FoxSports Czar: Cutting Pacman was easy; T.O. decision is tough

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,281
Reaction score
45,652
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
by John Czarnecki

John Czarnecki has been the editorial consultant for FOX NFL Sunday since its 1994 inception. This season marks Czarnecki's 30th year covering the NFL. He is one of 44 selectors to the Pro Football Hall of Fame.

Updated: February 10, 2009, 1:59 PM EST

OK, the Cowboys saved $1 million by releasing cornerback Pacman Jones. But the money is chump change when compared to the bigger locker-room issues still facing this franchise, ones that owner Jerry Jones has chosen to ignore for the time being. Everyone knew Pacman was expendable; what everyone wants to know is if Terrell Owens will join him?

Getting rid of T.O. has been the battle cry of many, believing that his disruptive style doesn't sit well with quarterback Tony Romo and offensive coordinator Jason Garrett. But I don't see Jones bowing to Romo until he wins a Super Bowl. The bottom line is Jerry has more concerns about Romo's abilities as a quarterback than he does about T.O.'s finger-pointing. This doesn't mean that the Dallas locker room doesn't remain a toxic environment, but Jones doesn't want to discard important players when the Cowboys still can't win a playoff game.

Or not even make the playoffs, as the case may be.

There were some who hoped that former Cowboys player and coach Dan Reeves would start cleaning up the mess. It was a novel move by Jones to hire Reeves and have him advise Wade Phillips on how to be a head coach while also tinkering with Garrett's offensive design. Reeves was actually at work for a couple days when Jones inserted a contract clause forcing Reeves to punch a time clock. True to his character, Reeves said no thank you.

So much for Reeves cleaning up the mess.

It's almost like Jerry had to invent something ridiculous in order to get Reeves to take a hike because it was a good bet that Reeves would eventually view T.O. as toxic, too. Yes, Reeves has loosened up in his old age, but we know he still sees football as a team game, not one dictated to by a bunch of selfish wide receivers.

Receivers can be a scary bunch. Roy Williams, who was removed from winless Detroit at a hefty cost in draft choices and $26.6 million guaranteed, has followed Owens' lead in complaining about Romo and Garrett. He blames them for his shoddy performance down the stretch for the Cowboys while everyone was giving him a poor performance pass because of plantar fasciitis in his foot. Williams couched his criticism while admitting he actually likes Garrett. How that works is anyone's guess.

The Cowboys' world remains a revolving one. It is too early for absolutes. My guess is that the status quo remains until training camp opens. By then, Pacman will probably find a new NFL home, too.

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/9202872/Cutting-Pacman-was-easy;-T.O.-decision-is-tough
 

ddh33

Active Member
Messages
4,934
Reaction score
2
I've got news for the Czar, even if Romo had a couple of Super Bowl rings, Jerry still might not listen. He didn't listen to Troy Aikman when it came to a flashy, controversial player. Why would he listen to Tony Romo?
 

bouttime

Member
Messages
102
Reaction score
9
When did Troy Aikman, become a "flashy, controversal player." ?? From what I remember, he was the main vocal when it came to Switzers lack of toughness at Training Camp and at practices.
 

jterrell

Penguinite
Messages
33,874
Reaction score
15,971
bouttime;2632616 said:
When did Troy Aikman, become a "flashy, controversal player." ?? From what I remember, he was the main vocal when it came to Switzers lack of toughness at Training Camp and at practices.

he's referring to aikman speaking about deion.
 

ravidubey

Active Member
Messages
4,879
Reaction score
20
WoodysGirl;2632434 said:
The Cowboys' world remains a revolving one.

The author has little concept of what the "Cowboys' world" really is because he isn't part of the Cowboy organization and likely only gets filtered responses, largely from players with agendas or players who might be sources who are on the periphery of what's going on.

What we have now are any number of media outlets vying for who defines the perception of the "Cowboys' world". The reporters who manage to do that will have their writing dance card filled for the entire offseason.

T.O. is too shiny a target to not write about, when his attitude represents a mere fraction of what's wrong with the Cowboys.
 

Chocolate Lab

Run-loving Dino
Messages
37,114
Reaction score
11,463
Getting rid of T.O. has been the battle cry of many, believing that his disruptive style doesn't sit well with quarterback Tony Romo and offensive coordinator Jason Garrett. But I don't see Jones bowing to Romo until he wins a Super Bowl. The bottom line is Jerry has more concerns about Romo's abilities as a quarterback than he does about T.O.'s finger-pointing. This doesn't mean that the Dallas locker room doesn't remain a toxic environment, but Jones doesn't want to discard important players when the Cowboys still can't win a playoff game.

I fear the Czar is correct. :(
 

wileedog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,356
Reaction score
2,393
ravidubey;2632705 said:
T.O. is too shiny a target to not write about, when his attitude represents a mere fraction of what's wrong with the Cowboys.

Its a fraction, but not a mere one.
 

JPM

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,301
Reaction score
1,236
bouttime;2632616 said:
When did Troy Aikman, become a "flashy, controversal player." ?? From what I remember, he was the main vocal when it came to Switzers lack of toughness at Training Camp and at practices.
And Chan Gailey.
 

Iago33

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,540
Reaction score
1,376
I always think it's strange when a reporter tells you what someone is thinking. If Jones hasn't told him these things, he is only speculating.
 

dbair1967

Arch Defender
Messages
30,782
Reaction score
1
If a repost feel free to move or delete:

Cutting Pacman was easy; T.O. decision is toughby John Czarnecki

OK, the Cowboys saved $1 million by releasing cornerback Pacman Jones. But the money is chump change when compared to the bigger locker-room issues still facing this franchise, ones that owner Jerry Jones has chosen to ignore for the time being. Everyone knew Pacman was expendable; what everyone wants to know is if Terrell Owens will join him?

