For those who blame injuries

TheHerd

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,543
Reaction score
15,007
starters are starters for a reason because they are the best players on the team. Some fans were trying to use Baily as an ecuse last week .... The Eagles did it without a dam kicker and just went for 2 pts . The next man up is just as important as the man in front of him . If you need All Pros in all postions .... maybe the team <coaching> is not as good as they thought.

This staff and all the game plans are designed to win old school and to simply beat your man. I feel like Red thinks it's an affront and cheapens the game to actually out scheme another team. Like if you can't beat them play FOOTBALL, it's not really a victory. Can you imagine Red going for 2 because the kicker isn't available? Not a chance, 2 pt conversions are gimmick college plays.
 

GreenMean69

Well-Known Member
Messages
646
Reaction score
382
This staff and all the game plans are designed to win old school and to simply beat your man. I feel like Red thinks it's an affront and cheapens the game to actually out scheme another team. Like if you can't beat them play FOOTBALL, it's not really a victory. Can you imagine Red going for 2 because the kicker isn't available? Not a chance, 2 pt conversions are gimmick college plays.

This is brought up on EMB too

The talent is there , but it seems like the coaches are holding the team back . They did do a good job at protecting Dak for most part . Its hard when you have a team like the eagles front 7 this year. ITs like they are trying to fit a square peg in a round hole .
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
84,032
Reaction score
76,732
They didn't get better last season without Romo. They would have pretty easily beat the Packers in the playoffs with Romo.
They got better. Let's don't kid ourselves here. Dak's performance was better than anything I've seen from Romo in the playoffs...not only that but Dak was durable. Romo was a hit away.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
84,032
Reaction score
76,732
Fine. You won't get an argument from me that Jones is part of the problem but he's not changing. So at the very least, change the head coach and maybe we get lucky.
Yeah...your better than me. I've given up hope. As long as Jerry is involved this is what we will get. His presence on this team just does more damage then good. This team never gets a off day. They get the best of every team they face. Now he's effecting how our games are being called.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
84,032
Reaction score
76,732
You always have caveats. You said if Cox got hurt it would change how they do things. Well, they lost Cox for two games and their defense was still very decent and they went 2-0.

Largely because they have better coaching than we do as well as better depth.
Largely because they played trash teams....we played the Packers, Rams and Eagirls and you think that's equivalent to the Chargers and Cardinals?
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,835
Reaction score
103,565
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Largely because they played trash teams....we played the Packers, Rams and Eagirls and you think that's equivalent to the Chargers and Cardinals?

You'll get to see how good those Chargers are soon enough.
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,835
Reaction score
103,565
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
They are trash like we are. I don't have to wait for me to know that.

"Trash" doesn't throttle a team and score 54 points.

In fact, we get throttled by lobsided scores like that.

After a terrible start, that team is starting to get things together, unlike in Dallas where the wheels are falling off.
 

StarOfGlory

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,637
Reaction score
4,943
And none of the Philly's players you mentioned are considered the best at their position in the NFL. Dallas is down 3 players that are considered by many as the #1 players in the NFL at their respective position. Not making excuses for Dallas but the drop off is significant.
Peters is considered one of the best LT's in the NFL. Jordan Hicks might be the best cover LB in the NFL, as noted by former players. The drop from Sproles to Barner on ST's is huge. Enough of the ******** that "we lost 3 top players at their position." If you had competent backups and decent players surrounding those "3 best players" we wouldn't be in this position.

Vikings are on their 3rd QB. Commanders are missing half a team. Patriots always deal with injuries. Pats and Vikes made sure those losses didn't hurt by having innovative coaching and NFL-level reserves, as well as actual NFL players starting in other positions. Eagles lose Jordan Hicks, but since they have other good LB's like Kendricks and Bradham, it doesn't hurt them as much, unlike some of the slop we put out there. Their backup LT makes ours look like swiss cheese, so again they can withstand the loss better than us. Those DB's who are JAG's and low would picks for the most part look a lot better than ours, although they not have more talent. Why? Because they coach these players to be ready. I don't know what we do.

Look at their defense in the second half. Why did they get so much pressure on Dak in the second half? Because their coaches adjusted by shifting the focus of attack against our o-line. Their LB's started to sweep out wider, knowing that Dak would be flushed because their line is good enough to hold the one-tech while smashing the 3 and 5, forcing Dak to run for his life---where he would ofter find a speedy, competent Eagle LB waiting to turn him back. They attacked 3 and 5 tech, had pursuing LB's at the second level, and Garrett looked lost, just watching his o-line get the crap beat out of them---sometimes by all Eagle backups---because they put real NFL players to pick up the slack when, or if, starters get hurt. Case in point this year is Cox missing a few games and Allen stepping up.

We didn't lose because we didn't have Zeke, Lee, or Smith, but we lost because we had nothing as good as the Eagles besides those three to man up and take over. Add in our coaching staff from 20 years ago, and we have what we have.

The Vikings are 7-2 with Case Freaking Keenum. The Eagles are 9-1 without three key players. Those two teams prepared; ours did not.
 

mcmvp

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,366
Reaction score
2,342
You always have caveats. You said if Cox got hurt it would change how they do things. Well, they lost Cox for two games and their defense was still very decent and they went 2-0.

Largely because they have better coaching than we do as well as better depth.

Skip Bayless disease...I wouldn’t wish it on anyone
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
84,032
Reaction score
76,732
"Trash" doesn't throttle a team and score 54 points.

In fact, we get throttled by lobsided scores like that.

After a terrible start, that team is starting to get things together, unlike in Dallas where the wheels are falling off.
So the Chargers are a contender? Either way.......when the Eagirls played them they suck.
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,835
Reaction score
103,565
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
So the Chargers are a contender? Either way.......when the Eagirls played them they suck.

They're closer than the Cowboys are. They're getting it together while the Cowboys are falling apart.

But being "contenders" has nothing to do with it. They're playing well now and the Cowboys are playing like trash.
 
Top