Frank Coyle, Draft Insiders Digest Top 50 overall 1/13/16

[Risen Star]

Got an email from Frank pimping his stuff for this year and he included a current top 50 overall. Just another informed opinion to add to the mix.

1. Joey Bosa DE Ohio St.
2. Laremy Tunsil T Mississippi
3. Jared Goff QB California
4. Paxton Lynch QB Memphis
5. Ronnie Stanley T Notre Dame

6. Jalen Ramsey CB Florida St.
7. Laquon Treadwell WR Mississippi
8. Robert Nkemdiche DT Mississippi
9. DeForest Buckner DE Oregon
10. Ezekiel Elliott RB Ohio St.

11. Shaq Lawson DE Clemson
12. Tre'Davious White CB LSU
13. Myles Jack ILB UCLA
14. A'Shawn Robinson DT Alabama
15. Taylor Decker T Ohio St.

16. Mackenzie Alexander CB Clemson
17. Jack Conklin T Michigan St.
18. Leonard Floyd OLB Georgia
19. Vernon Hargreaves CB Florida
20. Shon Coleman T Auburn

21. Will Fuller WR Notre Dame
22. Reggie Ragland ILB Alabama
23. Corey Coleman WR Baylor
24. Kenny Clark DT UCLA
25. Andrew Billings DT Baylor

26. Carson Wentz QB North Dakota St.
27. Jarran Reed DT Alabama
28. Jaylon Smith OLB Notre Dame
29. Emmanuel Ogbah DE Oklahoma St.
30. Connor Cook QB Michigan St.

31. Eli Apple CB Ohio St.
32. Su'a Cravens OLB USC
33. Germaine Ifedi T Texas A&M
34. Michael Thomas WR Ohio St.
35. Darron Lee OLB Ohio St.

36. Derrick Henry RB Alabama
37. Josh Doctson WR TCU
38. Jeremy Cash S Duke
39. Tyler Boyd WR Pittsburgh
40. Christian Heckenberg QB Penn St.

41. Shilique Calhoun DE Michigan St.
42. Jason Spriggs T Indiana
43. Jonathan Bullard DE Florida
44. Jordan Howard RB Indiana
45. Austin Johnson DT Penn St.

46. Vadal Alexander G LSU
47. OJ Howard TE Alabama
48. Jordan Jenkins OLB Georgia
49. Adolphus Washington DT Ohio St.
50. Shawn Oakman DE Baylor

 

[reddyuta]

seems about right for hargreaves.i was hoping we can get fuller with our 2nd pick.

 

[gmoney112]

A few interesting takes there. I think Tunsil, right now, is by far the #1 prospect. Bosa terrifies me.

Also interesting that Buckner is rated that high and Washington that low.

I think Henry is incredibly overrated. But that's just me.

seems about right for hargreaves.i was hoping we can get fuller with our 2nd pick.

That'd be a steal as of right now. There's no way of knowing what will happen between now and the draft. I really want to get QB, RB and defense in this draft, but I wouldn't hate taking a receiver if he's BPA.

 

[Sydla]

Could you imagine the outrage around here if we took a QB at #4 and then Jaylon Smith in the 2nd round?

Two guys who likely wouldn't play for us in 2016? Oh boy...........

 

[LucaBrasi]

Hackenberg at #40. Interesting, higher than I would have thought.

 

[Floatyworm]

Could you imagine the outrage around here if we took a QB at #4 and then Jaylon Smith in the 2nd round?

Two guys who likely wouldn't play for us in 2016? Oh boy...........

I would take that in a heartbeat...........

1. Lynch
2. Jaylon Smith
3. CB....William Jackson III
4. DT....Sheldon Day

Sign me up

 

[Alexander]

Hackenberg at #40. Interesting, higher than I would have thought.

He is probably stuck on the same track people were before he stunk it up this season.

He checks the arm talent/size box, but to me he is mentally damaged goods with all the sacks he has absorbed.

 

[CherBoyWade]

seems about right for hargreaves.i was hoping we can get fuller with our 2nd pick.

What worries me in particular about Hargreaves is his height. Will be very interesting to see how he measures out at the combine.

 

[CherBoyWade]

I would take that in a heartbeat...........

1. Lynch
2. Jaylon Smith
3. CB....William Jackson III
4. DT....Sheldon Day

Sign me up

Count me in. I was on board with Jaylon at 4 before the injury. If he's there in the second we better be all over him. I watched all of his games the past 2 years and he is going to be elite. I wish I could see what his 40 time would be at the combine, the man runs like a WR.

 

[Alexander]

What worries me in particular about Hargreaves is his height. Will be very interesting to see how he measures out at the combine.

I would be surprised it he hits his listed height of 5'11".

 

[CherBoyWade]

I would be surprised it he hits his listed height of 5'11".

As would I, I think he'll be around 5'9" and that will cause a major hit to his stock. I prefer Alexander myself. As much as I think we need secondary help I definitely have my fears about VHIII and Ramsey especially as high as 4.

 

[stilltheguru88]

Count me in. I was on board with Jaylon at 4 before the injury. If he's there in the second we better be all over him. I watched all of his games the past 2 years and he is going to be elite. I wish I could see what his 40 time would be at the combine, the man runs like a WR.

He wont play this year. Are we going for it all or not?

 

[Risen Star]

I prefer Alexander myself.

He's the same bitter bastid no matter what he calls himself.

 

[Sydla]

He wont play this year. Are we going for it all or not?

You can't make a draft pick based on just one year.

If we are sitting there at 36 and Smith slides to us and the Cowboys have him as the top guy on their board, you'd have to take him even if you know he might not play for half or even all the 2016 season.

 

[tyke1doe]

Could you imagine the outrage around here if we took a QB at #4 and then Jaylon Smith in the 2nd round?

Two guys who likely wouldn't play for us in 2016? Oh boy...........

I'd be okay with it if we picked Collins or Henry with our third. I'm not necessarily in the "win-now" mode. Although I really would like for Romo to get a ring (or at least get to the Super Bowl), this team will be around long after Romo is gone, and it has to prepare for the future.

I think we have a good nucleus of special, young players. And if we add a future franchise quarterback, he could step in, and the Cowboys - hopefully based on expectations - wouldn't miss a beat similar to the Packers when Rodgers stepped in for Favre.

 

[Risen Star]

I'd be okay with it if we picked Collins or Henry with our third. I'm not necessarily in the "win-now" mode. Although I really would like for Romo to get a ring (or at least get to the Super Bowl), this team will be around long after Romo is gone, and it has to prepare for the future.

I think we have a good nucleus of special, young players. And if we add a future franchise quarterback, he could step in, and the Cowboys - hopefully based on expectations - wouldn't miss a beat similar to the Packers when Rodgers stepped in for Favre.

You mean if we can replace Romo adequately we have a chance to continue this run of success?

Count me in.

 

[Zimmy Lives]

Looks legit; Shawn "Twinkle Toes" Oakman is not in the top twenty.

 

[tyke1doe]

You mean if we can replace Romo adequately we have a chance to continue this run of success?

Count me in.

If we pick a guy we believe can lead the franchise into the future and if we give that guy time to learn the game, yes.

 

[Risen Star]

If we pick a guy we believe can lead the franchise into the future and if we give that guy time to learn the game, yes.

Wow. Go Cowboys.

 

[stilltheguru88]

You can't make a draft pick based on just one year.

If we are sitting there at 36 and Smith slides to us and the Cowboys have him as the top guy on their board, you'd have to take him even if you know he might not play for half or even all the 2016 season.

I'll respectfully disagree.show me a winning team that does that.