Football Outsiders ♥'s Dallas Cowboys receivers

03EBZ06

Need2Speed
Messages
7,984
Reaction score
411
FootballOutsiders.com, Updated 10 hours ago

Separating the performance of a group of receivers from the quarterback, offensive line and scheme inextricably attached to it is a difficult task. For every wide-open completion between Peyton Manning and Marvin Harrison, how can we give credit to Manning for his laser, rocket arm and ignore the artistry of Harrison's routes?

While Football Outsiders is known for trafficking in statistics and data, the solution here is to watch as much as possible and notice the subtleties of how receivers play. Do they run out their routes every time, even if they're the third or fourth option? Are they unable to adapt when they get bumped on the line? Do they block well? Do they sell their routes well enough to create space? And, of course, after getting open and shouting the quarterback's name as loud as possible like you did when you were eight, do NFL receivers do what they're paid to do: catch the ball?

Taking all these things into account and combining them with the statistical toolbox we employ, we've ranked the receiving corps of all 32 NFL teams, accounting for both their wide receivers and tight ends. Remember that we're grading the performance and talent of a group of receivers, not a team's passing attack.

While we'll be taking previous performance into account, players aren't static; some of the players who played well in 2006 may not have a job come 2008. While that can be due to age (see: Smith, Rod), some players who seemed promising can be out of a job as soon as they seemed to have one; ask Zach Hilton or Doug Gabriel about their 2006 seasons sometime. We'll be accounting for age and normal development trends in determining how these receiver groups sort out for 2007. The numbers in parentheses represent our ranks for each team a year ago.

For an explanation on the tools used to determine the rankings, check out the sidebar.

After all that, who's No. 1 at receiver? Surprisingly, it's the same team that we ranked No. 1 last year.

1. Dallas (1)
After six weeks of Drew Bledsoe, the Cowboys' receivers were struggling. While Terry Glenn had a very respectable 16.8 percent DVOA, Terrell Owens was at a woeful -7.7 percent, and Patrick Crayton (the likely third or fourth target on most plays) had only been thrown 12 passes in six weeks because Bledsoe couldn't stay upright long enough to find him. Even Jason Witten's 17.0 percent DVOA had him at a mediocre 13th amongst tight ends.

By the end of the year, Glenn's DVOA had improved to 20.4 percent, while Owens got all the way up to 12.2 percent. Crayton got 36 more attempts in the final 10 games and was the best third receiver in football. Witten's DVOA went up to 19.1 percent, seventh amongst all tight ends. The point: Having an even competent quarterback can be the difference between a group of receivers struggling, or being amongst the league's elite. While Owens and Glenn are getting up there in age, both have yet to show an appreciable level of decline in their metrics, and Owens will likely see an improved catch rate after healing his finger injury. Crayton remains one of the unsung threats in the league, and Witten, the best tight end in a division full of them. A team's top four receivers will see 65-70 percent of all the throws made by a quarterback over the course of a season; one through four, no one's better than the Cowboys.

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/7033282
 

bobtheflob

New Member
Messages
1,768
Reaction score
0
I know I'm probably biased because this ranks the Cowboys so high, but I think their analysis made more sense than what we've been getting from those Scouts, Inc. positional rankings.
 

Vintage

The Cult of Jib
Messages
16,714
Reaction score
4,888
bobtheflob;1554339 said:
I know I'm probably biased because this ranks the Cowboys so high, but I think their analysis made more sense than what we've been getting from those Scouts, Inc. positional rankings.

One looks at production (this).

One looks at talent (Scout)
 

superpunk

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,330
Reaction score
75
Some other fine clippings...

22. Washington (13)


If you could have given us our pick of every wide receiver who was acquired through trade or as a free agent following 2005, the last two guys we would have chosen would have been Brandon Lloyd (-16.9 percent DVOA, good for 82nd in the league in 2005) and Antwaan Randle El (-15.1 percent DVOA, 77th in 2005). Shockingly, they did not get better upon arriving in Washington. While Randle El is at least an excellent return man, Lloyd is a locker room malcontent and a possession receiver with the skill-set of a CBA-level rapper; namely, he's tall-ish. Lloyd and Randle El were both awful last year, and there's no reason to think they'll be good in the future.

