You have not sidetracked the thread. Introduce quarterbacks into it and that might do the trick, lol.
@Diehardblues might disagree but I doubt he would argue the differing historical impact of the two events. One was a devastatingly tragic day in U.S. history. The other was significant in a professional sports team's history.
Both are not equivalence to each other in terms of overall importance but they are not required to be for any individual. Human beings think differently but there are life circumstances where people think similarly. Such is the case with negative events. The death of a loved one. The cancellation of a beloved television show. A divorce. Getting stranded on a deserted highway. A deadly tornado striking a community. Being stuck in an airport for days due to weather. There can be countless examples.
None of those examples are equivalent. The negative gulf between losing a spouse and having a car breakdown in the middle of nowhere is massive, like the width and depth of the Pacific Ocean. Even so, individuals can mentally perceived and record negative circumstances, despite the real margin of importance between any of them.
Personally, I put 9/11 along side December 7th. I have made threads and posts on this site concerning both. November 17, 1985 means nothing to some Cowboys fans who were old enough at the time. understood the game of football and watched Dallas play that day.
There is zero comparison of importance between two of the most tragic days in American history and that fall day. However, I can remember what I was doing and where I was at that day over 38 years ago--when the Bears beat the Cowboys like a redheaded stepchild. It was one of the worst games I have witnessed in nearly 50 years following the team. And it was one of my worst days as a fan.
I think that is where Diehardblues is coming from. That said, I could be wrong, lol.