Getting rid of T.O. has been the battle cry of many, believing that his disruptive style doesn't sit well with quarterback Tony Romo and offensive coordinator Jason Garrett. But I don't see Jones bowing to Romo until he wins a Super Bowl. The bottom line is Jerry has more concerns about Romo's abilities as a quarterback than he does about T.O.'s finger-pointing. This doesn't mean that the Dallas locker room doesn't remain a toxic environment, but Jones doesn't want to discard important players when the Cowboys still can't win a playoff game.

Or not even make the playoffs, as the case may be.

There were some who hoped that former Cowboys player and coach Dan Reeves would start cleaning up the mess. It was a novel move by Jones to hire Reeves and have him advise Wade Phillips on how to be a head coach while also tinkering with Garrett's offensive design. Reeves was actually at work for a couple days when Jones inserted a contract clause forcing Reeves to punch a time clock. True to his character, Reeves said no thank you.

So much for Reeves cleaning up the mess.

It's almost like Jerry had to invent something ridiculous in order to get Reeves to take a hike because it was a good bet that Reeves would eventually view T.O. as toxic, too. Yes, Reeves has loosened up in his old age, but we know he still sees football as a team game, not one dictated to by a bunch of selfish wide receivers.

Receivers can be a scary bunch. Roy Williams, who was removed from winless Detroit at a hefty cost in draft choices and $26.6 million guaranteed, has followed Owens' lead in complaining about Romo and Garrett. He blames them for his shoddy performance down the stretch for the Cowboys while everyone was giving him a poor performance pass because of plantar fasciitis in his foot. Williams couched his criticism while admitting he actually likes Garrett. How that works is anyone's guess.

The Cowboys' world remains a revolving one. It is too early for absolutes. My guess is that the status quo remains until training camp opens. By then, Pacman will probably find a new NFL home, too.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
I don't know how much inside info Czarnecki has I do know when Romo was asked he has said he has no problem with TO but Czarnecki says Romo does who is telling the truth? I think TO can be a handful although I think many WR tend to be a handful these days. I think for the staff they have the weigh the pros and cons before releasing a guy who in 3 years has produced 235 catches 3 1,000 yard receiving season with 3,587 yards and 38 TD's
 

Ben Roflsberger

New Member
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
The bottom line is Jerry has more concerns about Romo's abilities as a quarterback than he does about T.O.'s finger-pointing.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
Ben Roflsberger;2641287 said:
The bottom line is Jerry has more concerns about Romo's abilities as a quarterback than he does about T.O.'s finger-pointing.

And you know this how? because the artical said so or Jerry said so?
 

Ben Roflsberger

New Member
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
Doomsday101;2641288 said:
And you know this how? because the artical said so or Jerry said so?
]

Because as a fan i thought the same thing going into every game last year. Romo was very inconsistent, you dont know which quarterback your gonna get. you cant tell me that if you are an owner of a team and you just spent a ****load of money on an undrafted quarterback who had a couple of good seasons yet blew it when its comes to crunch time that you wouldnt be thinking well maybe this guy isnt the real deal.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
Ben Roflsberger;2641293 said:
]

Because as a fan i thought the same thing going into every game last year. Romo was very inconsistent, you dont know which quarterback your gonna get. you cant tell me that if you are an owner of a team and you just spent a ****load of money on an undrafted quarterback who had a couple of good seasons yet blew it when its comes to crunch time that you wouldnt be thinking well maybe this guy isnt the real deal.Jerry had a front row view for all of those fumbles and interceptions.

So in other words you know how you feel but you don't know how Jerry feels?

Romo is also the guy who put up 26 TD despite missing some game which put him in the top 6 or the guy who was hitting 61.5 precent of his passes.

As for blowing it in crunch time he is not a one man show and if you watched the game there were several players who did not do their job, it is damn tough to throw the ball when you have defenders breaking free. Romo shares in the blame but to act like somehow it is all the QB is downright ludicrous
 

JimDandy

New Member
Messages
166
Reaction score
0
Cut TO. We don't need the drama of his antics, nor do we need the drama of the speculation in cutting his disruptive hindquarters. He's a two time team cancer. Enough already.
 

wileedog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,356
Reaction score
2,393
Ben Roflsberger;2641293 said:
]

Because as a fan i thought the same thing going into every game last year. Romo was very inconsistent, you dont know which quarterback your gonna get. you cant tell me that if you are an owner of a team and you just spent a ****load of money on an undrafted quarterback who had a couple of good seasons yet blew it when its comes to crunch time that you wouldnt be thinking well maybe this guy isnt the real deal.

I think I would spend more time worrying about my $100M offensive line and $3M OC/HC of the Future who were getting my $67M QB killed than I would about a guy who has thrown 81 TDs in two and a half seasons.

He didn't have a "a couple good seasons" - he had the one the best 2 year periods of any QB in the league. But when he is basically running for his life on every snap down the stretch what do you expect to happen?

Yeah yeah December blah blah. I can point to plenty of plays that could have been made on defensive or by recievers that could have changed all of that. Romo didn't give up back to back 70 yd TD runs, Jerry's $40M safety did.

Fix the other stuff and get a competant coaching staff and Romo is the least of this team's worries.
 
Top