This should not reflect poorly on Santana Moss or Chris Cooley, both of whom were very good in 2006. Unfortunately for Moss, the lack of concern defenses needed to push toward the other wideouts meant he was double-covered more often than not; merely having an average receiver across from him would free up space for the long game to develop. By the time Washington realizes it, though, Moss' peak as a small, speedy receiver might be past.

18. New York Giants (15)

There is a box exactly one foot over Plaxico Burress' head that Eli Manning consistently aims to hit. We can't award that box credit for being an intended receiver, so we give the targets to Burress instead. That means he only catches 50 percent or so of the passes thrown in his direction on a yearly basis, and it gives him a poor DVOA (1.3 percent, 44th in the league). Realistically, Burress is a No. 2 receiver miscast as a No. 1. The Giants would benefit greatly from a reliable possession receiver across from Burress (Darrell Jackson would have been a great fit here), and with Amani Toomer's decline and serious knee injury in 2006, the mantle will fall to second-round picks Steve Smith (forever to be known as "The Other...") and Sinorice Moss, the latter of which forgot to show up in 2006. Jeremy Shockey remains a good, but not great tight end because of the 10-15 passes he drops each year. If everything went right for this group, they could put up a giant year; unfortunately, things almost never go that way.
 

bobtheflob

New Member
Messages
1,768
Reaction score
0
Vintage;1554347 said:
One looks at production (this).

One looks at talent (Scout)

But sometimes it seemed like Scout was looking at just the previous year and sometimes at a player's career. They also seemed to take depth into account for some teams and not others. It just hasn't been that consistent.
 
Messages
27,093
Reaction score
0
Well I would rate Dallas in the top 5 regardless of what criteria being used because T.O., Glenn and Crayton are nightmares for defenses and you add two young TE's like Witten and Fasano you have something special there...
 

03EBZ06

Need2Speed
Messages
7,984
Reaction score
411
trickblue;1554439 said:
I do what I can to keep you guys entertained... ;)
I thought it was done by WG, kind of a thing females would do, no offense intended toward WG.;)
 

trickblue

Not Old School...Old Testament...
Messages
31,439
Reaction score
3,961
03EBZ06;1554444 said:
I thought it was done by WG, kind of a thing females would do, no offense intended toward WG.;)

http://img.***BLOCKED***/albums/v628/cowboyszone/thread_stuff/zax_not_funny.jpg
 

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,281
Reaction score
45,652
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
03EBZ06;1554444 said:
I thought it was done by WG, kind of a thing females would do, no offense intended toward WG.;)
Of all the cute mods on staff, I probably rank next to last. I just can't beat out Brain in the cheerleading outfit.
 

Future

Intramural Legend
Messages
27,566
Reaction score
14,714
ThreeSportStar80;1554402 said:
Well I would rate Dallas in the top 5 regardless of what criteria being used because T.O., Glenn and Crayton are nightmares for defenses and you add two young TE's like Witten and Fasano you have something special there...

Agreed, I can't think of a team with a better WR/TE combo than we have. Most teams with good WR's are weak at TE (Cincinatti) while teams with good TEs seem to be weaker at WR (San Diego).

The only teams I can think of with as good of balance are the Colts, and *ducking* Giants. If Shockey catches the ball on the few times it gets thrown to him, and Plaxico plays hard, they have a dangerous group. Say what you will about Shockey but he is very difficult to match up against.
 

gazmc_06

New Member
Messages
1,007
Reaction score
0
^agreed, Shockey is a great player. we have an awesome group though, T.O., Glenn, Crayton and Witten are pretty much unplayable. how do you defend that? you can't double up on T.O. because that leaves the other guy's more open, but if you play single coverage you will get burned *cough-Hall-cough*.
 

Future

Intramural Legend
Messages
27,566
Reaction score
14,714
CrazyCowboy;1554992 said:
I agree with this ranking, however I am called a Cowboy Homer sometimes.

no, no...alltimes :laugh2:
 

Clove

Shrinkage
Messages
64,894
Reaction score
27,491
gazmc_06;1554855 said:
^agreed, Shockey is a great player. we have an awesome group though, T.O., Glenn, Crayton and Witten are pretty much unplayable. how do you defend that? you can't double up on T.O. because that leaves the other guy's more open, but if you play single coverage you will get burned *cough-Hall-cough*.
If we can some how find a way to utilize Julius Jones in the passing attack, and Flozell can stop letting speed ends punk him, then we could possibly be unstoppable.
 
Top