He’s had success with several quarterbacks and I like his offensive scheme.

In reality, these are the hires you need to all prepare yourself for.

-Former NFL coach
-Will accept a role for $4-$5 million a season.
-Won’t rock the boat at Jerry World
-OK with being Jerry’s yes man.

Eliminate the Belichick, Ben Johnson, Slowik etc

Itll be among the Kingsbury, Flores, Vrabel mold.
 

CTcowboy203

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,548
Reaction score
4,506
Not too enthusiastic about him. Rather Slowik or Johnson (who I don’t think will come here), prefer them off kingsbury
 

Carson

Well-Known Member
Messages
37,859
Reaction score
66,656
Not too enthusiastic about him. Rather Slowik or Johnson (who I don’t think will come here), prefer them off kingsbury
Slowik and Johnson aren’t real candidates here.

They will want to bring their guys and want $$$.

Kingsbury will be happy to be a head coach again
 

Bobhaze

Staff member
Messages
18,497
Reaction score
72,923
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
It's Fish .......but I have read a couple of other nuggets Kingsbury would be high on Jerry's list to replace MM.


I’m a big Texas Tech fan and have some strong opinions about Kliff. He’s a brilliant offensive mind but a lousy HC. Remember it was Kingsbury who recruited and developed Patrick Mahomes at Tech. Somehow with the great Mahomes on board, Tech only had a winning record once.

Don’t get me wrong, there’s a lot to like about Kingsbury, but some downers too.Here are the strengths and weaknesses Of KK as a head coach as I see it.
STRENGTHS
  • One of the most innovative in offensive scheme and play calling in football today.
  • Relates well to the players.
  • Hard working. A coach who lives and breathes in the film room.
  • Good judge of offensive talent.
  • Aggressive; not afraid to take chances.
  • Develops young QBs very well.
WEAKNESSES
  • His teams always start well, then fade.
  • His teams never seem to have a good defense. I can only surmise that he spends little time talking to his defensive coaches and players.
  • Not a great disciplinarian. His teams are usually high in number of penalties.
  • His personality is somewhat introverted. Doesn’t love talking to the press.
My final take on Kliff Kingsbury is he’s an offensive genius who is a great offensive coordinator but not a great head coach. IMO he’s best as an OC. Jerry would love that he doesn’t want a lot of media spotlight.
 

Carson

Well-Known Member
Messages
37,859
Reaction score
66,656
I’m a big Texas Tech fan and have some strong opinions about Kliff. He’s a brilliant offensive mind but a lousy HC. Remember it was Kingsbury who recruited and developed Patrick Mahomes at Tech. Somehow with the great Mahomes on board, Tech only had a winning record once.

Don’t get me wrong, there’s a lot to like about Kingsbury, but some downers too.Here are the strengths and weaknesses Of KK as a head coach as I see it.
STRENGTHS
  • One of the most innovative in offensive scheme and play calling in football today.
  • Relates well to the players.
  • Hard working. A coach who lives and breathes in the film room.
  • Good judge of offensive talent.
  • Aggressive; not afraid to take chances.
  • Develops young QBs very well.
WEAKNESSES
  • His teams always start well, then fade.
  • His teams never seem to have a good defense. I can only surmise that he spends little time talking to his defensive coaches and players.
  • Not a great disciplinarian. His teams are usually high in number of penalties.
  • His personality is somewhat introverted. Doesn’t seem that inspirational to players.
My final take on Kliff Kingsbury is he’s an offensive genius who is a great offensive coordinator but not a great head coach. IMO he’s best as an OC.
That’s why you bring in Saleh or Vrabel
 

CTcowboy203

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,548
Reaction score
4,506
Slowik and Johnson aren’t real candidates here.

They will want to bring their guys and want $$$.

Kingsbury will be happy to be a head coach again

I don’t agree about slowik and as much as I respect your opinion me and you really have no idea who is a “real” candidate here in terms of their interest. Disingenuous to say something so matter of factly, How would Slowik not want to at least interview?
 

lwehlers

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,622
Reaction score
2,723
I’m a big Texas Tech fan and have some strong opinions about Kliff. He’s a brilliant offensive mind but a lousy HC. Remember it was Kingsbury who recruited and developed Patrick Mahomes at Tech. Somehow with the great Mahomes on board, Tech only had a winning record once.

Don’t get me wrong, there’s a lot to like about Kingsbury, but some downers too.Here are the strengths and weaknesses Of KK as a head coach as I see it.
STRENGTHS
  • One of the most innovative in offensive scheme and play calling in football today.
  • Relates well to the players.
  • Hard working. A coach who lives and breathes in the film room.
  • Good judge of offensive talent.
  • Aggressive; not afraid to take chances.
  • Develops young QBs very well.
WEAKNESSES
  • His teams always start well, then fade.
  • His teams never seem to have a good defense. I can only surmise that he spends little time talking to his defensive coaches and players.
  • Not a great disciplinarian. His teams are usually high in number of penalties.
  • His personality is somewhat introverted. Doesn’t seem that inspirational to players.
My final take on Kliff Kingsbury is he’s an offensive genius who is a great offensive coordinator but not a great head coach. IMO he’s best as an OC.
kingsbury weakensses fit right in with what jerry jones wants for a headcoach. a coach that brings shinny fancy offense with no defense to compete in the playoffs. no way a defensive minded head coach even would want to coach this team.
 

CarolinaFathead

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,047
Reaction score
2,589
Meh…

This would be a very underwhelming hire and I wouldn’t be impressed, but that’s why Jerry would love him. Handing second chance opportunities to previously failed head coaches are absolute gold as a manipulative tool.
 

The Natural

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,158
Reaction score
18,881
There’s some ridiculous stat out there about this guy’s record in the second half of seasons compared to the first half. No thank you.
 
Top